# name: stable local skill identifier; must match the parent directory name.
name: positioning
# description: routing contract; names when to activate and when not to activate.
description: "Use when applying April Dunford-style product positioning to make a product's differentiated value obvious to the right buyers: competitive alternatives, unique attributes, value themes, best-fit target segments, market category, trend context, and reusable positioning output. Covers the Obviously Awesome 10-step workflow, positioning canvas logic, category choice, value-to-segment fit, and positioning-to-sales-message translation. Do NOT use for full strategy-cascade formulation (use playing-to-win), market-creating value innovation (use blue-ocean-strategy), industry-structure diagnosis (use porters-five-forces), or durable moat classification (use seven-powers)."
# license: license for this skill content.
license: MIT
# compatibility: runtime and file-format notes for external skill consumers.
compatibility:
notes: "Markdown, positioning memos, product strategy, B2B SaaS go-to-market, sales narrative"
# allowed-tools: tool allowlist the skill expects when loaded by agent runtimes.
allowed-tools: Read Grep
# metadata: Skill Metadata Protocol fields consumed by Skill Graph tooling.
metadata:
# schema_version: protocol contract version this skill conforms to.
# Integer 8. Prior contract retrievable via `git show schema-v7:schemas/skill.schema.json`.
# version: skill content version. Bump when instructional content changes.
# subject: primary browse shelf. One of nine values: code-engineering / quality-assurance /
# frontend-ui / design-craft / agent-ops / product-domain / knowledge-organization /
# meta-methods / data-analytics.
subject: reasoning-strategy
# public: publishability / private-data gate. true = safe for public release; false = private/internal.
# Project anchoring lives in project[] and requires grounding when present.
# scope: PRD-style free-text statement of what the skill teaches and excludes.
scope: "April Dunford product-positioning methodology for choosing the market context that makes a product's differentiated value obvious to best-fit buyers. Includes competitive alternatives, unique attributes, value themes, target segmentation, market category, optional trend context, positioning capture, and sales-message translation. Excludes integrated company strategy, industry-structure analysis, value-innovation market creation, durable moat diagnosis, and finished copywriting."
# public: publishability / private-data gate. true = safe for public release; false = private/internal.
public: true
# taxonomy_domain: optional slash-delimited sub-path within the subject.
taxonomy_domain: foundations/strategy
# owner: maintainer responsible for keeping this skill current.
# freshness: ISO date the skill body was last reviewed or updated.
# drift_check: truth-source verification record with last_verified and optional hashes.
# eval_artifacts: disk-truth for eval files. none / planned / present.
# eval_state: runtime-truth for eval execution. unverified / passing / monitored.
# routing_eval: whether routing examples have passed a routing eval. absent / present.
# stability: lifecycle posture. experimental / stable / frozen / deprecated.
stability: stable
# keywords: fuzzy activation phrases. Keep at most 10.
keywords:
- positioning
- product positioning
- April Dunford
- Obviously Awesome
- competitive alternatives
- market category
- value themes
- best-fit customers
- positioning canvas
- sales narrative
# examples: realistic prompts that should activate this skill.
examples:
- "Apply April Dunford's positioning method to this product."
- "Our buyers keep comparing us to spreadsheets; rebuild our positioning around real alternatives."
- "Choose a market category that makes our differentiated value obvious."
- "Turn these features into value themes and identify who cares most."
- "Pressure-test this positioning statement before we update the sales deck."
# anti_examples: near-miss prompts that should route elsewhere.
anti_examples:
- "Turn this whole company plan into winning aspiration, where to play, how to win, capabilities, and systems."
- "Create a blue ocean strategy canvas and ERRC grid for this market."
- "Analyze rivalry, buyer power, supplier power, entrants, and substitutes."
- "Classify whether this company has network effects, scale economies, or counter-positioning."
- "Write final website hero copy and button microcopy from an approved position."
# relations: typed graph edges to sibling skills.
relations:
suppresses:
- skill: playing-to-win
reason: "positioning owns the product-market frame that makes differentiated value obvious; playing-to-win owns integrated company or product strategy choices across aspiration, arena, advantage, capabilities, and systems"
- skill: blue-ocean-strategy
reason: "positioning owns context-setting for an existing product's value; blue-ocean-strategy owns market-boundary reconstruction and value innovation when the task is to create new demand"
- skill: porters-five-forces
reason: "positioning owns buyer-facing market context and alternatives; porters-five-forces owns industry-structure and profit-pressure diagnosis"
- skill: seven-powers
reason: "positioning owns differentiated value communication and category framing; seven-powers owns durable firm-level power and moat-source classification"
- skill: microcopy
reason: "positioning owns the strategic source of truth before copy is written; microcopy owns finished interface and message wording after the position is chosen"
related:
- framework-fit-analysis
- user-research
- journey-mapping
- content-monitor
- constraint-awareness
verify_with:
