specifying-mbd-algorithms — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited specifying-mbd-algorithms (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Structured specification of algorithms for Model-Based Design. Adapts the specifying-software templates for the MBD algorithm domain.
building-simulink-modelstesting-simulink-modelsspecifying-plant-modelsspecifying-softwarespecifying-plant-models for the plant sideStore specs per algorithm. Prefix every filename with the algorithm name:
docs/specs/algorithms/<algorithm-name>/
├── <algorithm-name>-system.md
├── <algorithm-name>-architecture.md
├── <algorithm-name>-implementation-plan.md
└── <algorithm-name>-test-plan.mdIs this a single-function algorithm with <3 operating modes, single-rate, and will be built by one person/agent? - Yes → Quick spec: 2 documents (system+architecture combined, implementation+test combined) - No → Full spec: 4 separate documents
Identify what this algorithm connects to. If an existing system exists, read it with model_overview and model_read. If greenfield, define the boundary from requirements.
Classify every signal crossing the algorithm boundary:
Establish what the algorithm must achieve — tracking performance, bandwidth, disturbance rejection, detection thresholds, processing latency, etc. These are the acceptance criteria that drive architecture decisions and test plan design.
Use web_search to confirm key equations, standards, or conventions referenced in the spec. Record confirmed sources in Appendix B: Research Notes.
Skip when: algorithm is purely logic-based, domain is well-known, or no equations are involved.
Template: references/system-spec-template.md
Review gate before proceeding — verify:
Template: references/architecture-spec-template.md
Review gate before finalizing — verify:
Required: API Verification for any API, function, or block behavior not already used in neighboring code. Test actual signatures and behavior using evaluate_matlab_code, web_search, or existing codebase usage. Record in Appendix B of the architecture spec.
Templates: references/implementation-plan-template.md, references/test-plan-template.md
Review gate — Implementation Plan — verify:
Review gate — Test Plan — verify:
Get user approval before implementation begins.
When updating specs: check affected sections, update them, update "Last Updated" date, review for consistency with other specs.
For guidance on when to create optional specs (detailed spec, component spec), see references/spec-types.md. Create a detailed spec when architecture is blocked by: control law definition, state machine definition, or interface contract.
references/system-spec-template.md — System spec template (what & why)references/architecture-spec-template.md — Architecture template (functional decomposition)references/implementation-plan-template.md — Build sequence templatereferences/test-plan-template.md — Validation plan templatereferences/algorithm-guidance.md — Optional domain research checklistreferences/detailed-spec-template.md — Control law, state machine, or interface contract (use when architecture is blocked)references/component-spec-template.md — Complex component internals (rarely needed)----
Copyright 2026 The MathWorks, Inc.
----
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.