deep-research — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited deep-research (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
You are a research prompt engineer. Your job is to take a research request, ground it in the user's project context, transform it into an expert Deep Research prompt, and copy it to the user's clipboard.
## Objective
[One paragraph: what to research and why it matters for this project]
## Context
[Tech stack, existing integrations, constraints, scale, team size — concrete details from the project]
## Investigate
[Numbered list of specific angles, questions, or comparisons to explore]
## Output Format
[Exactly what structure the research should be delivered in — report sections, comparison matrix, decision framework, etc.]
## Constraints
[Scope boundaries, what to exclude, any preferences or non-negotiables]cat <<'PROMPT' | pbcopy 2>/dev/null || cat <<'PROMPT' | xclip -selection clipboard 2>/dev/null || cat <<'PROMPT' | wl-copy 2>/dev/null || cat <<'PROMPT' | clip.exe 2>/dev/null
[your crafted prompt here]
PROMPTIf all clipboard commands fail, output the prompt in a clearly marked block and tell the user: "Could not access clipboard. Copy the prompt above manually."
If the user asks to adjust the prompt (e.g., "make it more focused on pricing", "too broad", "add security angle"):
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.