anyskill— agent skill

anyskill — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.

Is anyskill safe to install?

SaferSkills independently audited anyskill (Agent Skill) and scored it 83/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 4 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.

Score
83/100
●●●●●●●●○○
↑ +0 since first scan (83 → 83)Re-scan~30s
Latest scan
ScannedJun 23, 2026 · 34d ago
Scans run1 over 90 days
Detectors55 checks · 5 categories
Findings4 warnings · 0 high
EngineSaferSkills 2b638c6
View methodology →
SaferSkills installs
This week0
This month0
All time0
CategoryWeightCategory scoreContribution
Securityprompt, exec, net, exfil, eval
35%
52
18.2 pts
Supply chainhash, typosquat, maintainer, lockfile
20%
100
20.0 pts
Maintenancestaleness, pinning, CI
15%
100
15.0 pts
TransparencySKILL.md, perms, README
15%
100
15.0 pts
Communityinstalls, verify, response
15%
100
15.0 pts

Findings & checks · 4 flagged

Securityscore 52 · 4 findings
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · skills/anyskill/SKILL.md×2
MEDIUMit fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptskills/anyskill/SKILL.md· markdown
1471. Check if environment variable `ANYSKILL_GITHUB_TOKEN` exists.
1482. If it **exists** (meaning the user has previously configured AnySkill on this machine):
149- **Do not ask the user for a Token**, directly jump to "Path B: User only provided a Token"
… (27 chars elided on L149)
150- The entire process should be silent to the user: AI auto-detects cloud repo → confirms mou
… (34 chars elided on L150)
1513. If it **does not exist**, then initiate the guided conversation (see below).
Occurrences
2 occurrences · first at L149, also L566
Show all 2 locations
Line
File
L149
skills/anyskill/SKILL.md
L566
skills/anyskill/SKILL.md
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha25668b030f55bcd484arubric 365aacaView on GitHub
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · README.md
MEDIUMit fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptREADME.md· markdown
440|---|---|
441| [`amazon-price-tracker`](skills/amazon-price-tracker/) | 实时监控亚马逊商品价格,设置降价提醒,追踪历史价格曲线。帮助买家低
… (13 chars elided on L441)
442| [`food-order`](skills/food-order/) | Reorder Foodora orders + track ETA/status with orderc
… (49 chars elided on L442)
443| [`linkedin`](skills/linkedin/) | LinkedIn automation via browser relay or cookies for mess
… (45 chars elided on L443)
444| [`news-summary`](skills/news-summary/) | This skill should be used when the user asks for
… (53 chars elided on L444)
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L442
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha25666786b2632885670rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
MEDIUMInstruction telling the agent not to ask for approvalSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01 · Prompt injection · README.zh-CN.md
MEDIUMit fires on intent; the real damage depends on the host agent's own approval-gating.
Why it matters

The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.

The exact value spotted
excerptREADME.zh-CN.md· markdown
388|---|---|
389| [`amazon-price-tracker`](skills/amazon-price-tracker/) | 实时监控亚马逊商品价格,设置降价提醒,追踪历史价格曲线。帮助买家低
… (13 chars elided on L389)
390| [`food-order`](skills/food-order/) | Reorder Foodora orders + track ETA/status with orderc
… (49 chars elided on L390)
391| [`linkedin`](skills/linkedin/) | LinkedIn automation via browser relay or cookies for mess
… (45 chars elided on L391)
392| [`news-summary`](skills/news-summary/) | This skill should be used when the user asks for
… (53 chars elided on L392)
Occurrences
1 occurrence · at L390
How to fix
Remove the approval-skipping instruction, or scope it narrowly to a specific safe, reversible action.
  1. Delete blanket "don't ask / no need to confirm" directives from the skill.
  2. If the skill is a genuine autonomous job, restrict the opt-out to a named non-destructive action rather than all actions.
Framework references
OWASPLLM01ATLASAML.T0051
Trace & refs
ruleSS-SKILL-INJECT-DONT-ASK-01sha25666786b2632885670rubric 365aacaView on GitHub
Supply chainscore 100 · 0 findings
All supply chain checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Maintenancescore 100 · 0 findings
All maintenance checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Transparencyscore 100 · 0 findings
All transparency checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Communityscore 100 · 0 findings
All community checks passedNo findings in this category for the latest scan.pass
Vendor response · right of reply
Are you the maintainer? Submit a response →

Audit the pieces. Scan the whole. Decide.

~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.