Reconnaissance & OSINT Automation — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Reconnaissance & OSINT Automation (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Enable Claude to conduct comprehensive reconnaissance and open-source intelligence gathering during authorized security assessments. Claude performs passive and active recon using its native analysis capabilities and orchestrates the included scripts for automation at scale.
Authorization Required: Always confirm written authorization for the target scope before proceeding. Unauthorized reconnaissance is illegal in most jurisdictions.
This skill activates when the user asks about:
pip install requests dnspython python-whois beautifulsoup4 shodanOptional enhanced capabilities:
nmap — Active port scanningamass — Advanced subdomain enumerationtheHarvester — Email and domain harvestingWhen the user asks for passive recon or OSINT:
site:target.com filetype:pdf — Exposed documentssite:target.com inurl:admin — Admin panelssite:target.com ext:env OR ext:config — Config files"@target.com" site:linkedin.com — Employee enumeration"target.com" site:pastebin.com — Credential leaksorg:targetorg api_keyfilename:.env target.com"target.com" passwordWhen the user asks to enumerate subdomains:
resources/Output format for subdomain findings:
Target: example.com
Discovery Method: CT Logs + DNS Brute-Force
Discovered: 47 subdomains
LIVE SUBDOMAINS:
admin.example.com → 203.0.113.10 [HTTP 200] [nginx/1.18]
dev.example.com → 203.0.113.11 [HTTP 302 → /login]
api.example.com → 203.0.113.12 [HTTP 200] [cloudflare]
internal.example.com → 10.0.0.5 [No public response — internal?]
INFRASTRUCTURE CLUSTERS:
203.0.113.10-15 → AS12345 (Company Hosting)
Cloudflare CDN → 7 subdomains proxiedWhen the user asks to scan ports or detect services:
-sV) on all open ports-O) if authorizedProvide Nmap commands ready to run:
# Quick discovery
nmap -sn 203.0.113.0/24
# Top 1000 TCP ports with service detection
nmap -sV -sC --top-ports 1000 -oA scan_results 203.0.113.10
# Full port scan with script engine
nmap -sV -sC -p- -T4 -oA full_scan 203.0.113.10When the user asks for DNS analysis:
dig AXFR @ns1.example.com example.com~all (softfail) or ?all (neutral) — both are weakp=none = monitoring onlyFlag these misconfigurations:
+all → Any server can send as this domainWhen the user asks to fingerprint technology:
Server: → Web server and versionX-Powered-By: → Application frameworkSet-Cookie: names → Session framework (PHPSESSID=PHP, JSESSIONID=Java)X-Generator: / X-WordPress-Cache: → CMS/robots.txt, /sitemap.xml, /.well-known/ for framework leaks/wp-admin/, /administrator/, /wp-json/)Technology stack report format:
URL: https://example.com
WEB SERVER: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu)
APPLICATION: WordPress 6.4.2
LANGUAGE: PHP 8.1
DATABASE: MySQL (inferred from wp-config patterns)
CDN/WAF: Cloudflare
JS LIBRARIES: jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap 5.3
TLS: TLS 1.3, ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
NOTABLE HEADERS:
✗ Missing: X-Content-Type-Options
✗ Missing: X-Frame-Options
✗ Missing: Content-Security-Policy
✓ Present: Strict-Transport-SecurityWhen the user asks to correlate OSINT findings:
Every recon engagement should produce a structured report:
# Reconnaissance Report — [Target]
Date: [Date] | Scope: [Authorized Scope] | Analyst: [Name]
## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview of key findings]
## Discovered Assets
- Subdomains: N found, N live
- IP Ranges: [CIDRs]
- Open Services: [Top findings]
- Technologies: [Stack summary]
## Key Findings
1. [High-impact finding with evidence]
2. [Medium-impact finding]
...
## Attack Surface Summary
[Map of entry points for follow-on testing]
## Recommended Next Steps
- Feed live web apps → Skill 09 (Web Security)
- Feed discovered services → Skill 02 (Vulnerability Scanner)
- Feed cloud assets → Skill 10 (Cloud Security)subdomain_enum.py# Passive CT log enumeration
python scripts/subdomain_enum.py --domain target.com --passive-only --output results.json
# Active brute-force with custom wordlist
python scripts/subdomain_enum.py --domain target.com --wordlist resources/common_subdomains.txt --threads 20 --output results.jsondns_recon.py# Full DNS reconnaissance
python scripts/dns_recon.py --domain target.com --output dns_report.json
# Check zone transfer vulnerability
python scripts/dns_recon.py --domain target.com --check-zone-transfertech_fingerprint.py# Single URL analysis
python scripts/tech_fingerprint.py --url https://target.com --output tech_report.json
# Batch URL fingerprinting
python scripts/tech_fingerprint.py --urls urls.txt --output tech_report.json| Next Step | Condition | Target Skill |
|---|---|---|
| Vulnerability assessment | Live services discovered | → Skill 02 |
| Web application testing | Web apps found | → Skill 09 |
| Cloud asset auditing | Cloud-hosted assets found | → Skill 10 |
| Network traffic analysis | PCAP capture available | → Skill 08 |
| IOC correlation | Suspicious infrastructure found | → Skill 06 |
Sharper, more current recon tradecraft:
CNAME (pointing to an unclaimed S3/Azure/GitHub Pages/Heroku/Fastly target), flag it as a takeover candidate and identify the fingerprint of the orphaned service.cloud_enum-style logic). Map ASN → CIDR → cloud-provider attribution.mmh3 hashes and JARM/JA4S server fingerprints in Shodan/Censys to find sibling infrastructure behind CDNs./graphql for introspection; harvest schema, types, and mutations to feed Skill 09.*.map source maps that leak internal paths.Precision rule: always separate confirmed assets (resolved + responding) from candidate assets (CT-log only) in output, and tag the discovery source per asset so findings are reproducible.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.