peer-review-prep — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited peer-review-prep (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
査読コメントへの回答レター（response letter）のドラフトを作成し、修正計画を整理します。
トリガー: 「査読対応」「reviewer response」「査読コメント」「リバイズ」
査読コメントを貼り付けてもらい、以下に分類:
| 分類 | 意味 | 対応方針 |
|---|---|---|
| Major | 根本的な修正要求 | 真摯に対応、大幅修正 |
| Minor | 軽微な修正要求 | 速やかに対応 |
| Question | 質問・確認 | 明確に回答 |
| Positive | 肯定的なコメント | 謝辞で言及 |
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Response to Reviewers
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Dear Editor and Reviewers,
We sincerely thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions.
We have carefully addressed each comment as detailed below.
Changes in the revised manuscript are highlighted in [yellow/track changes].
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
## Response to Reviewer 1
### Comment 1.1 [Major]
> [査読者のコメント原文]
**Response:**
[回答ドラフト]
**Changes made:**
- Section [X], paragraph [Y]: [具体的な修正内容]
- Added [新しい分析/議論/図表]
### Comment 1.2 [Minor]
> [査読者のコメント原文]
**Response:**
[回答ドラフト]
...
## Response to Reviewer 2
...
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━【修正タスク一覧】
| No. | 査読者 | 種別 | 内容 | 修正箇所 | 状態 |
|-----|--------|------|------|----------|------|
| 1 | R1 | Major | [内容] | 第3章 | 未着手 |
| 2 | R1 | Minor | [内容] | p.12 | 未着手 |
| 3 | R2 | Major | [内容] | 第4章 | 未着手 |「日本語で」 → 日本語の回答レターを生成「修正計画だけ」 → タスクリストのみ生成「反論を強めに」 → より assertive なトーンで~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.