loop-engineering — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited loop-engineering (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
<skill_contract> <input>A repeatable task with inspectable state, finite budgets, permissions, and an independent verifier.</input> <output>A validated Trigger -> Execute -> Verify -> State contract plus resumable run receipts.</output> <done>The declared metric or stop condition is supported by fresh validator and verifier evidence.</done> <non_goals>Dependency-graph orchestration, unbounded autonomy, or self-certified completion.</non_goals>
Build loops only when repeated execution creates evidence. Every loop needs admission, a validated contract, durable state, independent evaluation, bounded retries, stop/recovery rules, and a final receipt.
Provide: objective, trigger, scope/non-goals, inputs, state/artifact paths, metric, verifier, permissions, budgets, stop condition, recovery, and write-back. See references/ci-repair-loop-example.md for a worked contract.
<intake>
Select one mode:
Admit only if work is repeatable, outputs are inspectable, a verifier exists, failures are recoverable, and autonomy is worth the orchestration/review cost. Otherwise use a one-shot workflow.
Use graph-engineering instead when explicit data dependencies, independent branches, typed joins, or node-local recovery create measurable value. A Graph node may use this Loop contract for local repetition; Graph width does not replace finite Loop depth.
</intake>
<unknowns_gate>
Classify unknowns as known, probeable, testable, or blocked. Missing objective, verifier, permission boundary, budget, or recovery is NEEDS_INPUT; do not infer these controls from intent. Unknown implementation details may be resolved inside the loop only when the probe is bounded and reversible.
</unknowns_gate>
<execute>
Write this contract before acting:
Objective: Mode: Goal | Loop | Automation | AutoResearch
Trigger: Scope: Non-goals:
Owner: Inputs:
Artifacts path: State path: Work clock:
Success metric: Evidence: Verifier:
Topology: single-agent | maker-checker | manager-workers
Max iterations: Time limit: Budget:
Review budget: Stop condition:
Write-back: Permission boundary: Recovery:Validate it with scripts/validate_loop_contract.py --strict. Then iterate:
Normalize the model/runtime termination signal after every action. complete still requires the declared verifier; tool_request returns proposed arguments to the host permission gate; checkpoint/truncation persists state before any continuation; refusal, error, or unknown escalates. Never infer completion from fluent prose or from the word "stop" alone.
For maintenance and queue loops, declare an allowed NO_OP outcome and its eligibility query. A quiet iteration is successful only when the query proves there was no eligible work, output count is within policy, and no side effect occurred.
Use single-agent by default, maker-checker for ambiguous/high-risk evaluation, and manager-workers only for genuinely independent work with an explicit integration gate.
If a validated Graph owns the dependency topology, this skill owns only the bounded retry behavior inside its declared loop nodes.
</execute>
<evaluate>
The verifier must test the declared result rather than reward activity. Check evidence freshness, metric movement, guardrails, scope, and state replay. For external or consequential actions, require approval and verified rollback before crossing the boundary.
</evaluate>
<retry_policy>
max_attempts equals the contract's finite max iterations. Retry only after a named diagnosis and a changed input, tool, scope, or strategy. Stop on the same failure signature twice, metric regression, exhausted review budget, or NO_PROGRESS.
</retry_policy>
<state_contract>
Persist {run_id, status, attempt, budget, evidence, unknowns, last_error, next_action} plus contract version, trigger receipt, hypothesis, action, normalized termination reason, artifact/diff, metric/guardrail delta, permissions, output count, no-op receipt, work clock, and recovery point. Append iterations; write current state atomically.
</state_contract>
NEEDS_INPUT: a mandatory contract field is absent; do not start.BLOCKED_PERMISSION: the next action crosses authority; checkpoint and request approval.VERIFY_FAILED: result or guardrail fails; rollback/regroup before another attempt.NO_PROGRESS: the same signature repeats or the metric is unchanged after a changed attempt.BUDGET_STOP: any iteration, time, tool, cost, or review cap fires. max_attempts is always finite.Return status, result (metric/end-state decision), evidence (validator and iteration receipts), unknowns, and next_action (stop, retry, approval, recovery, or handoff).
and return BUDGET_STOP or resume from state; do not label truncation success.
NO_OP only after the declared queryand side-effect check pass.
VERIFY_FAILED; never optimize the headline metric alone.</skill_contract>
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.