market-seo — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited market-seo (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Perform a comprehensive SEO audit of a webpage or website, covering on-page SEO, content quality (E-E-A-T), keyword analysis, technical SEO, and content strategy. This skill combines automated analysis via scripts/analyze_page.py with expert-level manual review to produce an actionable SEO audit document.
/market seo <url> or /market seoUse the Python analysis script to gather baseline data:
python3 scripts/analyze_page.py <url>This script extracts:
Capture the JSON output and use it as the foundation for the manual analysis.
Evaluate each element and score it as Pass, Needs Work, or Fail.
#### Title Tag
| Criteria | Best Practice | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Exists | Every page must have a unique title tag | Pass/Fail |
| Length | 50-60 characters (displays fully in SERPs) | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Primary keyword | Contains the primary target keyword | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Keyword position | Primary keyword appears near the beginning | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Brand name | Includes brand name (typically at the end, separated by pipe or dash) | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Uniqueness | Different from other pages on the site | Pass/Fail |
| Compelling | Would a searcher want to click this? | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
Common title tag mistakes:
#### Meta Description
| Criteria | Best Practice | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Exists | Every page should have a meta description | Pass/Fail |
| Length | 150-160 characters | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Primary keyword | Naturally includes the target keyword | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Call to action | Includes a reason to click | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Unique | Different from other pages | Pass/Fail |
| Compelling | Acts as ad copy for the search result | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
#### Heading Hierarchy (H1-H6)
| Criteria | Best Practice | Check |
|---|---|---|
| H1 exists | Exactly one H1 per page | Pass/Fail |
| H1 contains keyword | Primary keyword in the H1 | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| H1 differs from title | H1 and title tag are different (but related) | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Logical hierarchy | H2 under H1, H3 under H2 (no skipping levels) | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Descriptive subheadings | H2s and H3s describe content sections clearly | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Keywords in subheadings | Secondary keywords appear naturally in H2s/H3s | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Not overused | Headers used for structure, not styling | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
#### Image Optimization
| Criteria | Best Practice | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Alt text | Every image has descriptive alt text | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Alt text quality | Alt text describes the image and includes keywords naturally | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| File names | Descriptive filenames (not IMG_001.jpg) | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| File size | Images optimized for web (WebP preferred, compressed) | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Lazy loading | Below-fold images use lazy loading | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Responsive images | Uses srcset or picture element for different sizes | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Decorative images | Decorative images have empty alt="" (not missing alt) | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
#### Internal Linking
| Criteria | Best Practice | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Internal links present | Page links to other relevant pages on the site | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Anchor text | Internal link anchor text is descriptive (not "click here") | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Deep linking | Links go to specific pages, not just homepage | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Relevant context | Links are contextually relevant to surrounding content | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Reasonable count | 3-10 internal links per 1,000 words of content | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Broken links | No broken internal links (404s) | Pass/Fail |
#### URL Structure
| Criteria | Best Practice | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Readable | URL is human-readable and descriptive | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Keywords | URL contains relevant keywords | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Length | Under 75 characters (ideally under 60) | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Hyphens | Words separated by hyphens (not underscores) | Pass/Fail |
| Lowercase | All lowercase characters | Pass/Fail |
| No parameters | Clean URLs without unnecessary query parameters | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
| Trailing slashes | Consistent use (either always or never) | Pass/Needs Work/Fail |
Evaluate the content against Google's E-E-A-T framework:
#### Experience Does the content demonstrate first-hand experience with the topic?
Check for:
Score: Strong / Present / Weak / Missing
#### Expertise Does the author have demonstrated knowledge in this subject?
Check for:
Score: Strong / Present / Weak / Missing
#### Authoritativeness Is the website and author recognized as an authority on this topic?
Check for:
Score: Strong / Present / Weak / Missing
#### Trustworthiness Can users trust this content and this website?
Check for:
Score: Strong / Present / Weak / Missing
#### Primary Keyword Assessment
| Element | Evaluation |
|---|---|
| Primary keyword identified | What keyword is this page targeting? |
| Search intent alignment | Does the content match what searchers expect? (informational, commercial, transactional, navigational) |
| Keyword in title | Present, position, natural usage |
| Keyword in H1 | Present, natural usage |
| Keyword in first 100 words | Appears early in the content |
| Keyword in subheadings | Appears in at least one H2 or H3 |
| Keyword in meta description | Present and natural |
| Keyword in URL | Present |
| Keyword density | 1-2% is ideal. Over 3% is keyword stuffing. |
#### Secondary Keywords Identify 5-10 related keywords that should be naturally included in the content:
#### Search Intent Analysis Determine the search intent behind the target keyword and evaluate if the content matches:
| Intent Type | User Goal | Content Should Be |
|---|---|---|
| Informational | Learn something | Blog post, guide, tutorial, FAQ |
| Commercial | Compare options | Comparison page, review, list |
| Transactional | Buy something | Product page, pricing page, checkout |
| Navigational | Find a specific page | Homepage, login page, specific tool |
Misalignment is a ranking killer. If the user searches "how to do X" (informational) and lands on a sales page (transactional), they bounce -- and Google notices.
