Middleware Patterns

Next.js 16 rename. The root request-preprocessing file is now `proxy.ts` (exported function `proxy`). The middleware.ts/middleware convention is deprecated — it still works (a build warning, no error) and is retained specifically for Edge Runtime use cases, but Vercel's recommended path is proxy.ts. This skill uses "proxy/middleware" for the shared concept and names the file explicitly when the distinction matters. If you are on Next.js 15 or earlier, everything here applies under the middleware.ts name. See § The File Contract and § Migrating middleware.ts → proxy.ts.

Concept of the skill

The Next.js request-preprocessing layer is a single async function exported from one root file that runs before route resolution for every request matching its matcher config — proxy.ts (function proxy, Node.js runtime) since Next.js 16, or the deprecated-but-retained middleware.ts (function middleware, Edge Runtime by default) on older versions and Edge-only use cases. It receives a NextRequest and returns a NextResponse in one of four shapes: pass through (next, optionally with modified headers/cookies), rewrite (serve different content under the same URL), redirect (send a 30x and change the URL bar), or a direct response (short-circuit with a body and status). Because it is the only place a request can be intercepted before the framework knows which route it will hit, it is the right home for genuinely cross-cutting concerns — auth UX gates, locale routing, A/B rewrites, per-request CSP nonces, request-ID correlation, bot blocking, geo-routing — applied across many routes through one matcher instead of duplicated per route. Three facts make or break correct use: the runtime is load-bearing (proxy on Node.js has full APIs but the per-matched-request performance budget still forbids per-request I/O; middleware.ts on Edge has a hard capability ceiling and a bundle limit), the matcher is not a security perimeter (and /_next/data runs even when excluded while a matcher exclusion silently skips Server Functions on that path), and — most importantly — this layer is not an authorization boundary (CVE-2025-29927 let attackers bypass it entirely, and a cluster of May-2026 transport-variant bypasses reinforced that authz must live in the route, the Server Action, and the Data Access Layer, with the proxy auth check being only a fast UX redirect). The Next.js 16 rename from middleware to proxy itself encodes the discipline: keep this layer small, fast, cross-cutting, and never the sole gate — and reach for native next.config redirects/headers, the platform WAF, and route-level auth first.

Coverage

The discipline of designing the Next.js request-preprocessing layer: the one-file-per-project contract (proxy.ts since Next.js 16, or the deprecated middleware.ts, at the root or under src/, single function export), the runtime split (proxy runs on Node.js and its runtime config throws; middleware.ts runs on Edge with the Edge capability ceiling) and what each runtime can and cannot do, the matcher config that filters which paths trigger the layer (including the _next/data-always-runs and Server-Function-coverage gotchas), the NextRequest / NextResponse API surface (cookies, headers, and geolocation()/ipAddress() from @vercel/functions since request.geo/request.ip were removed in Next.js 15), the four response shapes (next, rewrite, redirect, direct response), waitUntil for background work, the official next/experimental/testing/server test utilities, the canonical pattern library (authentication UX gate, locale routing, A/B testing, security header injection, geo-routing, bot blocking, request-id correlation), the performance discipline that every matched request pays the cost, the CVE-2025-29927 lesson that this layer is not a security boundary, and the central design rule: it is for cross-cutting concerns that apply across many routes — never for per-route business logic.

Philosophy of the skill

The Pages Router's request lifecycle was: server hits getServerSideProps, which returns props, which render the page. The App Router added more layers (Server Components, Server Actions, Route Handlers), but kept one thing constant — they all run after the route is resolved.

The proxy/middleware layer runs before. It is the only layer where you can intercept a request without knowing which route it will eventually hit. That makes it the right home for concerns that apply across the entire app or large subsets of it: "every request needs a request-id header", "every request to /admin/* needs a role check", "every page needs a CSP nonce".

Next.js 16's rename from middleware to proxy encodes a deliberate stance. The team renamed it because "middleware" invited Express-style "do all my server logic here" misuse, and because the feature behaves as a network proxy in front of the app. Vercel now frames it as a feature to "use as a last resort" — reach first for native next.config redirects/headers, route-level auth, and the Data Access Layer. The architectural trade is breadth for power. The layer:

• Runs on a single runtime per file — proxy on Node.js (full Node APIs, but cross-cutting perf still forbids per-request I/O), middleware.ts on Edge (limited APIs, no Node-specific dependencies, no large packages).
• Runs on every matched request — performance ceiling matters because the cost multiplies.
• Has no per-route knowledge until the rewrite/redirect resolves — cannot read route-specific params.
• Cannot read the response body — it sits in front of the response, not over it.
• Is not a security boundary — it can be bypassed (CVE-2025-29927) and silently skipped by matcher exclusions; authorization must be enforced at the route.

