revision-notes-generator — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited revision-notes-generator (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Generate accurate, self-contained revision notes in markdown from a source PDF or Markdown file. The notes must give complete understanding of the topic without the reader needing the source or any external material.
Coverage (the floor). Every subheading, definition, equation, named process, method, and stated condition in the source must appear in the notes, however compressed. Omitting a method step (e.g. "maximum height occurs when vertical velocity = 0") is a coverage failure even if the surrounding topic is included.
Signal density (the style). Every sentence must define, explain, or connect a concept. No restating headings, no filler ("it is important to note"), no redundancy. Length is not capped: a long, dense source produces long, dense notes. Conciseness means zero noise, not brevity.
Self-contained. The reader must never need to consult the source. Where the source relies on a diagram, translate its content into prose, a table, or a structured description. Never write "see source" or "see diagram on page X".
Fidelity with flagged additions. Reproduce the source faithfully. Adding correct knowledge beyond the source is permitted when it is needed for complete understanding (e.g. the source omits a spec point, or two source statements would otherwise appear contradictory), but every addition must be marked inline with the format:
(Beyond source: [the added fact].)
Only mark content that genuinely does not appear anywhere in the source, including its tip boxes, examiner notes, and worked examples. Any addition must be reconciled with nearby source content so the notes never contradict themselves.
Worked examples. Where a source worked example teaches a reusable method (conservation-law checks, SUVAT strategy, deducing quark composition, equilibrium proofs), compress it into a short inline example showing the method. Omit worked examples that only substitute numbers into an already-stated formula.
Error flagging. If a source statement appears to conflict with standard A-Level treatment, keep the source version but append a flag immediately after it:
⚠ Check: source states X; standard treatment is Y.
Never silently "correct" the source.
Tier labelling (GCSE sources only). If the source distinguishes Higher Tier content, label it (HT). A-Level sources have no tiers; skip this entirely.
### 4.1.3 Motion Along a Straight Line) for cross-referencing; exclude sub-clause spec codes (e.g. "1.1.3 a)") and source formatting artefacts (page references, "Your notes" margins, branding)$...$ inline, $$...$$ display)Before outputting, check each item and fix any failure:
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.