#### Robots.txt
Check: Does /robots.txt exist and is it properly configured?#### XML Sitemap
Check: Does /sitemap.xml exist?#### Canonical Tags
#### Page Speed Reference benchmarks:
| Metric | Good | Needs Work | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) | Under 2.5s | 2.5-4.0s | Over 4.0s |
| First Input Delay (FID) | Under 100ms | 100-300ms | Over 300ms |
| Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) | Under 0.1 | 0.1-0.25 | Over 0.25 |
| Time to First Byte (TTFB) | Under 200ms | 200-500ms | Over 500ms |
| First Contentful Paint (FCP) | Under 1.8s | 1.8-3.0s | Over 3.0s |
Common speed issues to flag:
#### Mobile-Friendliness
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">)Methodology for identifying content gaps:
Content Gap Template:
| Missing Topic | Search Volume Potential | Competition | Content Type Needed | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Topic] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | Blog/Guide/Tool/Page | 1-5 |
Identify opportunities to capture featured snippets:
Types of featured snippets:
Optimization checklist:
Check for structured data implementation:
| Schema Type | Applicable To | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Homepage, About page | Present/Missing |
| LocalBusiness | Local businesses | Present/Missing/N/A |
| Product | Product pages | Present/Missing/N/A |
| Article | Blog posts, news | Present/Missing/N/A |
| FAQ | FAQ sections | Present/Missing |
| HowTo | Tutorial content | Present/Missing/N/A |
| Review/AggregateRating | Reviews, testimonials | Present/Missing/N/A |
| BreadcrumbList | All pages with breadcrumbs | Present/Missing |
| WebSite/SearchAction | Homepage (sitelinks search box) | Present/Missing |
| Event | Event pages | Present/Missing/N/A |
Implementation guidance:
Identify specific internal linking improvements:
Linking Architecture Assessment:
Homepage
|-- Category/Service Pages (Pillar Content)
|-- Individual Blog Posts/Articles (Cluster Content)
|-- Back-links to Pillar Content
|-- Key Conversion Pages (Pricing, Signup, Contact)
|-- Linked from relevant contentEvaluate the revenue impact of Core Web Vitals performance:
Research-backed impacts:
Recommendations by metric:
| Metric | If Failing | Typical Fixes |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | Over 2.5s | Optimize hero image, preload critical resources, use CDN, reduce server response time |
| FID/INP | Over 100ms | Reduce JavaScript execution, defer non-critical scripts, use web workers |
| CLS | Over 0.1 | Set image dimensions, reserve space for ads/embeds, avoid inserting content above existing content |
Based on the audit findings, recommend:
Content Prioritization Matrix:
| Content Idea | Search Volume | Competition | Business Value | Priority Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Topic] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | 1-10 |
Scoring: High volume + Low competition + High business value = Highest priority
Generate a file called SEO-AUDIT.md with:
# SEO Content Audit
## [URL]
### Date: [Date]
---
## SEO Health Score: [X/100]
---
## On-Page SEO Checklist
### Title Tag
- Status: [Pass/Needs Work/Fail]
- Current: "[current title]"
- Recommended: "[improved title]"
- Issues: [list issues]
### Meta Description
- Status: [Pass/Needs Work/Fail]
- Current: "[current meta]"
- Recommended: "[improved meta]"
### Heading Hierarchy
[H1-H6 structure analysis]
### Image Optimization
[Alt text audit results]
### Internal Linking
[Link analysis]
### URL Structure
[URL assessment]
---
## Content Quality (E-E-A-T)
| Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Experience | [Strong/Present/Weak/Missing] | [details] |
| Expertise | [Strong/Present/Weak/Missing] | [details] |
| Authoritativeness | [Strong/Present/Weak/Missing] | [details] |
| Trustworthiness | [Strong/Present/Weak/Missing] | [details] |
---
## Keyword Analysis
- Primary Keyword: [keyword]
- Search Intent: [type]
- Keyword Placement: [checklist results]
- Secondary Keywords: [list]
---
## Technical SEO
[Quick check results]
---
## Content Gap Analysis
[Missing topics table]
---
## Featured Snippet Opportunities
[Specific opportunities]
---
## Schema Markup
[Current vs recommended]
---
## Internal Linking Opportunities
[Specific recommendations]
---
## Core Web Vitals
[Performance assessment with revenue impact]
---
## Content Strategy Recommendations
[Publishing plan, content priorities]
---
## Prioritized Recommendations
### Critical (Fix Immediately)
1. [recommendation with expected impact]
### High Priority (This Month)
1. [recommendation]
### Medium Priority (This Quarter)
1. [recommendation]
### Low Priority (When Resources Allow)
1. [recommendation]/market audit or /market landing previously, cross-reference those findings with the SEO audit for a more complete picture.Author: Kreative Minds / Khalid Mir Website: Kreative Minds | Khalid Mir © Kreative Minds. All rights reserved.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.