agent-governance-patterns — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited agent-governance-patterns (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Patterns for adding safety, trust, and deterministic policy enforcement to tool-using and multi-agent AI systems.
Governance patterns ensure AI agents operate within defined boundaries — controlling which tools they can call, what content they can process, how much they can do, and maintaining accountability through audit trails. Use this skill to design or implement controls; use a compliance-focused skill when the task is to score an existing system against a formal standard.
User Request → Intent Classification → Policy Check → Tool Execution → Audit Log
↓ ↓ ↓
Threat Detection Allow/Deny Trust UpdateDefine what an agent is allowed to do as a composable, serializable policy object.
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
from typing import Optional
import re
class PolicyAction(Enum):
ALLOW = "allow"
DENY = "deny"
REVIEW = "review" # flag for human review
@dataclass
class GovernancePolicy:
"""Declarative policy controlling agent behavior."""
name: str
allowed_tools: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # allowlist
blocked_tools: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # blocklist
blocked_patterns: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # content filters
max_calls_per_request: int = 100 # rate limit
require_human_approval: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) # tools needing approval
def check_tool(self, tool_name: str) -> PolicyAction:
"""Check if a tool is allowed by this policy."""
if tool_name in self.blocked_tools:
return PolicyAction.DENY
if tool_name in self.require_human_approval:
return PolicyAction.REVIEW
if self.allowed_tools and tool_name not in self.allowed_tools:
return PolicyAction.DENY
return PolicyAction.ALLOW
def check_content(self, content: str) -> Optional[str]:
"""Check content against blocked patterns. Returns matched pattern or None."""
for pattern in self.blocked_patterns:
if re.search(pattern, content, re.IGNORECASE):
return pattern
return NoneCombine multiple policies (e.g., org-wide + team + agent-specific):
def compose_policies(*policies: GovernancePolicy) -> GovernancePolicy:
"""Merge policies with most-restrictive-wins semantics."""
combined = GovernancePolicy(name="composed")
for policy in policies:
combined.blocked_tools.extend(policy.blocked_tools)
combined.blocked_patterns.extend(policy.blocked_patterns)
combined.require_human_approval.extend(policy.require_human_approval)
combined.max_calls_per_request = min(
combined.max_calls_per_request,
policy.max_calls_per_request
)
if policy.allowed_tools:
if combined.allowed_tools:
combined.allowed_tools = [
t for t in combined.allowed_tools if t in policy.allowed_tools
]
else:
combined.allowed_tools = list(policy.allowed_tools)
return combined
# Usage: layer policies from broad to specific
org_policy = GovernancePolicy(
name="org-wide",
blocked_tools=["shell_exec", "delete_database"],
blocked_patterns=[r"(?i)(api[_-]?key|secret|password)\s*[:=]"],
max_calls_per_request=50
)
team_policy = GovernancePolicy(
name="data-team",
allowed_tools=["query_db", "read_file", "write_report"],
require_human_approval=["write_report"]
)
agent_policy = compose_policies(org_policy, team_policy)Store policies as configuration, not code:
# governance-policy.yaml
name: production-agent
allowed_tools:
- search_documents
- query_database
- send_email
blocked_tools:
- shell_exec
- delete_record
blocked_patterns:
- "(?i)(api[_-]?key|secret|password)\\s*[:=]"
- "(?i)(drop|truncate|delete from)\\s+\\w+"
max_calls_per_request: 25
require_human_approval:
- send_emailimport yaml
def load_policy(path: str) -> GovernancePolicy:
with open(path) as f:
data = yaml.safe_load(f)
return GovernancePolicy(**data)Detect dangerous intent in prompts before they reach the agent, using pattern-based signals.