- epistemic-grounding
- user-research
- methodology
# grounding: truth sources and failure modes for this skill.
grounding:
subject_matter: "April Dunford product positioning and the Obviously Awesome positioning process"
grounding_mode: universal
truth_sources:
- https://www.aprildunford.com/post/a-quickstart-guide-to-positioning
- https://www.aprildunford.com/books
- https://public.summaries.com/files/1-page-summary/obviously-awesome.pdf
- skills/reasoning-strategy/positioning/references/positioning-sources.md
- skills/reasoning-strategy/positioning/references/upstream-displacement-2026-05-29.md
failure_modes:
- internal_competitor_list_not_customer_alternatives
- differentiation_without_customer_value
- broad_category_hides_advantage
- new_category_theater_without_buyer_context
- target_segment_selected_before_value_fit
- trend_layer_used_as_hype
- positioning_statement_without_operational_capture
evidence_priority: general_knowledge_first
# portability: export readiness for external skill runtimes.
# lifecycle: maintenance policy for drift checks.
# comprehension_state: marker that five flat Understanding fields are populated.
# mental_model: primitives and relationships in one paragraph.
mental_model: "Product positioning is market-context design. The primitives are the customer's real competitive alternatives, the product's unique attributes, the value those attributes enable, the customer segments that care intensely about that value, the market category that makes the value obvious, optional trends that explain why now, and the captured position that aligns go-to-market teams. The method works in sequence because each later choice depends on the customer-relative evidence created by the earlier one."
# purpose: problem this skill solves.
purpose: "This skill prevents agents from treating positioning as a slogan, tagline, persona exercise, or generic differentiation list. It forces the answer to start with what customers would otherwise use, then map product attributes to value, value to best-fit customers, and customer value to a category frame that makes the product easy to understand and buy."
# boundary: what this concept is not.
concept_boundary: "Positioning chooses the market context for communicating a product's differentiated value. It is not an integrated strategy cascade, Blue Ocean value-innovation design, Five Forces industry analysis, Seven Powers moat diagnosis, segmentation-only STP marketing, final copywriting, brand identity, or OKR execution tracking. Those tools can feed or consume the position, but they do not replace the competitive-alternatives-first mechanism."
# analogy: one-sentence metaphor preserving the mechanism.
analogy: "Positioning is like placing a product on the right shelf in a store so buyers instantly know what to compare it with, why it is different, and whether it is for them."
# misconception: common wrong mental model and correction.
misconception: "The common mistake is thinking positioning starts with how the company wants to describe itself. Dunford-style positioning starts with the customer's real alternatives and works outward to attributes, value, best-fit buyers, category, and proof."
# structural_verdict: form/export shape. PASS / PASS_WITH_FIXES / FAIL / UNVERIFIED.
# truth_verdict: truth sources vs declared hashes. PASS / DRIFT / BROKEN / UNVERIFIED.
# comprehension_verdict: concept comprehension gate. PASS / SHALLOW / REDUNDANT /
# UNVERIFIED / PROVISIONAL / SKIPPED_BASELINE_HIGH / NA.
# application_verdict: behavior gate. APPLICABLE / REDUNDANT / HARMFUL / MIXED /
# FALSE_POSITIVE / PROVISIONAL / UNVERIFIED.
# last_changed: ISO date the skill body or frontmatter was last edited.
# last_audited: ISO date this skill was last audited.
# lint_verdict: result of the latest schema lint pass. PASS / FAIL / UNKNOWN.
# drift_status: drift sentinel result. OK / DRIFT / BROKEN / STALE / NO_BASELINE /
# EXTERNAL_UNHASHED / UNKNOWN.
relations:
related: ["framework-fit-analysis","journey-mapping","content-monitor","constraint-awareness","user-research","microcopy"]
suppresses: ["playing-to-win","porters-five-forces","seven-powers","blue-ocean-strategy"]
verify_with: ["user-research","epistemic-grounding","methodology"]
Concept of the skill
What it is: Positioning is April Dunford's method for choosing the market context that makes a product's differentiated value obvious to the customers most likely to care.
Mental model: Start with what customers would use if the product disappeared. From those alternatives, isolate what the product uniquely has, translate those attributes into customer value, identify who cares intensely, choose the category frame that makes the value understandable, add a trend only if it clarifies urgency, then capture the position for go-to-market teams.
