java-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited java-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Review the Java code I've selected or provided. Follow these steps:
Check the project for pom.xml (look for <java.version> or <maven.compiler.source>) or build.gradle (look for sourceCompatibility). If not found, ask: "What Java version are you targeting? (8, 11, 17, 21, or other)"
Optional<T> (Java 8+) for values that may be absentInputStream, Connection, PreparedStatement; suggest try-with-resourcesPascalCasecamelCaseSCREAMING_SNAKE_CASEi, j, k)usr → user, mgr → manager)For each suggestion involving a version-gated feature, state: "Requires Java X+"
Closeable resourcesvar where the type is obvious from the right-hand sideinstanceof chainsRespond with:
Be concise. Each issue: one sentence description + one-line fix example.
After completing this review, offer these follow-up actions based on findings:
/java-refactor/java-testjava-security-reviewer agentjava-performance-reviewer agent/java-docs~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.