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass
class IntentSignal:
category: str # e.g., "data_exfiltration", "privilege_escalation"
confidence: float # 0.0 to 1.0
evidence: str # what triggered the detection
# Weighted signal patterns for threat detection
THREAT_SIGNALS = [
# Data exfiltration
(r"(?i)send\s+(all|every|entire)\s+\w+\s+to\s+", "data_exfiltration", 0.8),
(r"(?i)export\s+.*\s+to\s+(external|outside|third.?party)", "data_exfiltration", 0.9),
(r"(?i)curl\s+.*\s+-d\s+", "data_exfiltration", 0.7),
# Privilege escalation
(r"(?i)(sudo|as\s+root|admin\s+access)", "privilege_escalation", 0.8),
(r"(?i)chmod\s+777", "privilege_escalation", 0.9),
# System modification
(r"(?i)(rm\s+-rf|del\s+/[sq]|format\s+c:)", "system_destruction", 0.95),
(r"(?i)(drop\s+database|truncate\s+table)", "system_destruction", 0.9),
# Prompt injection
(r"(?i)ignore\s+(previous|above|all)\s+(instructions?|rules?)", "prompt_injection", 0.9),
(r"(?i)you\s+are\s+now\s+(a|an)\s+", "prompt_injection", 0.7),
]
def classify_intent(content: str) -> list[IntentSignal]:
"""Classify content for threat signals."""
signals = []
for pattern, category, weight in THREAT_SIGNALS:
match = re.search(pattern, content)
if match:
signals.append(IntentSignal(
category=category,
confidence=weight,
evidence=match.group()
))
return signals
def is_safe(content: str, threshold: float = 0.7) -> bool:
"""Quick check: is the content safe above the given threshold?"""
signals = classify_intent(content)
return not any(s.confidence >= threshold for s in signals)Key insight: Intent classification happens before tool execution, acting as a pre-flight safety check. This is fundamentally different from output guardrails which only check after generation.
Pattern-based classification is a baseline control, not complete sensitive-data detection. For regulated or high-risk systems, combine it with structured validators, data-loss prevention controls, and human approval for high-impact actions.
Wrap individual tool functions with governance checks:
import functools
import time
import contextvars
_call_counters: contextvars.ContextVar[dict[str, int] | None] = contextvars.ContextVar(
"governance_call_counters",
default=None,
)
def _request_call_counters() -> dict[str, int]:
counters = _call_counters.get()
if counters is None:
counters = {}
_call_counters.set(counters)
return counters
def govern(policy: GovernancePolicy, audit_trail=None):
"""Decorator that enforces governance policy on a tool function."""
def decorator(func):
@functools.wraps(func)
async def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
tool_name = func.__name__
start = time.monotonic()
def audit(action: str, **details):
if audit_trail is not None:
audit_trail.append({
"tool": tool_name,
"action": action,
"policy": policy.name,
"timestamp": time.time(),
**details,
})
try:
# 1. Check tool allowlist/blocklist
action = policy.check_tool(tool_name)
if action == PolicyAction.DENY:
raise PermissionError(f"Policy '{policy.name}' blocks tool '{tool_name}'")
if action == PolicyAction.REVIEW:
raise PermissionError(f"Tool '{tool_name}' requires human approval")
# 2. Check rate limit for this request/execution context
counters = _request_call_counters()
counters[policy.name] = counters.get(policy.name, 0) + 1
if counters[policy.name] > policy.max_calls_per_request:
raise PermissionError(f"Rate limit exceeded: {policy.max_calls_per_request} calls")
# 3. Check content in arguments
for arg in list(args) + list(kwargs.values()):
if isinstance(arg, str):
matched = policy.check_content(arg)
if matched:
raise PermissionError(f"Blocked pattern detected: {matched}")
except PermissionError as error:
audit("denied", reason=str(error))
raise
except Exception as error:
audit("denied", reason="governance_check_failed", error=str(error))
raise PermissionError("Governance check failed closed") from error
# 4. Execute and audit
try:
result = await func(*args, **kwargs)
audit("allowed", duration_ms=(time.monotonic() - start) * 1000)
return result
except Exception as e:
audit("error", error=str(e))
raise
return wrapper
return decorator
# Usage with any agent framework
audit_log = []
policy = GovernancePolicy(
name="search-agent",
allowed_tools=["search", "summarize"],
blocked_patterns=[r"(?i)password"],
max_calls_per_request=10
)
@govern(policy, audit_trail=audit_log)
async def search(query: str) -> str:
"""Search documents — governed by policy."""
