market-brand — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited market-brand (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Analyze a brand's voice, tone, and messaging across all available channels and generate a comprehensive brand voice guidelines document. This skill examines how a brand communicates, identifies patterns and inconsistencies, and produces actionable guidelines that any writer or marketer can follow to maintain brand consistency.
/market brand <url> or /market brandTo analyze a brand's voice, examine content from multiple sources. Prioritize in this order:
Primary Sources (must analyze):
Secondary Sources (analyze if available):
Tertiary Sources:
Use browser tools or the analyze_page.py script to access web content. For social media, check the website for social links and analyze the linked profiles.
Map the brand's voice along four primary dimensions. Each dimension is a spectrum, not a binary.
#### Dimension 1: Formal <-----> Casual Where does the brand fall on the formality spectrum?
| Signal | Formal | Casual |
|---|---|---|
| Contractions | Avoids them ("do not", "cannot") | Uses them freely ("don't", "can't") |
| Sentence structure | Complex, longer sentences | Short, punchy sentences |
| Vocabulary | Professional, industry-standard | Conversational, everyday words |
| Greetings | "Dear valued customer" | "Hey there!" |
| Pronouns | Third person ("the company", "one") | First/second person ("we", "you") |
| Humor | Rare or absent | Frequent, natural |
| Slang/colloquialisms | Never | Occasionally or frequently |
Score: 1 (extremely formal) to 10 (extremely casual)
Evidence required: Quote 3-5 specific examples from the source material that support your rating.
#### Dimension 2: Serious <-----> Playful How much levity does the brand inject into its communication?
| Signal | Serious | Playful |
|---|---|---|
| Tone | Authoritative, measured | Light-hearted, fun |
| Metaphors | Rare, conservative | Creative, unexpected |
| Exclamation marks | Rare | Frequent |
| Emoji use | Never | Sometimes or often |
| Wordplay/puns | Never | Enjoys them |
| Error messages | "An error has occurred" | "Oops! Something went sideways" |
| Self-deprecation | Never | Occasionally |
Score: 1 (extremely serious) to 10 (extremely playful)
#### Dimension 3: Technical <-----> Simple How much domain expertise does the brand assume in its audience?
| Signal | Technical | Simple |
|---|---|---|
| Jargon | Uses industry terms freely | Avoids or explains all jargon |
| Acronyms | Uses without definition | Spells out on first use |
| Detail level | In-depth explanations | High-level overviews |
| Audience assumption | Expert audience | General audience |
| Data/statistics | Frequent, detailed | Occasional, simplified |
| Examples | Complex, domain-specific | Simple, relatable analogies |
Score: 1 (extremely technical) to 10 (extremely simple)
#### Dimension 4: Reserved <-----> Bold How much personality and confidence does the brand project?
| Signal | Reserved | Bold |
|---|---|---|
| Claims | Hedged ("we believe", "may help") | Direct ("we guarantee", "the best") |
| Opinions | Neutral, balanced | Strong, opinionated |
| Competitive references | Avoids mentioning competitors | Directly compares |
| Personality | Professional, understated | Distinctive, memorable |
| Promises | Conservative | Ambitious |
| Controversy | Avoids | Embraces when aligned with values |
Score: 1 (extremely reserved) to 10 (extremely bold)
Beyond the four dimensions, map how the brand's tone shifts across different contexts:
| Context | Typical Tone | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Homepage | [Confident/Welcoming/Urgent/etc.] | "[quote from homepage]" |
| Product description | [Informative/Persuasive/Technical/etc.] | "[quote]" |
| Blog post | [Educational/Conversational/Authoritative/etc.] | "[quote]" |
| Social media | [Casual/Engaging/Promotional/etc.] | "[quote]" |
| Error/404 page | [Apologetic/Humorous/Helpful/etc.] | "[quote]" |
| Email subject lines | [Direct/Curious/Urgent/etc.] | "[quote]" |
| CTA buttons | [Action-oriented/Benefit-driven/Urgent/etc.] | "[quote]" |
| Customer support | [Empathetic/Professional/Friendly/etc.] | "[quote]" |
Map the brand to one of five core personality archetypes (brands may blend 1-2):
#### The 5 Archetypes
1. The Authority
2. The Innovator
3. The Friend
4. The Rebel
5. The Guide
Assessment:
Identify patterns in the brand's word choices:
#### Words They Use Frequently Analyze all source material and identify the 15-20 most characteristic words or phrases. Organize by category:
Action words: (verbs they favor)
Descriptive words: (adjectives they use)
Value words: (words that reflect their values)
Industry-specific terms:
