Paths: File paths (references/, ../ln-*) are relative to this skill directory.

Maintainability/Structure Auditor (L3 Worker)

Type: L3 Worker

Specialized worker auditing test file organization, orphan tests, fragmented duplicates, and layout drift for maintainability as the test suite grows.

Purpose & Scope

• Audit Test Maintainability/Structure (Category 8: Medium Priority)
• Detect layout pattern (flat / mirrored / co-located / hybrid)
• Flag flat directories exceeding growth thresholds with domain grouping recommendations
• Verify test-to-source mapping consistency, orphaned tests, and fragmented duplicates
• Emit MOVE, MERGE, or DELETE_ORPHAN
• Calculate compliance score (X/10)

Inputs

MANDATORY READ: Load references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

Receives contextStore with: tech_stack, testFilesMetadata (ALL types -- both automated and manual), codebase_root, output_dir, domain_mode, all_domains.

Note: Unlike other workers that receive type-filtered metadata, this worker receives ALL test files because directory structure analysis requires the full picture of where both automated and manual tests are placed.

Workflow

Detection policy: use two-layer detection (candidate scan, then context verification); load references/two_layer_detection.md only when the verification method is ambiguous.

1) Parse Context: Extract test file list, output_dir, codebase_root, domain info from contextStore 2) Map Source Structure: Glob source directories (src/, app/, lib/) to build source domain/module tree 3) Map Test Structure: Group test files by parent directory, count files per directory, classify locations 4) Scan Checks (Layer 1): Run 6 audit checks (see Audit Rules) using Glob/Grep patterns 5) Context Analysis (Layer 2 -- MANDATORY): For each candidate finding, apply Layer 2 filters (see each check) 6) Collect Findings: Record violations with severity, location, effort, action, recommendation 7) Calculate Score: Count violations by severity, calculate compliance score (X/10) 8) Write Report: Build full markdown report in memory per references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md, write to {output_dir}/ln-637--global.md in single Write call 9) Return Summary: Return minimal summary to coordinator (see Output Format)

Audit Rules

1. Layout Pattern Detection

What: Detect which test organization pattern the project uses and check for unintentional mixing

Detection:

• Classify each test file location:
• Co-located: test file in same directory as source file (e.g., src/users/users.test.ts)
• Mirrored: test file in parallel hierarchy (e.g., tests/users/users.test.ts mirrors src/users/)
• Centralized-flat: all tests in single directory (e.g., tests/ or __tests__/)
• Manual: files in tests/manual/ (informational, not flagged)
• Calculate distribution percentages across patterns
• If >70% files follow one pattern -> that is the dominant pattern
• If no pattern reaches 70% -> hybrid

Layer 2:

• Hybrid is acceptable if different test TYPES use different patterns (e.g., unit tests co-located + integration tests in tests/automated/integration/). Check if deviation correlates with test type
• Projects with <5 test files -> skip (too small to establish pattern)

Severity: MEDIUM if hybrid without clear type-based rule (>30% of same-type tests deviate from dominant pattern)

Recommendation: Standardize test placement -- choose one pattern per test type and document in testing guidelines Action: MOVE

Effort: L

2. Test-to-Source Mapping

What: Detect orphaned test files (source file deleted but test remains) and mismatched paths

Detection:

• For each test file, extract the implied source module:
• users.test.ts -> users.ts or users/index.ts
• test_payments.py -> payments.py
• Check if the implied source file exists in the expected location
• If source file not found -> orphaned test candidate

Layer 2:

• Skip integration/e2e tests (test multiple modules, no 1:1 source mapping)
• Skip tests in centralized-flat layout (no path-based mapping expected)
• Skip test files that import from multiple source modules (integration tests by nature)
• Skip utility/helper test files (test_utils.ts, test_helpers.py)

Severity: MEDIUM for orphaned tests (dead code), LOW for path mismatches

Recommendation: Delete orphaned tests or update to match current source structure Action: DELETE_ORPHAN when the source behavior no longer exists; otherwise MOVE

Effort: S

3. Flat Directory Growth

What: Detect test directories with excessive file count that would benefit from subdirectory grouping

Detection:

• Count test files per directory (excluding node_modules, dist, build)
• Thresholds:
• 15-20 files in one flat directory -> LOW (approaching limit)
• \>20 files in one flat directory -> MEDIUM (restructure recommended)
• For MEDIUM findings, suggest domain-based grouping by analyzing file name prefixes:
• Group by common prefix (e.g., test_auth_*.py -> auth/ subdirectory)
• Cross-reference with source domain structure if available

Layer 2:

• Skip if directory already has subdirectories (partially organized)
• Skip if files use clear naming prefixes that provide sufficient organization without subdirectories
• Skip tests/manual/ (manual test structure has separate conventions)

Severity: MEDIUM (>20 files), LOW (15-20 files)

Recommendation: Group tests into subdirectories by domain/feature. Suggest specific grouping based on file name analysis:

