discuss-d260ef — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited discuss-d260ef (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
When invoked, treat this as the start of a genuine discussion about the task, not a clarification checklist.
Before doing any work:
the task references existing code, files, or project structure, briefly inspect the relevant parts before asking anything, so your questions cite real specifics ("you currently do X in foo.ts, do you want this to change?") rather than abstractions. Keep the scan light — enough to ask informed questions, not a full audit. Skip this for greenfield or non-code tasks.
be, the assumptions you are making, and anything that looks like a key decision or trade-off. Engage with the specifics of this task.
Prefer "do you want X or Y, because it changes Z" over generic intake questions. Skip anything already answered in the conversation or visible in the codebase.
so I can react to it rather than answer cold.
Delivery style is your judgement. Default to one small batch of 3-5 questions. Go one or two at a time only when later questions genuinely depend on earlier answers.
Do not start the task until I have responded. After my answers:
confirmation.
/discuss plan), always proposea plan after gathering answers, regardless of task complexity.
line (e.g. "proceeding with X and Y assumed") so nothing slips through silently.
Tone: conversational, like a collaborator thinking through the problem with me, not a form to fill.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.