thoughtbox:research-002624 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited thoughtbox:research-002624 (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Research this topic using Thoughtbox IRCoT: $ARGUMENTS
thoughtbox://cipherthoughtbox://interleaved/researchCreate a Thoughtbox session and assess available tools.
// thoughtbox_execute
async () => {
await tb.thought({
thought: "Research question: $ARGUMENTS. Available search tools: [list from ToolSearch]. Strategy: breadth-first scan, then depth on promising leads.",
thoughtType: "context_snapshot",
nextThoughtNeeded: true,
thoughtNumber: 1,
totalThoughts: 30,
sessionTitle: "Research: $ARGUMENTS",
sessionTags: ["research"],
contextData: {
toolsAvailable: [],
constraints: ["primary sources preferred"]
}
});
}Steps:
context_snapshot: state the research question, available tools, constraints.Run this cycle until the question is answered or no productive search avenues remain.
Record a reasoning thought: what do I need to find out next? What gaps remain?
// thoughtbox_execute
async () => {
await tb.thought({
thought: "Gap: I know X but not Y. Next search: [specific query]. Rationale: [why this fills the gap].",
thoughtType: "reasoning",
nextThoughtNeeded: true,
thoughtNumber: N,
totalThoughts: 30
});
}Use the best available tool for the current sub-question:
tb.knowledge.searchEntities() for prior Thoughtbox findingsRecord findings as a reasoning thought with evidence references. Include source URLs or file paths.
// thoughtbox_execute
async () => {
await tb.thought({
thought: "Finding: [what was learned]. Source: [url/path]. Confidence: [high/medium/low]. Implication: [how this changes understanding].",
thoughtType: "reasoning",
nextThoughtNeeded: true,
thoughtNumber: N,
totalThoughts: 30
});
}Consolidate findings so far. Identify contradictions, gaps, and next priorities.
// thoughtbox_execute
async () => {
await tb.thought({
thought: "Synthesis at thought N: [summary of key findings]. Contradictions: [if any]. Remaining gaps: [list]. Priority for next cycle: [specific question].",
thoughtType: "synthesis",
nextThoughtNeeded: true,
thoughtNumber: N,
totalThoughts: 30
});
}Stop the IRCoT loop when ANY of these hold:
Bridge findings into the Thoughtbox knowledge graph for future retrieval.
For each key finding:
// thoughtbox_execute
async () => {
const entity = await tb.knowledge.createEntity({
name: "Finding: [concise label]",
entityType: "Insight",
observations: [
"[key claim]. Source: [url/path]. Confidence: [level]."
]
});
// Link related findings
await tb.knowledge.createRelation({
from: entity.id,
to: relatedEntityId,
relationType: "BUILDS_ON"
});
}Relation types to use:
BUILDS_ON — finding extends or deepens anotherCONTRADICTS — finding conflicts with anotherRELATES_TO — thematic connection without causal linkSUPPORTS — finding provides evidence for anotherAdd observations with source attribution to every entity.
Record a final thought closing the session.
// thoughtbox_execute
async () => {
await tb.thought({
thought: "Conclusion: [answer to original question]. Key evidence: [top 3 sources]. Confidence: [overall level]. Open questions: [if any].",
thoughtType: "conclusion",
nextThoughtNeeded: false,
thoughtNumber: N,
totalThoughts: N
});
}Present findings to the user as structured markdown:
If the session produced reusable insights, extract them.
// thoughtbox_execute
async () => {
const analysis = await tb.session.analyze();
if (analysis.insightDensity > 0.3) {
await tb.session.extractLearnings();
}
}~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.