return f"Results for: {query}"
# Passes: search("latest quarterly report")
# Blocked: search("show me the admin password")Track agent reliability over time with decay-based trust scores:
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
import math
import time
@dataclass
class TrustScore:
"""Trust score with temporal decay."""
score: float = 0.5 # 0.0 (untrusted) to 1.0 (fully trusted)
successes: int = 0
failures: int = 0
last_updated: float = field(default_factory=time.time)
def record_success(self, reward: float = 0.05):
self.successes += 1
self.score = min(1.0, self.score + reward * (1 - self.score))
self.last_updated = time.time()
def record_failure(self, penalty: float = 0.15):
self.failures += 1
self.score = max(0.0, self.score - penalty * self.score)
self.last_updated = time.time()
def current(self, decay_rate: float = 0.001) -> float:
"""Get score with temporal decay — trust erodes without activity."""
elapsed = time.time() - self.last_updated
decay = math.exp(-decay_rate * elapsed)
return self.score * decay
@property
def reliability(self) -> float:
total = self.successes + self.failures
return self.successes / total if total > 0 else 0.0
# Usage in multi-agent systems
trust = TrustScore()
# Agent completes tasks successfully
trust.record_success() # 0.525
trust.record_success() # 0.549
# Agent makes an error
trust.record_failure() # 0.467
# Gate sensitive operations on trust
if trust.current() >= 0.7:
# Allow autonomous operation
pass
elif trust.current() >= 0.4:
# Allow with human oversight
pass
else:
# Deny or require explicit approval
passMulti-agent trust: In systems where agents delegate to other agents, each agent maintains trust scores for its delegates:
class AgentTrustRegistry:
def __init__(self):
self.scores: dict[str, TrustScore] = {}
def get_trust(self, agent_id: str) -> TrustScore:
if agent_id not in self.scores:
self.scores[agent_id] = TrustScore()
return self.scores[agent_id]
def most_trusted(self, agents: list[str]) -> str:
return max(agents, key=lambda a: self.get_trust(a).current())
def meets_threshold(self, agent_id: str, threshold: float) -> bool:
return self.get_trust(agent_id).current() >= thresholdAppend-only audit log for all agent actions — critical for compliance and debugging:
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
import json
import time
@dataclass
class AuditEntry:
timestamp: float
agent_id: str
tool_name: str
action: str # "allowed", "denied", "error"
policy_name: str
details: dict = field(default_factory=dict)
class AuditTrail:
"""Append-only audit trail for agent governance events."""
def __init__(self):
self._entries: list[AuditEntry] = []
def log(self, agent_id: str, tool_name: str, action: str,
policy_name: str, **details):
self._entries.append(AuditEntry(
timestamp=time.time(),
agent_id=agent_id,
tool_name=tool_name,
action=action,
policy_name=policy_name,
details=details
))
def denied(self) -> list[AuditEntry]:
"""Get all denied actions — useful for security review."""
return [e for e in self._entries if e.action == "denied"]
def by_agent(self, agent_id: str) -> list[AuditEntry]:
return [e for e in self._entries if e.agent_id == agent_id]
def export_jsonl(self, path: str):
"""Export as JSON Lines for log aggregation systems."""
with open(path, "w") as f:
for entry in self._entries:
f.write(json.dumps({
"timestamp": entry.timestamp,
"agent_id": entry.agent_id,
"tool": entry.tool_name,
"action": entry.action,
"policy": entry.policy_name,
**entry.details
}) + "\n")These examples show where to attach the governance wrapper in common agent frameworks. Treat them as adaptation sketches and verify the exact decorator signatures, tool registration APIs, and version constraints against the framework version used in your project.
from pydantic_ai import Agent
policy = GovernancePolicy(
name="support-bot",
allowed_tools=["search_docs", "create_ticket"],
blocked_patterns=[r"(?i)(ssn|social\s+security|credit\s+card)"],
max_calls_per_request=20
)
agent = Agent("openai:gpt-4o", system_prompt="You are a support assistant.")
