krypton-planning — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited krypton-planning (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Krypton Planning turns a request into a goal package that names the outcome, truth owner, contract, cutover, and acceptance evidence before anyone writes code.
Do not treat a task list as a plan. A Krypton plan is ready only when it answers:
What outcome are we serving?
What current behavior is being replaced, redirected, deleted, or demoted?
Who owns the truth?
What contract crosses the boundary?
What is the smallest high-value slice?
What proves the result from the target person's perspective?
What kill criteria stop duplicate paths from living forever?If ownership, cutover, contract, or evidence is fuzzy, stop and map before planning.
Plan title:
Intent:
Current behavior:
Expected outcome:
Target-perspective output:
Truth owner:
Contract boundary:
Cutover:
Displaced path:
Value density:
Evidence gate:
Acceptance evidence:
Evidence lane:
Kill criteria:
Non-goals:
Risk if wrong:Files to create:
Files to modify:
Files to avoid:
Source of truth:
Read path:
Write path:
Contract boundary:
Integration points:
Migration/cutover:
Displaced path:
Acceptance evidence gate:For broad or unclear repositories, dispatch a read-only explorer if the harness supports agents. Ask one bounded question, such as "map the source of truth, read/write path, unsafe files, and evidence gate." The execution session should use this map instead of rediscovering the same slice.
docs/goals/<goal-slug>/PLAN.md
docs/goals/<goal-slug>/GOAL.md
docs/goals/<goal-slug>/EVIDENCE.mdPLAN.md contains the full plan. GOAL.md is a short execution prompt that points to the plan instead of copying it. EVIDENCE.md starts empty and is filled during execution with the real proof captured from the target perspective.
PLAN.md with this header shape:# [Outcome Title] Implementation Plan
**Intent:** ...
**Current Behavior:** ...
**Expected Outcome:** ...
**Target-Perspective Output:** ...
**Truth Owner:** ...
**Contract Boundary:** ...
**Cutover:** ...
**Displaced Path:** ...
**Value Density:** ...
**Evidence Gate:** ...
**Acceptance Evidence:** ...
**Evidence Lane:** ...
**Kill Criteria:** ...
**Architecture Slice:** ...
**Plan Review Gate:** Requires PRE review before execution.plan-reviewer-prompt.md as the individual prompt template. Do not execute until blocker findings are fixed or explicitly accepted by the user.Use this compact handoff. This is the /goal prompt or next-session prompt the operator should paste into Codex or Claude:
# Goal: [Outcome Title]
Use Krypton Execution to execute `docs/goals/<goal-slug>/PLAN.md`.
Core rules:
- Treat PLAN.md as the source plan.
- Preserve intent, ownership, contract, cutover, evidence, and kill criteria.
- Do not add a new dominant path without deleting, redirecting, demoting, or shimming the displaced path.
- Capture acceptance evidence from the target perspective and record it in EVIDENCE.md.
- Say "implemented but unproven" if that evidence cannot be captured.Create this file with the goal package and update it during execution:
# [Outcome Title] Evidence
## Acceptance Evidence
Record the real artifact that proves the outcome from the target perspective.
## Verification
Record the focused check that passed, including the command and relevant output.
## Review Notes
Record reviewer, maintainer, or verifier findings that changed the result.~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.