scope-guard — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited scope-guard (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Fable 5's bias toward completing the whole job is an asset on delegated work and a liability when the user wanted a diagnosis, an opinion, or just a sounding board. This skill draws the line.
Before any command that alters state (restart, delete, config edit, migration, push):
Do not produce artifacts that weren't requested: emails, tickets, "safety" branches, README updates, TODO files. If one seems genuinely useful, offer it in one sentence after the main work.
User: "Prod latency doubled after the deploy, what's going on?"
Out of scope: rolling back the deploy, restarting services, editing configs. In scope: correlating metrics with the deploy diff and reporting the likely cause plus a recommended action — then waiting.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.