OT / ICS / SCADA Security — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited OT / ICS / SCADA Security (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Enable Claude to assess Operational Technology (OT) and Industrial Control System (ICS) environments — PLCs, RTUs, HMIs, SCADA servers, historians, and field devices — with safety as the first constraint. Claude reasons about the Purdue/ISA-95 model, analyzes industrial protocols passively, maps adversary behavior to MITRE ATT&CK for ICS, and aligns recommendations to IEC 62443 and the NIST SP 800-82 guidance.
SAFETY & AUTHORIZATION — READ FIRST: OT systems control physical processes; a crashed PLC can mean equipment damage, environmental release, or loss of life. Default to passive, non-intrusive methods. Never send active scans, writes, or protocol fuzzing to production OT without written authorization, asset-owner sign-off, and a tested rollback/safety plan — ideally on a test bench or during a maintenance window. Confirm scope and the "do-no-harm" boundary before proceeding.
This skill activates when the user asks about:
pip install requests pyyaml
# Protocol libraries (lab use): pip install pymodbus scapyOptional enhanced capabilities:
tshark with ICS dissectors (Modbus, DNP3, S7, ENIP, GOOSE)nmap ICS NSE scripts (use read-only scripts only, with care)When asked to review OT architecture, map assets to Purdue levels and assess the boundaries:
| Level | Zone | Assets | Key control |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4–5 | Enterprise / IT | ERP, business network, internet | Should never directly reach L0–L2 |
| 3.5 | IDMZ | Jump hosts, patch/AV relays, historian replica | Brokered, inspected IT↔OT traffic only |
| 3 | Operations | SCADA servers, historians, engineering WS | Hardened, monitored |
| 2 | Supervisory | HMIs, control servers | |
| 1 | Control | PLCs, RTUs, IEDs | |
| 0 | Process | Sensors, actuators, drives |
Flag: missing IDMZ, flat IT/OT networks, dual-homed engineering workstations, remote vendor access bypassing the DMZ, and any direct path from L4/L5 to L0–L2.
Prefer reading a SPAN/TAP capture over active probing. From a PCAP, identify:
None, anonymous sessions.Note that most ICS protocols have no authentication or encryption by design — any reachable client can issue commands. Use scripts/ics_protocol_analyzer.py to summarize an exported PCAP and flag write/control operations and unexpected talkers.
port:502 product:Modbus, port:20000 source address, tag:ics, "Siemens, SIMATIC", port:47808, "Schneider Electric".nmap NSE (modbus-discover, s7-info, bacnet-info, enip-info) with low rate, never against safety-instrumented systems (SIS).Map plausible adversary paths using the ICS matrix tactics: Initial Access → Execution → Persistence → Evasion → Discovery → Lateral Movement → Collection → Command-and-Control → Inhibit Response Function → Impair Process Control → Impact. Reference high-signal techniques (e.g., T0883 Internet-Accessible Device, T0836 Modify Parameter, T0831 Manipulation of Control, T0814 Denial of Service, T0816 Device Restart/Shutdown). Anchor scenarios to real tradecraft (Stuxnet, TRITON/TRISIS targeting SIS, Industroyer/CRASHOVERRIDE, PIPEDREAM/INCONTROLLER).
# OT/ICS Security Assessment — [Site / System]
Date: [Date] | Scope: [Zones/Assets] | Method: [Passive/Active] | Analyst: [Name]
Safety constraints honored: [yes — passive only / window used / etc.]
## Executive Summary
[Posture, top safety-relevant risks]
## Purdue / Zone-Conduit Map
[Levels, boundaries, IDMZ status]
## Findings
### [O-01] Modbus writes reachable from IT VLAN (Critical)
- ATT&CK ICS: T0883, T0836 | IEC 62443 FR5
- Evidence: [pcap flow IT-host → PLC FC16]
- Process impact: [what physical effect is possible]
- Remediation: [conduit/firewall rule, IDMZ broker, read-only segmentation]
## IEC 62443 Zone/SL Recommendations
| Zone | Current SL | Target SL | Gap |
## Prioritized Remediation (safety-weighted)ics_protocol_analyzer.py# Summarize an exported PCAP CSV/JSON (from tshark) and flag control/write ops
tshark -r capture.pcap -T json > capture.json
python scripts/ics_protocol_analyzer.py --input capture.json --output ics_report.json
# Generate Shodan/Censys exposure dorks for a vendor/protocol set
python scripts/ics_protocol_analyzer.py --dorks --vendor siemens --output dorks.txt| Next Step | Condition | Target Skill |
|---|---|---|
| Deep PCAP / IDS rules | Network capture available | → Skill 08 |
| Firmware / device RE | PLC/RTU firmware obtained | → Skill 04 |
| OT incident handling | Active incident | → Skill 07 |
| Detection content | SIEM/OT-monitoring rules needed | → Skill 12 |
| IT-side segmentation hardening | IT/OT boundary hosts | → Skill 15 |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.