code-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited code-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Perform comprehensive code reviews analyzing bugs, style issues, performance bottlenecks, security vulnerabilities, and adherence to best practices.
view tool to read all relevant files in the codebaseCheck for the following categories:
Bugs & Logic Errors:
Security Issues:
Performance Problems:
Code Style:
Best Practices:
Group issues by:
For each issue:
Structure the output as:
# Code Review Report
## Summary
- Total files reviewed: X
- Issues found: Y (Z critical, W high, V medium, U low)
## Critical Issues
[List critical issues with fixes]
## High Priority Issues
[List high priority issues with fixes]
## Medium Priority Issues
[List medium priority issues with fixes]
## Low Priority Issues
[List low priority issues with fixes]
## Strengths
[Mention good practices found in the code]
## Recommendations
[Overall suggestions for improvement]references/security_checklist.md when analyzing securityreferences/performance_patterns.md for performance optimizationreferences/language_guides/ for language-specific best practicesscripts/run_linter.sh <file> - Run automated lintingscripts/complexity_analysis.py <file> - Calculate cyclomatic complexityscripts/security_scan.py <dir> - Run security vulnerability scannerUser: "Review this authentication code"
Process:
view tool~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.