web-design-guidelines — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited web-design-guidelines (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Review files for compliance with Web Interface Guidelines.
As of 2026-10-11, command.md omits some accessibility checks; for accessibility reviews also check contrast (WCAG 2.2 AA: text 4.5:1, large text and required non-text UI contrast 3:1, with applicable exceptions), status not shown by colour alone, target size (WCAG 2.5.8: >=24 by 24 CSS px with its exceptions; 44px on touch is advisory), mobile input font-size >=16px, and focus moving into and back from modal dialogs per the APG dialog pattern.
file:line formatFetch fresh guidelines before each review:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vercel-labs/web-interface-guidelines/main/command.mdRetrieve the complete rules with an available web or shell tool. A fetch tool that returns a summary (such as Claude Code's WebFetch) may omit rules; when the shell has network access, curl the raw URL instead. Without web access, use the pinned snapshot references/command.md and say in the review that it used the snapshot and its date.
When a user provides a file or pattern argument:
If no files specified, ask the user which files to review.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.