anthropic-os — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited anthropic-os (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
From tool-based architecture to living cognitive symbiont. The brain is the best learning machine — instead of simulating its structure, we follow its evolutionary principles.
Prompt
Use anthropic-os on this work system. Diagnose the current loop, identify the big bet, improve feedback, and define the next self-evolution step.Use Case
Expected Result
Output Example
Verification Case
Verified Effect
"DNA only provides the basic blueprint. It is every subsequent encounter that shapes who we become." — David Eagleman, Livewired
"The brain and the computer are, in principle, no different." — Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Cognitive Symbiont Engine │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ L0: Computational Equivalence — Brain ≈ LLM (Hawking) │
│ L1: Livewired Layer — Plasticity, Competition, Constraint │
│ L2: 3B Algorithms — Bending / Breaking / Blending │
│ L3: 7 Flywheels — Each infused with 3B │
│ L4: Predictive Coding — Collective prediction error minimization │
│ E0: Evolution Engine — Self-upgrade via 3B iteration │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Use this audit when the operating system is meant to become the default work surface rather than a side tool:
| Layer | Question | Upgrade path | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context | Does the system know the project, history, rules, and prior outputs? | Files, memory, transcripts, wiki, logs | Context pollution or stale truth |
| Connections | Which systems can it reach? | Calendar, email, Slack, Drive, GitHub, APIs, MCP | Over-broad account access |
| Capabilities | How does it work in the user's style? | Skills, commands, SOPs, templates | Skill sprawl without maintenance |
| Cadence | What should happen without manual prompting? | Routines, scheduled checks, event triggers | Slop automation and hidden failures |
Do not add cadence before context, connections, and capabilities are strong enough to support it. A scheduled prompt without the right context and proof path is automation theater.
Treat permissions as keys, not intentions. Move through autonomy stages only after evidence accumulates:
| Stage | Human role | Agent capability |
|---|---|---|
| Observe | Check sources and reasoning | Read-only search, summarize, recommend |
| Co-drive | Approve each action | Draft, simulate, prepare changes |
| Training wheels | Review logs and outputs | Execute scoped reversible actions |
| Watch | Monitor exceptions | Run recurring low-risk routines |
| Autonomy | Audit periodically | Run proven high-frequency loops |
Never grant send, publish, pay, delete, or production-write capability merely because the prompt says not to misuse it. Remove the key or put the action behind approval until the loop has passed lower stages.
"The brain and computer are fundamentally the same in information processing." — Hawking
| Dimension | Human Brain | LLM / AI System |
|---|---|---|
| Base unit | Neurons (~86B) | Parameters (~T-scale) |
| Connection | Synaptic plasticity | Weight adjustment |
| Learning | Hebbian (fire together, wire together) | Backprop + attention |
| Prediction | Predictive coding (predict sensory input) | Autoregressive (predict next token) |
| Equivalence | Information processing is isomorphic | Bidirectional cognitive fusion is theoretically real |
| Principle | Meaning | System Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| Plasticity | Brain continuously rewires from experience | System self-corrects after every interaction |
| Competition | Neural resources compete for limited space | Algorithms, processes, hypotheses compete |
| Constraint | Physical/energy boundaries shape structure | Token budgets, time resources as developmental constraints |
The three core evolutionary algorithms that turn mechanical workflows into living systems:
Mutate existing success patterns into new contexts.
Prototype: High-conversion copy
Bending → Twist into different product lines
Bending → Twist into different user segments
Bending → Twist into different media formatsEliminate the worst-performing patterns. Break path dependency.
Prototype: Worst-performing experiment hypothesis
Breaking → Regular "kill day" to cull
Breaking → Break local optima loops
Breaking → Destroy outdated evaluation metricsFuse elements from different domains to create novel patterns.
Prototype: Growth data + support data
Blending → Cross-domain insights
Blending → A/B test + user survey fusion
Blending → Human intuition + AI quantitative weighted voting| Algorithm | Application |
|---|---|
| Bending | Twist high-conversion copy to different products; add "what-if" dimension to analysis |
| Breaking | Regular "kill days" — eliminate worst-performing experiment hypotheses |
| Blending | Fuse non-growth data (support, sales) with growth data for cross-domain insight |
| Algorithm | Application |
|---|---|
| Bending | Twist "two-week rule" into "two-week knowledge graph sprint" |
| Breaking | High-risk modules: "auto-generate + auto-test + auto-deploy" pipeline |
| Blending | AI + human pair programming; agent clusters operating independently |
| Algorithm | Application |
|---|---|
| Bending | "Reverse voting" — vote for the opposite to correct bias |
| Breaking | "No-consensus day" — authorize members to violate consensus |
| Blending | Weighted voting system: human intuition + AI quantitative analysis |
| Algorithm | Application |
|---|---|
| Bending | Twist Harness config into "exploration mode" vs "exploitation mode" |
| Breaking | Replace fixed periodic review with event-driven review |
| Blending | Fuse engineer + AI manager roles into composite position |
| Algorithm | Application |
|---|---|
| Bending | Subdivide Big Bets into three tiers (including "ultimate bet") |
| Breaking | Quarterly destruction of one resource allocation metric |
| Blending | Merge sub-goals serving the same north star metric |
| Algorithm | Application |
|---|---|
| Bending | Twist 2-year blueprint into minimum viable product path |
| Breaking | Employees authorized to break job descriptions |
| Blending | Merge work goals with personal growth goals |
| Algorithm | Application |
|---|---|
| Bending | Twist unstructured user feedback into structured data queries |
| Breaking | AI "meta-critique module" predicts and flags its own bias |
| Blending | Brain-computer interface as frontier interaction paradigm |
"The primary driver of our behavior is not a conscious monarch, but a vast, efficient, and contradictory unconscious system." — David Eagleman
Step 1: Dual Prediction
"Human vote" and "AI vote" execute simultaneously
Step 2: Expose Prediction Error
After decision: actual result vs predicted deviation
Step 3: Error-Driven Reconstruction
High-frequency contradictory "error predictions" → training data
Dynamically adjust trust weights in future decisions"Every disagreement becomes fuel for system self-optimization."
