speq-code-guardrails — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited speq-code-guardrails (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Clean Code (Martin) TDD workflow and quality guardrails.
No production code without a failing test first.
No claim without evidence. Run command, show output, then claim.
RED → Write failing test, run it, show failure
GREEN → Minimal code to pass, run test, show pass
REFACTOR → Clean up, run test + lint, show outputRun ONLY the test you created/changed — not the full suite.
| Principle | Meaning |
|---|---|
| KISS | Simplest solution that works |
| YAGNI | Build for now, not hypotheticals |
| DRY | Extract duplication, don't copy-paste |
| Single Responsibility (SOLID) | One function = one purpose |
| Boy Scout | Leave code cleaner than you found it |
| Root Cause | Five Whys — fix the source, not the symptom |
| Smell | Signal |
|---|---|
| Rigidity | Small changes cascade everywhere |
| Fragility | One change breaks unrelated code |
| Immobility | Can't reuse code elsewhere |
| Opacity | Hard to understand at a glance |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.