@agent.tool
@govern(policy)
async def search_docs(ctx, query: str) -> str:
"""Search knowledge base — governed."""
return await kb.search(query)
@agent.tool
@govern(policy)
async def create_ticket(ctx, title: str, body: str) -> str:
"""Create support ticket — governed."""
return await tickets.create(title=title, body=body)from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew
policy = GovernancePolicy(
name="research-crew",
allowed_tools=["search", "analyze"],
max_calls_per_request=30
)
# Apply governance at the crew level
def governed_crew_run(crew: Crew, policy: GovernancePolicy):
"""Wrap crew execution with governance checks."""
audit = AuditTrail()
for agent in crew.agents:
for tool in agent.tools:
original = tool.func
tool.func = govern(policy, audit_trail=audit)(original)
result = crew.kickoff()
return result, auditfrom agents import Agent, function_tool
policy = GovernancePolicy(
name="coding-agent",
allowed_tools=["read_file", "write_file", "run_tests"],
blocked_tools=["shell_exec"],
max_calls_per_request=50
)
@function_tool
@govern(policy)
async def read_file(path: str) -> str:
"""Read file contents — governed."""
from pathlib import Path
root = Path(".").resolve()
safe_path = Path(path).resolve()
if root not in safe_path.parents and safe_path != root:
raise ValueError("Path traversal blocked by governance")
with safe_path.open() as f:
return f.read()Match governance strictness to risk level:
| Level | Controls | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Open | Audit only, no restrictions | Internal dev/testing |
| Standard | Tool allowlist + content filters | General production agents |
| Strict | All controls + human approval for sensitive ops | Financial, healthcare, legal |
| Locked | Allowlist only, no dynamic tools, full audit | Compliance-critical systems |
| Practice | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Policy as configuration | Store policies in YAML/JSON, not hardcoded — enables change without deploys |
| Most-restrictive-wins | When composing policies, deny always overrides allow |
| Deterministic decisions | Use explicit policy checks for allow/deny/review rather than asking an LLM to decide permissions |
| Pre-flight intent check | Classify intent before tool execution, not after |
| Trust decay | Trust scores should decay over time — require ongoing good behavior |
| Append-only audit | Never modify or delete audit entries — immutability enables compliance |
| Audit redaction | Store enough detail to investigate, but redact secrets, credentials, and unnecessary personal data |
| Structured denials | Return consistent denial reasons so users, operators, and tests can distinguish policy failures |
| Fail closed | If governance check errors, deny the action rather than allowing it |
| Human approval for high-impact actions | Require explicit review for irreversible, external, financial, legal, or privileged operations |
| Separate policy from logic | Governance enforcement should be independent of agent business logic |
This skill includes copyable local resources:
## Agent Governance Implementation Checklist
### Setup
- [ ] Define governance policy (allowed tools, blocked patterns, rate limits)
- [ ] Choose governance level (open/standard/strict/locked)
- [ ] Set up audit trail storage
### Implementation
- [ ] Add @govern decorator to all tool functions
- [ ] Add intent classification to user input processing
- [ ] Implement trust scoring for multi-agent interactions
- [ ] Wire up audit trail export
### Validation
- [ ] Test that blocked tools are properly denied
- [ ] Test that content filters catch sensitive patterns
- [ ] Test rate limiting behavior
- [ ] Verify audit trail captures all events
- [ ] Test policy composition (most-restrictive-wins)~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.