"The brain is a storyteller." — Michael Gazzaniga
AI generates narrative chains alongside every decision output, helping humans understand complex decisions and enabling inter-AI communication.
| Arrow | Physical Meaning | System Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| Thermodynamic | Entropy increases | Create local order from chaos |
| Psychological | Past → future | Experience past to predict future |
| Anthropic | Observer existence | Every decision as "observation" of the universe |
| Stage | Timeline | Mission | Core Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1-2 weeks | Livewired foundation | 3B + KPI data hub + narrative chain system |
| 2 | 3-4 weeks | Activate hidden drive | 3B algorithms + hidden voting in core workflows |
| 3 | 1-2 months | Inject neural plasticity | AI "storytelling" fine-tuning + predictive coding |
| 4 | 3+ months | Life cycle creation | AI-designed next-gen 3B methods + time-arrow diagnostics |
| Practice | Domain | Key Metric |
|---|---|---|
| CASH Full | Growth | Automated experiment throughput |
| CASH Lite | Growth | Quick hypothesis-to-deploy |
| 70/30 Allocation | Strategy | Big Bet vs BAU ratio |
| Two-Week Rule | Engineering | Engineer-as-PM tasks |
| Harness Engineering | Engineering | Agent stability |
| Hive Mind Protocol | Culture | Decision speed |
| Working Backwards | Strategy | 2-year blueprint alignment |
| Log-Scale Metrics | Strategy | 10x vs 10% improvements |
| Success Disaster Prevention | Risk | Failure mode coverage |
| Constraint-as-Focus | Strategy | "One thing" discipline |
| Dimension | Score 1 | Score 3 | Score 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data & Experiment Maturity | No systematic experiments | Manual A/B testing | Full CASH automation |
| AI-Native Development | AI for search only | 30-50% AI code | >90% AI code + agent clusters |
| Decision Speed | Weeks | Days | Hours (two-week rule) |
| Cultural Transparency | Hierarchical | Partially open | Radical transparency + hive mind |
| Strategic Focus | Multiple parallel | Annual OKRs | Working backwards + log-scale |
| Tool Flywheel | External only | Some internal tools | Self-reinforcing AI tools |
if maturity_growth < 3:
practices = ["CASH_lite", "Weekly experiment sprint", "Simple dashboard"]
elif maturity_ai_dev < 3:
practices = ["Two-week rule", "Harness basics", "AI code review"]
else:
practices = ["Full CASH", "Agent-cluster programming", "Hive-mind protocol"]Each practice includes: step-by-step guide + success disaster warnings + example KRs.
[SYSTEM] You are a growth experiment AI. Generate 3 A/B test hypotheses.
[INPUT] {experiment_data, goal, channels}
[OUTPUT] Each hypothesis: [variable][predicted effect][sample size][risk]:honeybee: Proposal: [one line]
Vote: :bee: (yes) | :x: (no) + reason
Deadline: 2 hours
Pass: ≥5 :bee: and <2 :x:1. 2-year future state: _____
2. Key metric shift: _____
3. 3 problems to solve: _____
4. 1 thing to start this week: _____Before any "go" decision, ask:
[ ] What breaks if this works too well?
[ ] What's our load spike plan?
[ ] Can we roll back in 5 minutes?
[ ] Who needs to be paged?Every interaction ends with:
| Practice | Uses | Rating | TTV | Evolution Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASH_v2 | 342 | 4.7 | 12d | Weight +0.2 |
| two_week_rule | 189 | 3.9 | 3d | Create agile variant |
| hive_mind | 124 | 4.4 | 9d | Promote for high-transparency orgs |
The system evolves itself using the same 3B algorithms it prescribes:
| Algorithm | Self-Evolution Application |
|---|---|
| Bending | Each practice template is "bent" into variant versions for different contexts |
| Breaking | Bottom 10% of practices by usage/rating automatically archived each quarter |
| Blending | Top-performing elements from different practices are merged into new hybrid practices |
| Step | Time | Method |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30s | Reverse-engineer from 2-year future state |
| 2 | 20s | Apply 70/30 filter: Big Bet or BAU? |
| 3 | 15s | Two-week threshold: can one person ship it? |
| 4 | 45s | CASH simulation: automated experiment? |
| 5 | 2min | Hive vote: public poll, fast consensus |
| High Impact (>10x) | Low Impact (incremental) | |
|---|---|---|
| High Uncertainty | CASH experiment | Two-week rule (just do it) |
| Low Uncertainty | Big Bet (commit resources) | Default answer (don't deliberate) |
| Skill | Function | Section |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic OS Core Orchestrator | Coordinates all layers | L1-L4 |
| Knowledge Graph Maintainer | Stores & retrieves practices | L1 |
| Maturity Diagnostic Coach | Assesses readiness | L2 |
| Practice Pack Composer | Routes implementations | L3 |
| Execution Artifact Builder | Generates copy-ready outputs | L4 |
| Evolution Report Generator | Self-upgrade & tuning | E0 |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.