code-change-verification — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited code-change-verification (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Check which config files exist at the repo root:
scripts/detect-stack.shThe script outputs one of: python, typescript, python+typescript, unknown.
If output is unknown: ask the user which stack to verify before continuing.
Run the appropriate commands based on detected stack.
scripts/verify-python.shExpected output on success:
[format] ✅ passed
[lint] ✅ passed
[typecheck] ✅ passed
[tests] ✅ passed (N tests, 0 failed)scripts/verify-typescript.shExpected output on success:
[install] ✅ passed
[build] ✅ passed
[lint] ✅ passed
[tests] ✅ passed (N tests, 0 failed)Run Python script first, then TypeScript. Both must pass before proceeding.
If all checks pass: Report: Verification complete — all checks passed. Safe to commit. No further action required.
If any check fails:
Verification failed — [N] check(s) failed:
❌ [check name]: [error summary in one line]
Fix: [specific action to take]
❌ [check name]: [error summary in one line]
Fix: [specific action to take]
Do not commit until all checks pass.See references/common-errors.md for known error patterns and their fixes.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.