In exchange, it can shape the entire request/response edge in a single place. Done well, it removes ceremony from every route; done badly, it adds latency to every request, concentrates business logic in a hard-to-test file, and gets mistaken for an access-control gate it cannot be.

The discipline is to keep it small, fast, cross-cutting, and never the sole authorization gate. When a piece of logic only applies to one route, it does not belong here. When it requires a per-request database lookup that adds 50ms, it does not belong here. When it is the only thing standing between an attacker and /admin, it is not enough.

Prefer Native Features First — Proxy Is a Last Resort

Vercel's own guidance frames this layer as the feature to reach for last. Before writing per-request code that runs on every matched request, check whether a simpler, cheaper, statically-evaluated upstream feature already does the job:

next.config redirects and headers run before proxy in the routing chain and cost no per-request execution. The full execution order is: next.config headers → next.config redirects → proxy → beforeFiles rewrites → filesystem routes (public/, _next/static/, pages/, app/) → afterFiles rewrites → dynamic routes → fallback rewrites. Every concern you can push to a static upstream feature is latency you do not pay on every request — and a smaller, faster proxy is a better proxy. Proxy is the right tool when the app must decide at the HTTP edge using request facts before the route is resolved; it is not a general-purpose "before hook" and should not become a hidden second router.

The File Contract

// proxy.ts (Next.js 16+, project root or src/) — Node.js runtime
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
import type { NextRequest } from 'next/server'

export function proxy(request: NextRequest) {       // mark async if you await inside
  // ... transform or gate the request ...
  return NextResponse.next()
}

export const config = {
  matcher: ['/((?!api|_next/static|_next/image|favicon.ico).*)'],
}

// middleware.ts (Next.js ≤15, or Next.js 16 when you NEED the Edge Runtime) — DEPRECATED in 16
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
import type { NextRequest } from 'next/server'

export async function middleware(request: NextRequest) {
  return NextResponse.next()
}

export const config = {
  matcher: ['/((?!api|_next/static|_next/image|favicon.ico).*)'],
}

• One file per project. There is no chain of files. Compose multiple concerns inside a single proxy/middleware function, with helpers imported from small modules.
• Single export. Default export or a named proxy (or middleware) export both work; pick one. Multiple proxies from the same file are not supported.
• Never ship both files. If proxy.ts and middleware.ts coexist, behavior is unstable — delete middleware.ts once proxy.ts exists.
• Use the codemod for Next.js 16 migrations. npx @next/codemod@canary middleware-to-proxy . renames the file and the exported function (see § Migrating middleware.ts → proxy.ts).
• `config.matcher` filters which paths trigger the layer. Critical: the default — no matcher — runs on every single request including static assets. Always set a matcher.
• `NextProxy` type (Next.js 16) infers both the request (NextRequest) and event (NextFetchEvent) parameters: export const proxy: NextProxy = (request, event) => { … }.

Runtime: the load-bearing distinction

The runtime is what decides whether the old "no Node APIs, no DB, hand-roll everything" advice applies. On Edge (middleware.ts) it is a hard capability wall. On Node (proxy.ts) those APIs exist — but the performance discipline still forbids per-request database calls, because the cost multiplies across every matched request. The constraint moved from "you can't" to "you mustn't." Do not turn the Node.js runtime into permission to do expensive work: a database query, remote JWKS fetch, or SDK initialization in proxy still adds cost to every matched request and can become a global latency tax.

Matcher syntax

export const config = {
  matcher: [
    '/dashboard/:path*',                                          // glob
    '/((?!api|_next/static|_next/image|favicon.ico|sitemap.xml|robots.txt).*)', // negative lookahead
    {
      source: '/api/admin/:path*',
      has: [{ type: 'header', key: 'Authorization' }],
      missing: [{ type: 'cookie', key: 'session' }],             // skip when cookie absent
    },
    {
      source: '/((?!api|_next/static|_next/image|favicon.ico).*)',
      missing: [                                                 // skip speculative prefetches
        { type: 'header', key: 'next-router-prefetch' },
        { type: 'header', key: 'purpose', value: 'prefetch' },
      ],
    },
  ],
}

Matchers compile to regular expressions at build time. They cannot use runtime values — every source must be a build-time constant, must start with /, may use named parameters (:path*), and may add has / missing conditions to match on headers, cookies, or query params. Complex negative lookaheads are common because the default-matches-everything behavior is rarely what you want — image fetches, static assets, prefetch requests, and webhook routes should usually be excluded. The baseline exclusion list usually covers api routes (unless this layer is intentionally protecting a whole API subtree), /_next/static and /_next/image, static metadata files such as favicon.ico / sitemap.xml / robots.txt, webhook paths that need exact raw-body/signature handling in their Route Handler, and prefetch requests when the concern need not run for speculative navigation.

