project-health-auditor — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited project-health-auditor (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Inspired by claude-code-plugins-plus
Analyze codebase health across multiple dimensions: code quality, dependencies, security, testing, documentation, and architecture.
#### Complexity Analysis
# Count lines per file (identify large files)
find src -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" | xargs wc -l | sort -n
# Find long functions (over 50 lines)
# Check for deeply nested code
# Identify duplicate code patterns#### Code Smells
| Smell | Indicator | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Long files | >500 lines | Split into modules |
| Long functions | >50 lines | Extract methods |
| Deep nesting | >4 levels | Flatten logic |
| Many parameters | >5 params | Use objects |
| Duplicate code | Similar blocks | Extract shared |
| Dead code | Unused exports | Remove |
| Magic numbers | Hardcoded values | Use constants |
#### Checklist
## Code Quality Audit
- [ ] No files over 500 lines
- [ ] No functions over 50 lines
- [ ] No nesting deeper than 4 levels
- [ ] No functions with >5 parameters
- [ ] No obvious code duplication
- [ ] No dead/unused code
- [ ] Consistent naming conventions
- [ ] Proper error handling#### Dependency Health
# Check outdated packages (npm)
npm outdated
# Check for vulnerabilities
npm audit
# Analyze bundle size
npx webpack-bundle-analyzer
# Check unused dependencies
npx depcheck#### Evaluation Criteria
| Metric | Healthy | Warning | Critical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outdated (major) | 0 | 1-3 | >3 |
| Outdated (minor) | <5 | 5-10 | >10 |
| Vulnerabilities | 0 | Low/Med | High/Crit |
| Unused deps | 0 | 1-3 | >3 |
| Bundle size | <500KB | 500KB-1MB | >1MB |
#### Checklist
## Dependencies Audit
- [ ] No critical vulnerabilities
- [ ] No high vulnerabilities
- [ ] <3 major version updates pending
- [ ] No unused dependencies
- [ ] Lock file in sync
- [ ] Bundle size reasonable#### Security Checks
# Check for secrets in code
grep -r "password\|secret\|api_key\|token" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js"
# Check for hardcoded credentials
grep -r "Bearer \|Basic " --include="*.ts"
# Check .env is gitignored
cat .gitignore | grep ".env"#### Security Audit Points
| Check | Concern | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Secrets in code | Credential exposure | Use env vars |
| .env committed | Secret leak | Add to .gitignore |
| SQL strings | SQL injection | Use parameterized queries |
| User input in HTML | XSS | Sanitize/escape |
| Outdated deps | Known vulns | Update regularly |
| No rate limiting | DoS | Add rate limits |
| No input validation | Injection | Validate all inputs |
#### Checklist
## Security Audit
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets
- [ ] .env files gitignored
- [ ] Dependencies scanned for vulns
- [ ] Input validation in place
- [ ] Output encoding for XSS
- [ ] SQL injection prevention
- [ ] Authentication implemented
- [ ] Authorization checks exist#### Test Coverage Analysis
# Run tests with coverage (npm/jest)
npm test -- --coverage
# Run tests with coverage (pytest)
pytest --cov=src --cov-report=html#### Coverage Standards
| Metric | Good | Acceptable | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Line coverage | >80% | 60-80% | <60% |
| Branch coverage | >70% | 50-70% | <50% |
| Function coverage | >80% | 60-80% | <60% |
#### Checklist
## Testing Audit
- [ ] Unit tests exist
- [ ] Integration tests exist
- [ ] Line coverage >60%
- [ ] Critical paths tested
- [ ] Edge cases covered
- [ ] Tests run in CI
- [ ] Test execution <5 min
- [ ] No flaky tests#### Documentation Inventory
# Check for README
ls README.md
# Check for API docs
ls docs/ || ls documentation/
# Check for inline docs (JSDoc, docstrings)
grep -r "@param\|@returns\|Args:\|Returns:" src/#### Documentation Standards
| Doc Type | Purpose | Required |
|---|---|---|
| README.md | Project overview | Always |
| CONTRIBUTING.md | Contribution guide | Open source |
| API docs | Endpoint reference | APIs |
| Code comments | Complex logic | As needed |
| Architecture docs | System design | Large projects |
| CHANGELOG.md | Version history | Libraries |
#### Checklist
## Documentation Audit
- [ ] README exists and current
- [ ] Installation instructions
- [ ] Usage examples
- [ ] API documentation
- [ ] Contributing guide
- [ ] License specified
- [ ] Complex code documented#### Architecture Review
| Aspect | Check | Concern |
|---|---|---|
| Coupling | Import chains | Tight coupling |
| Cohesion | Module size | God modules |
| Layers | Directory structure | Layer violations |
| Dependencies | Package.json | Circular deps |
| Config | Hardcoded values | Environment issues |
#### Common Issues
## Architecture Smells
- Circular dependencies
- God classes/modules
- Feature envy (cross-module reaching)
- Shotgun surgery (changes touch many files)
- Inappropriate intimacy (modules know too much)#### Checklist
## Architecture Audit
- [ ] Clear module boundaries
- [ ] No circular dependencies
- [ ] Proper layer separation
- [ ] Configuration externalized
- [ ] Environment-specific settings
- [ ] Scalability considered
- [ ] Single responsibility# Project Health Report
**Project:** [Name]
**Date:** [Date]
**Auditor:** Claude
## Summary
| Category | Score | Status |
|----------|-------|--------|
| Code Quality | X/10 | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| Dependencies | X/10 | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| Security | X/10 | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| Testing | X/10 | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| Documentation | X/10 | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| Architecture | X/10 | 🟢/🟡/🔴 |
| **Overall** | **X/10** | **Status** |
## Critical Issues (Fix Immediately)
1. [Issue description]
2. [Issue description]
## High Priority (Fix Soon)
1. [Issue description]
2. [Issue description]
## Recommendations
1. [Recommendation]
2. [Recommendation]
## Technical Debt
- [Debt item with estimated effort]
- [Debt item with estimated effort]# Full audit script
echo "=== Code Stats ===" && cloc src/
echo "=== Dependencies ===" && npm outdated
echo "=== Security ===" && npm audit
echo "=== Test Coverage ===" && npm test -- --coverage
echo "=== TODO/FIXME ===" && grep -r "TODO\|FIXME" src/~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.