Why it exists: Agents often produce positioning as a catchy statement, broad persona, feature list, or generic category claim. This skill forces the harder sequence: customer-relative alternatives first, value mapping second, target/customer and category choices after evidence exists.
What it is NOT: It is not company strategy, blue-ocean market creation, industry attractiveness analysis, moat classification, segmentation-only marketing, brand identity, final copywriting, or an OKR system.
Adjacent concepts: competitive alternatives, differentiated attributes, value themes, best-fit customers, market category, trend context, sales narrative, product marketing, segmentation, go-to-market alignment.
One-line analogy: Positioning puts the product on the shelf where the right buyers understand what it is, what to compare it with, and why it matters.
Common misconception: Positioning is not how the company wants to describe itself; it is the context that helps customers understand why this product is uniquely valuable for their situation.
Positioning
Coverage
This skill teaches agents to:
- Separate positioning from messaging, brand, category hype, and strategic planning.
- Start from customers' real competitive alternatives, including status quo and manual workarounds.
- Identify unique attributes only after the alternatives are clear.
- Translate attributes into value themes that matter to buyers.
- Determine which customer segments care most about those value themes.
- Choose a market category that makes the value obvious and sets useful buyer expectations.
- Add trend context only when it strengthens urgency and does not distort the position.
- Capture the position so sales, marketing, product, and customer success can reuse it consistently.
Philosophy of the skill
Positioning is useful because buyers understand new products by comparison. A product can be excellent and still fail if it is framed against the wrong alternatives, aimed at customers who do not care about its strongest value, or placed in a category that hides its advantage.
The method should make an agent less impressed by clever wording and more disciplined about context. The goal is not a prettier positioning statement. The goal is a sharper causal chain from customer alternatives to differentiated attributes to value to best-fit buyers to market category to reusable go-to-market proof.
Workflow
1. Define the positioning situation
Start by naming the product and the buying context.
Product:
Buyer or user:
Buying trigger:
Current category assumption:
Current positioning claim:
Observed confusion:
Decision this positioning must support:
If the request asks for final copy before the position is clear, produce the position first and label any copy as downstream draft language.
2. Identify true competitive alternatives
List what the customer would actually do without the product.
| Alternative | Evidence buyers use it | Strength for buyer | Weakness or frustration | Notes |
|---|
| Status quo | | | | |
| Manual workaround | | | | |
| Direct competitor | | | | |
| Adjacent tool or service | | | | |
| Internal build | | | | |
Do not limit alternatives to companies the vendor fears. Include spreadsheets, meetings, agencies, internal scripts, doing nothing, or a hacked-together stack when those are the real substitutes.
3. List unique attributes relative to those alternatives
Attributes are features, capabilities, assets, data, processes, integrations, expertise, or delivery advantages the product has and alternatives lack.
| Unique attribute | Alternative it beats | Proof | Risk if buyer does not care |
|---|
| | | |
Reject adjectives without evidence. "AI-powered", "easy", "modern", "premium", and "integrated" are weak unless tied to a concrete attribute the alternative lacks.
4. Map attributes to value themes
Convert each attribute into customer value.
| Attribute | Functional value | Economic value | Emotional or risk value | Evidence |
|---|
| | | | |
Use value language buyers can recognize: saves time, reduces risk, prevents rework, increases conversion, enables compliance, improves confidence, shortens onboarding, reduces dependency, preserves margin, or removes coordination cost.
If an attribute creates no buyer value, remove it from the positioning core.
5. Find who cares most
Do not choose the target segment before the value is clear. Choose the customers for whom the value is urgent, expensive, frequent, visible, or politically important.
| Segment | Pain intensity | Value fit | Buying trigger | Proof available | Positioning fit |
|---|
| high / medium / low | high / medium / low | | | |
Strong positioning often narrows the target. A broad target is acceptable only when multiple segments share the same high-intensity value driver.
6. Choose the market category
The category sets expectations before the buyer hears the details.
| Candidate category | Useful assumptions it creates | Bad assumptions it creates | Comparison set | Pricing expectation | Verdict |
|---|
| Existing category | | | | | |
| Narrow subcategory | | | | | |
| Adjacent category | | | | | |
| New category | | | | | |
Prefer the category that makes the differentiated value easiest to understand. A new category is a high-cost choice; use it only when existing frames consistently mislead buyers or hide the product's value.
7. Add trend context only if it helps
A trend can explain why the value matters now, but it cannot rescue weak positioning.
Good trend context:
- links to a buyer problem that is already changing,
- strengthens urgency,
- makes the category more credible,
- does not turn the product into a generic trend-chaser.