Three gotchas the docs call out explicitly:

• The biggest footgun is forgetting to exclude /_next/static and /_next/image, which makes every image fetch run the layer on the hot path.
• `/_next/data` still runs even when you exclude it in a negative matcher — this is intentional, so that protecting a page also protects its corresponding data route. Don't assume your negative lookahead removed data-route coverage; test matcher coverage instead of fighting the behavior.
• Server Functions follow the matcher. Server Actions are handled as POST requests to the route where they're used, so a matcher that excludes a path also skips the Server Function calls on that path. A matcher change or a refactor that moves a Server Function can silently remove proxy coverage — which is one more reason auth must live inside the action (see § The Auth Reality).
• *Excluding prefetch requests is for non-auth concerns only. The `missing` block above skips speculative `next-router-prefetch` / `purpose: prefetch` requests so header-injection or logging work doesn't run twice — a performance optimization. Do not use it to skip an auth gate: transport-specific route variants (`.rsc`, segment-prefetch) can resolve to the same page, and excluding them is exactly the class of gap that produced CVE-2026-44575 (App Router middleware/proxy bypass via segment-prefetch routes — see [§ The Auth Reality](#the-auth-reality-cve-2025-29927)). For auth, stay on a patched Next.js (which now includes transport variants when generating matchers) and* enforce authorization at the route regardless.

The Four Response Shapes

import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'

// 1. Pass through — let the request continue to its route
return NextResponse.next()

// 2. Rewrite — internally route to a different path; URL bar unchanged
return NextResponse.rewrite(new URL('/en/about', request.url))

// 3. Redirect — send a 30x to the browser; URL bar changes
return NextResponse.redirect(new URL('/login', request.url))

// 4. Direct response — short-circuit; return a response without hitting any route
return new NextResponse('Forbidden', { status: 403 })
// (Response.json(...) and Response.redirect(...) also work for direct responses)

Choose based on what the user should see and what should change:

Rewrite vs redirect is a load-bearing distinction: rewrites are invisible to the user (the URL stays the same), redirects are visible (the URL changes and the browser does a second request). If you want the user to see they've been moved (/old-path → /new-path), redirect. If you want to keep their URL and serve different content (A/B variant, internal locale path), rewrite.

Always rewrite with `NextResponse.rewrite()`, not a hand-rolled `fetch()`. For App Router rewrites, Next.js propagates internal RSC/Flight headers (the request carries an RSC marker; the response needs the matching vary handling) so a rewritten route still serves the correct React Server Component payload to a client-side navigation. A custom fetch() that re-implements the rewrite can drop or mishandle those headers — the page works on a hard load but breaks (or serves the wrong/stale RSC payload) on soft client-side navigation. Let NextResponse.rewrite() own the transport; only set the headers you own on top of it.

Before reaching for a redirect/rewrite here, check `next.config`. Static redirects and headers in next.config.js run before proxy in the routing chain and need no per-request code. Use proxy only when the decision is dynamic (depends on a cookie, header, geo, or A/B bucket). The full execution order is: next.config headers → next.config redirects → proxy → beforeFiles rewrites → filesystem routes → afterFiles rewrites → dynamic routes → fallback rewrites.

Header and Cookie Discipline

NextResponse.next({ request: { headers } }) changes the request seen by the route/rendering layer; response.headers.set(...) changes the response seen by the browser. These are two different surfaces — set both only when both consumers need the value (e.g. a CSP nonce the renderer reads and the browser enforces). The rules:

• Set only the headers you own. Clone with new Headers(request.headers) and set the specific keys you need. Do not blanket-forward all inbound headers to an upstream fetch or rewrite target — user-controlled headers can leak credentials, override framework internals (e.g. x-middleware-subrequest, see § The Auth Reality), or exceed header-size limits (431 Request Header Fields Too Large).
• Cookies for the client go on the response. Mutating request.cookies changes only the request object the route sees, not the cookie stored by the browser — set browser-visible cookies with response.cookies.set(...).
• Do not import `cookies()` from `next/headers` here. That API is scoped to render-time route code (Server Components, Server Functions, Route Handlers) and reads the wrong context at the request boundary. Read with the synchronous request.cookies.get(...); write with response.cookies.set(...).
• Let `NextResponse.rewrite()` own internal RSC/Flight headers — do not hand-roll a fetch()-based rewrite that must re-implement them (see the response-shapes note above).

