Mobile Application Security — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited Mobile Application Security (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Enable Claude to assess Android and iOS application security against the OWASP MASVS (Mobile Application Security Verification Standard) and execute tests from the OWASP MASTG (Mobile Application Security Testing Guide). Claude performs static analysis on APK/IPA artifacts, guides dynamic instrumentation (Frida/objection), reviews secure storage, transport, and platform-interaction controls, and triages potentially malicious mobile apps.
Authorization Required: Only test applications you own or are explicitly authorized to assess. Decompiling and modifying third-party apps may violate licenses and law. Confirm written scope before proceeding.
This skill activates when the user asks about:
AndroidManifest.xml, exported components, deep links, or Info.plist reviewpip install requests pyaxmlparserOptional enhanced capabilities:
apktool — APK decode/rebuildjadx — Dalvik → Java decompilerapkid — packer/obfuscator/compiler fingerprintingfrida / objection — dynamic instrumentationmobsf (MobSF) — automated static+dynamic analysis platformadb), unzip, opensslWhen asked to analyze an APK:
apktool d app.apk; extract AndroidManifest.xml, classes*.dex, resources.arsc, native libs (lib/), and assets.android:debuggable="true", android:allowBackup="true"activity/service/receiver/provider with exported="true" or implicit via intent-filter) lacking permissionsusesCleartextTraffic="true" / permissive network_security_configprotectionLevelandroid:autoVerify (app-link hijack), exported ContentProvider pathsjadx to Java; review auth, crypto, WebView (addJavascriptInterface, setJavaScriptEnabled, loadUrl with untrusted input), and SQL.apkid for packers/obfuscators; inspect lib/*/*.so for JNI entry points and hardcoded data.Use scripts/apk_analyzer.py for an automated first pass.
When asked to analyze an IPA:
Payload/<App>.app/.NSAppTransportSecurity exceptions (NSAllowsArbitraryLoads), URL schemes, UIFileSharingEnabled, permission usage strings.cryptid), PIE, stack canaries, ARC; detect missing hardening via otool/class-dump.strings and resource scan for keys, endpoints, tokens.NSUserDefaults, Core Data, Keychain accessibility classes (avoid kSecAttrAccessibleAlways), plist data at rest.Review where sensitive data lands at rest:
Guide runtime testing on a rooted/jailbroken test device or emulator:
android sslpinning disable, android root disable, keystore/keychain dump, list activities, start exported components.ContentProvider permissions, custom URL schemes / deep-link validation.For suspicious APKs: apkid packing, requested permissions vs. stated function, accessibility-service abuse, SMS/dialer/overlay permissions (banking-trojan markers), C2 URLs in strings, dynamic code loading (DexClassLoader). Hand confirmed IOCs to → Skill 06, deeper RE to → Skill 04/05.
# Mobile App Security Assessment — [App / Package]
Date: [Date] | Platform: [Android/iOS] | Version: [x.y.z] | Analyst: [Name]
## Executive Summary
[Posture, count by severity, top risks]
## MASVS Coverage
| Category | Result | Notes |
|----------|--------|-------|
| STORAGE | Fail | Token in SharedPreferences plaintext |
| CRYPTO | Pass | ... |
| NETWORK | Partial | No pinning |
| PLATFORM | ... |
| CODE / RESILIENCE | ... |
## Findings
### [M-01] Hardcoded API Key in resources (High)
- MASTG-TEST ref / MASVS-STORAGE
- Evidence: res/values/strings.xml:api_key=...
- Impact / Remediation: [rotate, move to backend, ...]
## Recommendations (Prioritized)apk_analyzer.py# Static triage of an APK: manifest flags, permissions, exported components, secrets
python scripts/apk_analyzer.py --apk app.apk --output apk_report.json
# Secret-scan the decoded sources too (point at an apktool/jadx output dir)
python scripts/apk_analyzer.py --apk app.apk --sources ./jadx_out --output apk_report.json| Next Step | Condition | Target Skill |
|---|---|---|
| Backend API testing | App talks to REST/GraphQL API | → Skill 09 |
| Deeper native/binary RE | .so / obfuscated logic | → Skill 04 |
| Malware classification | Suspicious/packed APK | → Skill 05 |
| IOC correlation | C2 / malicious infra found | → Skill 06 |
| Crypto implementation review | Custom crypto in app | → Skill 13 |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.