A Claude/Qwen/Gemini skill for institutional-grade investment research. Connects to live market data via MCP servers to deliver company deep dives, due diligence reports, competitive landscape analysis, market sentiment, and DCF-based intrinsic value estimates — all from natural
SaferSkills independently audited deep-financial-research (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Comprehensive financial research skill leveraging connected MCP servers for institutional-grade investment analysis. Includes integrated DCF valuation subskill.
| Server | Status | Capabilities |
|---|---|---|
| exa | ✅ Connected | Neural web search, news, sentiment, citation extraction |
| financial-datasets | ✅ Connected | Real-time prices, fundamentals, insider trades, analyst estimates |
| lightpanda | ⚠️ Optional | Browser automation (requires separate setup) |
| Subskill | Trigger | Description |
|---|---|---|
| dcf-valuation | "DCF", "intrinsic value", "fair value", "undervalued" | Discounted cash flow valuation with sensitivity analysis |
Steps:
Steps:
"[company] lawsuit SEC investigation""[company] restatement audit resignation"Steps:
"[industry] market share competitive landscape"Trigger: User asks for valuation, fair value, intrinsic value, or DCF
Steps:
📄 Full DCF workflow: subskills/dcf-valuation/SKILL.mdSteps:
### [Company/Ticker] - Deep Research Summary
**Current Price:** $X (as of [timestamp])
**Business Overview:**
[1-2 sentence description]
**Key Metrics:**
| Metric | Value | YoY |
|--------|-------|-----|
| Revenue | $X | X% |
| P/E | X.x | - |
| Market Cap | $X | - |
**Recent Developments:**
- [News item 1] — [Source](url)
**Bull Case:** [2-3 key arguments]
**Bear Case:** [2-3 key arguments]
**Key Risks:** [Main risks]
**Confidence:** [High/Medium/Low]### DCF Valuation: [Company] ([TICKER])
#### Valuation Summary
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| **Current Price** | $XX.XX |
| **Fair Value** | $XX.XX |
| **Upside/(Downside)** | +XX.X% |
| **Verdict** | Undervalued / Fairly Valued / Overvalued |
#### Key Assumptions
| Input | Value | Source/Notes |
|-------|-------|--------------|
| Current FCF | $X.XXB | Financial Datasets (TTM) |
| FCF Growth Rate (5Y) | X.X% | [CAGR/analyst estimates] |
| Terminal Growth | 2.5% | GDP growth proxy |
| WACC | X.X% | [Sector] adjustment |
#### Sensitivity Analysis
| WACC \ Terminal | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% |
|-----------------|------|------|------|
| [WACC-1%] | $XXX | $XXX | $XXX |
| [Base WACC] | $XXX | $XXX | $XXX |
| [WACC+1%] | $XXX | $XXX | $XXX |
**Conclusion:** [Undervalued/Fairly valued/Overvalued] with [X%] upside/downside.User: "Do a deep dive on NVDA" → Execute Workflow 1 (Company Deep Dive)
User: "Research Tesla for investment" → Execute Workflow 2 (Due Diligence)
User: "What's NVDA worth based on DCF?" → Execute Workflow 4 (DCF Valuation subskill)
User: "Get real-time NVDA price" → Use Financial Datasets MCP for price and stats
User: "Analyze the AI chip competitive landscape" → Execute Workflow 3 (Competitive Landscape)
User: "Do a deep dive on AAPL with DCF valuation" → Execute Workflow 1 + Workflow 4 (combined analysis)
Financial Datasets MCP Tools:
Exa MCP Tools:
| Issue | Response |
|---|---|
| MCP server unavailable | Inform user, use native knowledge with caveats |
| Tool timeout | Retry once, proceed with available data |
| Data discrepancy | Note discrepancy, cite both sources |
| Incomplete data | Clearly state what's missing |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.