check-ci — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited check-ci (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Use this for PR health checks and failure triage.
pr-analysis: prefer check-ci when the main question is why checks are failing or blocked.gh pr view --json number.gh pr checks <pr> and save verbose output to scratch/check-ci-<pr>.log when needed.gh run view <run-id> --log-failed.gh pr view --json mergeable,mergeStateStatus plus local git fetch origin.bun run lint, bun run buildbun test or bun test <file>bash scripts/all_fast_validate_checks.sh(cd android && ./gradlew <task>)bash scripts/ios/swift-build.sh or bash scripts/ios/swift-test.sh~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.