mark-rejected — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited mark-rejected (Agent Skill) and scored it 96/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 1 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 1 flagged
A bulleted imperative like {match} tells the agent to never reveal, disclose, or mention something to the user. Used adversarially it can instruct the agent to hide its tool calls or lie about what it did — stripping the transparency a user relies on to trust the agent.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Update List.xlsx for a company that rejected you: set column D to Rejected and apply strikethrough formatting across columns A–F.
Run the bundled script at .claude/skills/mark-rejected/scripts/mark_rejected.py with the company name as the argument, from the project root.
The script finds all rows where column A contains the company name (case-insensitive substring match), sets column D to Rejected, applies strikethrough to columns A–F while preserving existing font properties, and saves the file. It handles PermissionError automatically via a temp copy if the file is open in Excel.
Check the output — it reports the row number and company name for each row updated. If multiple unexpected rows matched, the company name was too broad. Revert any wrong rows manually in Excel (remove strikethrough, restore the original status).
The daily email will automatically show ❌ Rejected for that company on the next run.
Open List.xlsx manually, find the company row, type Rejected in column D, select cells A–F, open Format Cells (Ctrl+1), go to the Font tab, and check Strikethrough.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.