#### Words They Avoid Identify words that are notably absent or that would feel out of character:
#### Signature Phrases Does the brand have any recurring phrases, taglines, or linguistic patterns?
Compare the brand's voice to 2-3 key competitors:
Voice Comparison Matrix:
| Dimension | [Brand] | Competitor 1 | Competitor 2 | Competitor 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formal <> Casual | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 |
| Serious <> Playful | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 |
| Technical <> Simple | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 |
| Reserved <> Bold | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 |
| Primary Archetype | [type] | [type] | [type] | [type] |
Differentiation Assessment:
Assess voice consistency across all analyzed channels:
| Channel | Voice Consistency | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Homepage | Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [specific observations] |
| About page | Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [notes] |
| Blog | Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [notes] |
| Social media | Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [notes] |
| Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [notes] | |
| Product pages | Consistent/Mostly/Inconsistent | [notes] |
Common Consistency Issues:
Overall Consistency Score: X/10
Document the brand's messaging from most distilled to most expanded:
#### Level 1: Tagline (under 10 words) The most compressed form of the brand message.
#### Level 2: Value Propositions (1 sentence each) 3-5 core value propositions that support the brand promise.
#### Level 3: Elevator Pitch (30 seconds / 75 words) A conversational explanation of what the brand does and why it matters. "[Draft elevator pitch based on analyzed content]"
#### Level 4: Boilerplate (100-150 words) The standard "about us" paragraph used in press releases, email signatures, and speaker bios. "[Draft boilerplate based on analyzed content]"
#### Level 5: Full Brand Story (300-500 words) The complete narrative of who the brand is, what they stand for, and why they exist.
Create the comprehensive Do's and Don'ts guide:
#### Voice Chart
OUR VOICE IS: OUR VOICE IS NOT:
--------------------------------------------------
[Characteristic 1] [Anti-characteristic 1]
e.g., "Confident" e.g., "Arrogant"
[Characteristic 2] [Anti-characteristic 2]
e.g., "Helpful" e.g., "Condescending"
[Characteristic 3] [Anti-characteristic 3]
e.g., "Clear" e.g., "Dumbed down"
[Characteristic 4] [Anti-characteristic 4]
e.g., "Bold" e.g., "Aggressive"#### Writing Do's and Don'ts
DO:
DON'T:
Provide 5-8 sample copy pieces written in the identified brand voice so the team has concrete examples to reference:
1. Homepage Headline: "[Sample headline in the brand voice]"
2. Product Description Paragraph: "[Sample product description in the brand voice]"
3. Blog Post Opening: "[Sample blog intro in the brand voice]"
4. Social Media Post: "[Sample social post in the brand voice]"
5. Email Subject Line: "[Sample subject line in the brand voice]"
6. CTA Button Text: "[Sample CTA text in the brand voice]"
7. Error Message: "[Sample error message in the brand voice]"
8. Customer Thank You Message: "[Sample thank you message in the brand voice]"
Generate a file called BRAND-VOICE.md with:
# Brand Voice Guidelines
## [Brand Name]
### Analysis Date: [Date]
---
## Voice Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of the brand voice, personality, and key characteristics]
---
## Voice Dimensions
### Formal <-----> Casual: [X/10]
[Evidence and explanation]
### Serious <-----> Playful: [X/10]
[Evidence and explanation]
### Technical <-----> Simple: [X/10]
[Evidence and explanation]
### Reserved <-----> Bold: [X/10]
[Evidence and explanation]
### Visual Voice MapFormal Casual |----[X]----------------------------------| Serious Playful |--------[X]------------------------------| Technical Simple |------------------[X]--------------------| Reserved Bold |------------[X]--------------------------|
---
## Brand Personality
- Primary Archetype: [Archetype]
- Secondary Archetype: [Archetype]
- [Explanation and evidence]
---
## Tone by Context
| Context | Tone | Example |
|---|---|---|
| [context] | [tone] | "[example]" |
---
## Vocabulary
### Words We Use
[Organized word lists]
### Words We Avoid
[Words that don't fit the brand]
### Signature Phrases
[Recurring patterns and phrases]
---
## Voice Chart
| Our Voice IS | Our Voice IS NOT |
|---|---|
| [trait] | [anti-trait] |
---
## Writing Guidelines
### Do's
- [specific guidelines]
### Don'ts
- [specific anti-patterns]
---
## Brand Messaging Hierarchy
### Tagline
[tagline]
### Value Propositions
1. [value prop]
### Elevator Pitch
[pitch]
### Boilerplate
[boilerplate]
---
## Copy Samples
[8 examples of copy in the brand voice]
---
## Competitor Voice Comparison
[Comparison matrix and differentiation analysis]
---
## Consistency Audit
[Channel-by-channel assessment]
- Overall Consistency Score: [X/10]
---
## Recommendations
### Immediate Actions
1. [recommendation]
### Voice Evolution Opportunities
1. [recommendation]
### Consistency Improvements
1. [recommendation]/market competitors previously, use that data for the competitor voice comparison section.Author: Kreative Minds / Khalid Mir Website: Kreative Minds | Khalid Mir © Kreative Minds. All rights reserved.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.