PrestaShop Component CONTEXT.md Generator

Purpose

Generate a lean, accurate CONTEXT.md for a PrestaShop shared component (src/Core/{Name}/ + src/Adapter/{Name}/) by exploring the real codebase.

Components are not business domains — they have no CQRS structure. They provide shared infrastructure consumed by many domains.

Output format

Principle: paths not inventories. Class names are greppable on demand. What earns tokens is:

• The layer table (where to look)
• Non-obvious patterns (things that would surprise a competent PHP developer)

# {Component Name} Component

> **Status:** Draft — this context file is a starting point and should be refined by domain experts.

## Purpose

{1–2 sentences: what this component provides and what it does NOT do}

## Layers

| Layer | Path |
|-------|------|
| {layer name} | {path} |

## Non-obvious patterns

- {bullet: surprising architectural decision, gotcha, or non-obvious constraint}

## Canonical examples

- {file path — 1-line role}

## Skills

- [`skill-name`](../../skills/skill-name/SKILL.md) — one-line description

## Related

- [{Component}]({path}) — {why related}

`## Skills` is optional — only include it if a skill in .ai/skills/ targets this component. Omit the section entirely if no relevant skill exists.

Do NOT include: ## Coding standards, ## Do, ## Don't, ## Testing expectations, ## Architecture overview with verbose subsections. These inflate token cost without adding value.

Target size: 20–35 lines.

Step-by-step process

1. Confirm the target is a Component, not a Domain

• Component → src/Core/{Name}/ with NO Command/, Query/, Handler/ subdirectories at root
• Domain → src/Core/Domain/{Name}/ — use domain-context-generator instead

2. Explore the codebase

Use the Explore agent (thoroughness: very thorough) to map:

• src/Core/{Name}/ — interfaces, abstract classes, key concrete classes
• src/Adapter/{Name}/ — concrete implementations, legacy bridges
• Grep for the component's main interface across src/Core/Domain/ and src/PrestaShopBundle/ — identify 2–3 representative consumers
• Note any sub-patterns with a non-obvious design decision

3. Fill the Layers table

One row per architectural layer actually found. Keep paths as specific as possible (file path for single-file layers, directory for multi-file layers).

4. Write Non-obvious patterns

Only include what would surprise a competent PHP developer:

• Coexisting design patterns (e.g. legacy vs modern)
• Constraints that break obvious assumptions (e.g. "stopPropagation() is blocked")
• Generated/cached artifacts that must be refreshed manually
• Performance or ordering gotchas
• Subtle API distinctions that cause bugs if missed

Skip anything derivable from reading the code for 5 minutes.

5. Write Canonical examples

Pick 2–3 files: the main interface, the most-used implementation, and one domain consumer.

6. Check for relevant skills

List the contents of .ai/skills/ and check if any skill targets this component. If one exists, include a ## Skills section before ## Related linking to it.

7. Write Related (use sparingly)

Links to other .ai/Component/ or .ai/Domain/ context files — but only when the relationship is non-obvious.

The whole point of splitting contexts into separate files is to avoid loading everything at once. Every cross-reference is a potential cascade: an AI agent reads component A, follows a link to component B, follows B's link to C... and ends up loading all contexts. This defeats the purpose of the split.

Include a link when:

• The relationship is architecturally surprising (e.g. PositionUpdater lives inside Grid's source tree)
• Two components coexist during a migration and the coexistence has gotchas (e.g. Twig ↔ Smarty)

Do NOT include a link when:

• The relationship is obvious from imports (e.g. "Controller dispatches CQRS commands")
• You're linking just to mention a hook name or a specific class — those are greppable
• The link points to a domain just because that domain is a heavy consumer of the component
• The link would create a bidirectional reference (A → B and B → A)

When in doubt, omit the link. An agent can always find related contexts via the index in .ai/CONTEXT.md.

Reference: lean Grid component example

# Grid Component

> **Status:** Draft — this context file is a starting point and should be refined by domain experts.

## Purpose

Infrastructure for rendering and managing back-office data tables: column definitions, filters, row/bulk actions, query builders, data factories, and drag-and-drop position reordering. Does not contain any business data — each domain provides its own `GridDefinitionFactory` and Doctrine query builder.

## Layers

| Layer | Path |
|-------|------|
| Core contracts + factory | `src/Core/Grid/` |
| Column types, row/bulk actions | `src/Core/Grid/Column/`, `src/Core/Grid/Action/` |
| Query builder base | `src/Core/Grid/Query/AbstractDoctrineQueryBuilder.php` |
| Position updater | `src/Core/Grid/Position/` |
| Adapter utilities | `src/Adapter/Grid/` |

## Non-obvious patterns

- `AbstractGridDefinitionFactory` dispatches `action{GridId}GridDefinitionModifier` hook — modules add columns/actions without touching core code
- `SearchCriteriaInterface` is stored as a Symfony request attribute per grid, not a service — each grid type has its own `{Domain}Filters` class
- 60+ concrete query builders exist (one per domain grid) — all extend `AbstractDoctrineQueryBuilder` and implement `getSearchQueryBuilder()` + `getCountQueryBuilder()`

## Canonical examples

- `src/Core/Grid/Definition/Factory/AbstractGridDefinitionFactory.php`
- `src/Core/Grid/Definition/Factory/ProductGridDefinitionFactory.php`
- `src/Core/Grid/Query/AbstractDoctrineQueryBuilder.php`

## Related

- [PositionUpdater Component](../PositionUpdater/CONTEXT.md) — drag-and-drop reordering sub-layer (lives inside Grid source tree)

Output

Write the completed CONTEXT.md to:

.ai/Component/{Name}/CONTEXT.md

If the directory does not exist, create it first. After writing, confirm the file path to the user.