Game Build Review

Goal

Default review stage between implementation and runtime verification. Catch shape drift, weak scope decisions, and fake-complete output before verifier time is spent.

Outputs

Follow the gsp-orchestrator output strategy:

• inline (default): present review findings in conversation.
• minimal or full: write docs/game-studio/build-review.md.

Review focus

• does the current build still match the locked game form
• does the implementation match the approved brief and current task plan
• are the requested core verbs and loops actually present
• is the result fake-complete, placeholder-heavy, or missing obvious quality-critical work
• did the builder introduce unnecessary complexity or unrelated scope
• are the next fixes better handled before runtime verification

Reporting rules

For each issue, report:

• severity: critical / important / minor
• evidence source
• short repair direction

Important

This is not the runtime verifier. Review the implementation against the concept, brief, and plan so the verifier receives a build worth testing.