Weak trend context:
- starts with hype before buyer alternatives are clear,
- makes every competitor sound similar,
- overpromises inevitability,
- distracts from concrete value.
8. Capture the position
Use this as the reusable source of truth.
For: [best-fit customers]
Who currently: [competitive alternatives or status quo]
Our product is a: [market category]
That delivers: [primary value themes]
Because unlike: [alternatives]
We have: [unique attributes and proof]
Now matters because: [optional trend or buying trigger]
This is not final public copy. It is an internal positioning decision that should inform sales narrative, website structure, demo flow, proof points, onboarding, pricing comparison, and roadmap focus.
9. Translate into go-to-market implications
Positioning should change the work downstream.
| Surface | What the position should change |
|---|
| Sales discovery | Ask about alternatives, triggers, and value intensity |
| Sales deck | Lead with category and value before feature detail |
| Website | Make the comparison set and value obvious above the fold |
| Demo | Show proof of unique attributes tied to value |
| Product roadmap | Prioritize features that reinforce the chosen value themes |
| Customer success | Onboard toward the value promised by the position |
10. Pressure-test the position
Run these checks before presenting the position as usable.
| Check | Failure signal | Repair |
|---|
| Alternative realism | Alternatives are just direct competitors from the vendor's point of view | Interview buyers or inspect deals to identify real substitutes |
| Attribute uniqueness | The claimed differentiators are table stakes | Compare against alternatives feature by feature |
| Value clarity | Attributes do not translate into buyer outcomes | Rewrite as value themes or remove them |
| Segment intensity | Target customers care only mildly | Narrow to buyers with urgent, costly pain |
| Category fit | The category hides the advantage or sets wrong expectations | Test adjacent categories and subcategories |
| Trend discipline | Trend language is hype or broad inevitability | Remove it or tie it to a concrete buying trigger |
| Operational reuse | Sales, marketing, and product cannot use the output | Capture decisions in a shared positioning canvas |
Output Template
## Positioning Recommendation
### Competitive Alternatives
- [Alternative]: [why customers choose it today]
### Unique Attributes
- [Attribute]: [proof and alternative it beats]
### Value Themes
- [Theme]: [buyer outcome and evidence]
### Best-Fit Customers
- [Segment]: [why value intensity is high]
### Market Category
- Recommended category:
- Why this frame helps:
- Category risks:
### Trend Context
- Use / do not use:
- Reason:
### Captured Position
For [customers] who [current alternative/problem], [product] is a [category] that [value]. Unlike [alternatives], it [unique attributes/proof].
### Next Evidence Needed
- [Evidence that would strengthen or falsify the position]
Anti-Patterns
- Starting with a tagline, hero headline, or brand promise before competitive alternatives are clear.
- Treating all competitors as direct competitors while ignoring spreadsheets, agencies, manual work, or doing nothing.
- Naming features as differentiators without proving why buyers value them.
- Picking a target segment because it is large, not because it cares most.
- Choosing a broad market category because it sounds prestigious.
- Creating a new category to avoid competition rather than to clarify value.
- Adding trend language that makes the product sound generic.
- Treating the captured position as permanent instead of evidence-sensitive.
Boundaries
| Need | Use | Why |
|---|
| Choose the product-market frame and category context | positioning | Owns competitive alternatives, value themes, target fit, and category framing |
| Build a full strategic choice cascade | playing-to-win | Owns aspiration, where to play, how to win, capabilities, and systems |
| Create new demand through value innovation | blue-ocean-strategy | Owns strategy canvas, ERRC grid, noncustomers, and new value curves |
| Diagnose industry profit pressure | porters-five-forces | Owns rivalry, buyer/supplier power, entrants, and substitutes |
| Classify durable moat source | seven-powers | Owns benefit plus barrier mechanisms |
| Write final interface or marketing copy | microcopy or writing skills | Positioning supplies source truth; copy skills craft wording |
Verification
- [ ] Competitive alternatives are buyer-real, not company-internal.
- [ ] Unique attributes are concrete and compared against alternatives.
- [ ] Each core attribute maps to a buyer-recognizable value theme.
- [ ] Target segments are chosen because they care most about the value.
- [ ] The market category makes the product easier to understand and buy.
- [ ] New-category creation is justified only if existing categories mislead.
- [ ] Trend context is optional and tied to urgency, not hype.
- [ ] The captured position is reusable by sales, marketing, product, and customer success.
- [ ] The response does not present positioning as a tagline, brand exercise, full strategy cascade, Blue Ocean analysis, Five Forces analysis, or moat claim.
Do NOT Use When
Use another skill when the task falls outside the declared scope, matches an anti_examples prompt, or is owned by a more specific related skill.