# Before (flat):
tests/test_auth_login.py, tests/test_auth_tokens.py, tests/test_users_crud.py, ...

# After (grouped):
tests/auth/test_login.py, tests/auth/test_tokens.py, tests/users/test_crud.py, ...

Effort: M Action: MOVE

4. Domain Grouping Alignment

What: Check whether test directory grouping mirrors source domain structure

Detection:

• Compare source domain directories (from all_domains or scanned src/) with test directory names
• For each source domain, check if a corresponding test group exists:
• Mirrored layout: tests/{domain}/ directory exists
• Co-located: test files exist in src/{domain}/
• Flag source domains with zero corresponding test groups

Layer 2:

• Skip if project has no clear domain structure (domain_mode="global" or <2 source domains)
• Skip references/common/utils domains (cross-cutting, may not need dedicated test group)
• Skip if project uses centralized-flat layout (no grouping expected)

Severity: MEDIUM for domains with >5 source files but no test group, LOW otherwise

Recommendation: Create test directory/group for domain to maintain structural alignment

Effort: M Action: MOVE

5. Co-location Consistency

What: Detect which co-location pattern the project uses and flag inconsistencies

Detection:

• Count test files placed next to source files vs. in dedicated test directories
• Calculate ratio: co-located / (co-located + centralized)
• If ratio 0.0-0.2 -> centralized pattern
• If ratio 0.8-1.0 -> co-located pattern
• If ratio 0.2-0.8 -> mixed (potential inconsistency)
• For mixed: identify which modules deviate from the dominant pattern

Layer 2:

• Mixed is acceptable if different test types use different placement:
• Unit tests co-located + integration/e2e tests centralized -> valid hybrid
• Check test file naming/location correlation with type
• Projects with <5 test files -> skip

Severity: MEDIUM if >20% of same-type tests deviate from dominant placement pattern

Recommendation: Consolidate test placement -- move deviating tests to follow the project's dominant pattern

Effort: M-L Action: MOVE

6. Fragmented Duplicates

What: Detect duplicate or near-duplicate tests scattered across files where one canonical test would be easier to maintain

Detection:

• Group tests by imported source module and test description keywords
• Look for repeated setup blocks, repeated assertions, and duplicate scenario names across files
• Compare test files with overlapping source imports and similar arrange/assert text

Layer 2:

• Skip intentional matrix tests where each file covers a distinct environment, adapter, provider, or browser
• Skip duplicated names when assertions cover different product behavior
• Skip duplication already reported as E2E waste by ln-632; this worker only owns structural fragmentation

Severity: MEDIUM when duplicate structure increases maintenance cost, LOW for small localized duplication

Recommendation: Merge duplicate tests into one canonical location or shared helper when it preserves product signal

Effort: S-M Action: MERGE

Scoring Algorithm

MANDATORY READ: Load references/audit_scoring.md.

Severity mapping:

• Orphaned tests, Excessive flat directory (>20), Inconsistent layout, Inconsistent co-location, Fragmented duplicates -> MEDIUM
• Approaching flat directory limit (15-20), Missing domain test group (small domain), Path mismatch -> LOW

Output Format

MANDATORY READ: Load references/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

Write JSON summary per references/audit_summary_contract.md. In managed mode the caller passes both runId and summaryArtifactPath; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.

Write report to {output_dir}/ln-637--global.md with category: "Test Maintainability" and checks: layout_pattern, test_source_mapping, flat_dir_growth, domain_grouping, colocation_consistency, fragmented_duplicates.

Return summary per references/audit_summary_contract.md.

When summaryArtifactPath is absent, write the standalone runtime summary under .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/evaluation-worker/{worker}--{identifier}.json and optionally echo the same summary in structured output.

Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/ln-637--global.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)

Critical Rules

Apply the already-loaded references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

• Do not auto-fix: Report only, suggest restructuring
• Effort realism: S = <1h, M = 1-4h, L = >4h
• Skip when trivial: If <5 test files total, return score 10/10 with zero findings
• No naming check: Test naming consistency (.test. vs .spec.) is out of scope -- do not duplicate
• Both types: Analyze both automated and manual test file locations for complete layout picture
• Concrete suggestions: For flat directory growth findings, always suggest specific subdirectory grouping based on file name prefix analysis
• Unique angle: Audit only maintainability and structure. Do not evaluate product behavior, E2E journey value, portfolio value, missing coverage, trustworthiness, oracle strength, or manual evidence quality.
• Action required: Every finding uses one of MOVE, MERGE, or DELETE_ORPHAN.

Definition of Done

Apply the already-loaded references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

• [ ] contextStore parsed successfully (including output_dir, domain info)
• [ ] Source structure mapped (domain/module tree)
• [ ] Test structure mapped (files grouped by directory, counts calculated)
• [ ] All 6 checks completed
• [ ] Layer 2 context analysis applied (type-based hybrid, small project exclusions)
• [ ] Layout pattern detected and documented in report
• [ ] Flat directory growth signals identified with specific grouping suggestions
• [ ] Findings collected with severity, location, effort, action, recommendation
• [ ] Score calculated using penalty algorithm
• [ ] Report written to {output_dir}/ln-637--global.md (atomic single Write call)
• [ ] Summary written per contract

Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-03-15