think — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited think (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Ask me about every part of this plan, one question at a time, until we both understand it the same way. Work through every open question - and the new ones each answer raises - settling them one at a time.
For each question, provide your recommended answer. Ask one question at a time.
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead of asking me.
Don't stop until every one of these is settled. Chase any new questions that open up along the way.
When every question is settled, recap it back to me in plain terms: the problem, what we'll build (what, not how), how we'll know it works, and what we're not building. Ask whether that matches what I meant.
If I correct something: settle the new question, then recap again. If I confirm, end with:
We're agreed on what to build.
**Next:** run /specbuild, not a document.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.