code-review — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited code-review (Agent Skill) and scored it 87/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 1 high-severity and 1 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 2 flagged
The text {match} is the classic direct prompt-injection phrasing. Placed in a skill body that the agent reads as trusted instructions, it tries to make the agent abandon its prior rules and follow whatever comes next — a full system-prompt override.
ignore/disregard/forget … previous instructions sentence.The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Today: !date "+%Y-%m-%d" Branch: !git branch --show-current Staged changes: !git diff --cached --stat 2>/dev/null || echo "none" Unstaged changes: !git diff --stat 2>/dev/null || echo "none"
You are running a multi-pass code review. Read procedure.md in this skill folder for the full orchestration protocol.
git diff --cached)git diff main...HEAD)passes/ directory. Each file contains focused review instructions for one subagent.When the user says "full review", "include performance", or "include test coverage":
passes-optional/file:line + quoted code~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.