wrap — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited wrap (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Quick, intentional session ending. Preserves work, ensures continuity.
The flow: surface → route → task-housekeep → handoff → capture
The compound moment. One intentional sweep, two questions:
Surface everything. Name it, but don't route yet (that's Step 1).
Unlike /floor (open-ended exploration), /wrap is a focused scan for what's hanging and what compounded. If nothing is there, say so and move on.
Why this is first: AI thoughts get episodic windows that dissolve at session end. If threads and patterns don't get surfaced before the wrap machinery starts, they're gone. The structure creates the moment; the instinct fills it.
Take what you surfaced in Step 0 and route each item where it belongs:
| What surfaced | Where it goes |
|---|---|
| Pattern or lesson learned | A rules file, or the system's working docs |
| System friction (skill gap, stale doc) | Fix it NOW — you have context, next-you won't |
| Reflection or half-formed idea | AI's space (ai/ is a good default, or opus/) |
| Operational thread / "what's next" | ALIVE.md |
| Specific to a task | That task's HOW or OBSERVATIONS section |
Routing priorities:
All task-doc maintenance in one pass. In all task docs touched this session (not just the "main" one, alignment sessions and cross-cutting work touch multiple):
HOW section:
OBSERVATIONS section:
YAML:
status: doneIf a task is done-done:
status: donetasks/_done/ — the thinking is worth keepingUpdate ALIVE.md with a pointer for next-you (human and AI):
Forward-reason, don't summarize. Write "where to start" by working through "if I were next-us tomorrow, what would I actually do, in order?" — capture the ordered steps AND the reasoning that produced the sequence so next-you inherits the sequencing logic, not just the conclusion. Especially load-bearing when the session reframed something mid-flow (the reasoning preserves why the sequence shifted).
Rewrite ≠ compression. The previous "where to start" often carries specific texture (a slide candidate, a particular creative next move) that doesn't live anywhere else. Before dropping an outstanding item, check: does its texture exist elsewhere? If yes, safe to compress. If no, either keep it here OR migrate the texture first. Compressing to "unchanged from last thread" is where next-us silently loses threads that had nowhere to land.
ALIVE.md is 50/50 — the human writes brain dumps and ideas there, AI writes the handoff. Both of you use it.
Do this last so the full wrap is in the session before /sync pulls from it.
Use /sync to extract the conversation to a session file. The wrap itself is part of the session — decisions made, items reordered, observations noted. If you capture before wrapping, you lose the wrap.
status: done, move to tasks/_done/.ALIVE.md (1-3 start points + last session breadcrumb)./sync to preserve the conversation.Capture (LAST) = full session in the LOG. Everything above gets captured.
Do it:
Skip it:
Quick scan: anything about this wrap that felt off or could be smoother?
If yes → update this skill now. The improvement compounds.
If no → move on. Not every wrap teaches something.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.