abm-campaign-builder — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited abm-campaign-builder (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
This skill builds a structured ABM program from account selection through to sales-marketing coordination and measurement. It treats ABM as a systems problem: the account list, the tier structure, the channel mix, and the sales handoff all have to work together or the program produces activity without pipeline.
Ask the user for the following context before proceeding:
If they have an existing program, ask what is and is not working before redesigning it.
A functional ABM program has five components. Build all five or the program will not hold together.
This is where most ABM programs fail. The account list is built from gut feel or a spreadsheet of logos someone wants to land, rather than from data about which accounts are most likely to buy.
How to build the right list:
Start with closed-won data. Look at the last 12-24 months of deals that closed and identify the patterns: company size, industry vertical, tech stack, growth stage, geography, and buyer persona. That is your ICP. Accounts that match that pattern are the highest-probability targets.
Layer in intent data if available. Accounts that match the ICP and are showing buying signals (researching relevant topics, visiting competitor sites, hiring for roles that indicate a relevant initiative) are the highest-priority targets.
Filter by sales capacity. An ABM list is only as good as the coverage behind it. If sales can genuinely work 50 accounts at a time, the list should be 50 accounts, not 500.
Not all ABM accounts get the same treatment. Tier structure defines how resources are allocated across the list.
Tier 1 (1:1 programs, 5-20 accounts): Highest priority accounts. Fully custom: personalized content, executive outreach, dedicated sales attention. Marketing is essentially an extension of the account team for these accounts.
Tier 2 (1:few programs, 20-100 accounts): High priority accounts grouped by vertical, use case, or persona. Campaigns are personalized to the cluster, not to the individual account.
Tier 3 (1:many programs, 100+ accounts): Scaled ABM. Accounts that match the ICP but do not yet have enough signal to warrant Tier 1 or 2 investment. Programmatic targeting and intent-triggered outreach.
Tier 1: Direct mail, executive events, personalized video outreach, custom content specific to their situation, LinkedIn direct messaging coordinated with sales.
Tier 2: LinkedIn targeting by account list, personalized email sequences, webinars by vertical, paid retargeting against account lists, SDR outreach with account-specific context.
Tier 3: Programmatic display targeting by account list, LinkedIn sponsored content, intent-triggered email sequences.
Content principle: Every content asset should speak to a specific problem, not a generic benefit. The best ABM content makes the account feel like it was written for them specifically.
ABM only works when sales and marketing are operating from the same account plan. For each Tier 1 account, maintain:
Coordination cadence: Weekly or biweekly for Tier 1. Monthly for Tier 2. Quarterly for Tier 3.
ABM should not be measured by lead volume. It should be measured by account penetration and pipeline influence.
Metrics that matter:
one known contact engaged in the last 90 days
from the target account list this quarter
What not to measure: MQL volume from ABM campaigns. ABM does not produce MQLs. It produces account engagement. Measuring it like inbound will make the program look underperforming when it is working.
Output in this format:
ABM PROGRAM PLAN
[Company or team name if provided]
Built: [today's date]
PROGRAM OVERVIEW
[2-3 sentences on scope: accounts, tiers, primary 90-day objective]
ACCOUNT LIST CRITERIA
ICP definition: [firmographic and technographic criteria]
Tier 1 accounts: [number and selection criteria]
Tier 2 accounts: [number and selection criteria]
Tier 3 accounts: [number and selection criteria]
Data sources needed: [intent data, CRM, LinkedIn, etc.]
CHANNEL MIX BY TIER
Tier 1: [specific channels]
Tier 2: [specific channels]
Tier 3: [specific channels]
CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
[What content needs to be created or repurposed. Specific format
and audience, not generic.]
SALES-MARKETING COORDINATION PLAN
Review cadence: [how often and what format]
Account ownership: [who owns which tier]
Handoff definition: [when does marketing hand to sales]
90-DAY MEASUREMENT PLAN
Week 1-4: [what to track and what baseline to establish]
Week 5-8: [what signals indicate the program is working]
Week 9-12: [what to report and what decisions to make]
SUCCESS METRICS
Primary: [the one number that tells you the program is working]
Secondary: [supporting metrics]
What not to track: [metrics that will mislead you]
RISKS AND WHAT TO WATCH
[Two or three most likely failure points and how to address proactively]budget, headcount, and tool access.
scale they are describing. A 500-account Tier 1 program is not ABM.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.