abap — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited abap (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Check and improve ABAP code quality using two complementary approaches:
abaplint is installed (npx @abaplint/cli --version or abaplint --version)npm install @abaplint/cli -gabaplint.json exists in the project rootreferences/abaplint.md)abaplint in the project root directoryRun in project root:
abaplintGenerate default config (all rules):
abaplint -d > abaplint.jsonFor detailed abaplint configuration including starter configs for On-Premise, Steampunk/BTP, and HANA compatibility, read references/abaplint.md.
Structure analysis results as:
# ABAP Check Results
## abaplint Findings
[abaplint output, grouped by severity]
## Clean ABAP Review
### Summary
- Total Issues: [count]
- Critical: [count] | Major: [count] | Minor: [count]
### Critical Issues
#### [Category] - [Issue Title]
**Location:** Line [X] / Method [name]
**Problem:** [description]
**Recommendation:** [how to fix]
### Major Issues
[Same format]
### Minor Issues
[Same format]
### Positive Observations
- [Things done well]references/abaplint.md for installation, configuration options, and starter configsreferences/CleanABAP.md for full style guide with rationale and examplesreferences/quick-reference.md for condensed good/bad code examplesreferences/checklist.md for systematic review checklist~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.