Edge Runtime Constraints (middleware.ts only)

These constraints apply to `middleware.ts` on the Edge Runtime. On proxy.ts (Node.js) the Node APIs below are available — but the performance discipline in § Performance Discipline still applies.

Edge code is bundled and shipped to Edge nodes globally. Cold-start is fast (~10–50ms) but the trade is a tight capability surface. Anything you import — including transitive dependencies — must be Edge-compatible. A single import of a Node-only package breaks the build.

Practical consequence on Edge: don't reach for ORMs, full SDKs, or complex libraries. Hand-roll the small piece you need (decode a JWT, hash a token, parse a cookie). If the work genuinely needs Node — verifying a webhook signature with a vendor SDK, hitting a database — either move to proxy.ts on Node.js (Next.js 16) or push the work down into a Route Handler / Server Action.

Background work: waitUntil

The NextFetchEvent second argument exposes waitUntil(promise), which extends the request's lifetime until the promise settles — for fire-and-forget work that must not block the response (analytics beacons, audit logging). Use it only for non-critical side effects; if the side effect must complete for correctness, it belongs in the route/action/job that owns the operation, not in proxy.

import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
import type { NextFetchEvent, NextRequest } from 'next/server'

export function proxy(request: NextRequest, event: NextFetchEvent) {
  event.waitUntil(
    fetch('https://analytics.example.com', {
      method: 'POST',
      body: JSON.stringify({ pathname: request.nextUrl.pathname }),
    }).catch(() => undefined),
  )
  return NextResponse.next()
}

The Canonical Pattern Library

1. Authentication UX gate (NOT a security boundary)

export function proxy(request: NextRequest) {
  const session = request.cookies.get('session')?.value
  const { pathname } = request.nextUrl

  const isProtected = pathname.startsWith('/dashboard') || pathname.startsWith('/admin')
  if (isProtected && !session) {
    const url = new URL('/login', request.url)
    url.searchParams.set('redirectTo', pathname)
    return NextResponse.redirect(url)
  }

  return NextResponse.next()
}

export const config = {
  matcher: ['/dashboard/:path*', '/admin/:path*'],
}

This redirect is a UX optimization — it sends a logged-out user to /login quickly so they don't load a page that would fail anyway. It is not the authorization decision. The session cookie is checked for presence, not cryptographically verified, and even a perfect check here can be bypassed entirely (CVE-2025-29927) or silently skipped by a matcher change. Every protected route, Route Handler, and Server Action must verify authorization itself, ideally through a shared Data Access Layer. A per-request database lookup to validate the session does not belong here — that 50ms hits every protected page load; defer it to the route.

// In the page, route, action, or data-access layer: the REAL authorization
async function requireAdmin() {
  const session = await verifySession()           // cryptographic check, DB/role lookup
  if (!session?.roles.includes('admin')) {
    throw new Error('Forbidden')
  }
  return session
}

2. Locale routing

const LOCALES = ['en', 'es', 'fr', 'de']
const DEFAULT_LOCALE = 'en'

export function proxy(request: NextRequest) {
  const { pathname } = request.nextUrl
  const hasLocale = LOCALES.some((l) => pathname.startsWith(`/${l}/`) || pathname === `/${l}`)
  if (hasLocale) return NextResponse.next()

  const accept = request.headers.get('accept-language') ?? ''
  const detected = LOCALES.find((l) => accept.includes(l)) ?? DEFAULT_LOCALE

  return NextResponse.redirect(new URL(`/${detected}${pathname}`, request.url))
}

A first-visit user lands on /about, gets redirected to /en/about. Subsequent visits to locale-prefixed paths pass through. The redirect-once pattern keeps the URL canonical and lets the rest of the app assume locale is in the path. (If you use next-intl or a similar library, note that its middleware export must also be renamed to proxy under Next.js 16 — check the library's v16 migration notes.)

3. A/B testing via rewrite

export function proxy(request: NextRequest) {
  if (request.nextUrl.pathname !== '/pricing') return NextResponse.next()

  let variant = request.cookies.get('pricing-variant')?.value
  if (!variant) {
    variant = crypto.randomUUID().charCodeAt(0) % 2 === 0 ? 'a' : 'b' // Edge-safe random pick
  }

  const url = new URL(`/pricing-${variant}`, request.url)
  const response = NextResponse.rewrite(url)
  response.cookies.set('pricing-variant', variant, { maxAge: 60 * 60 * 24 * 30 })
  return response
}

The user sees /pricing in their URL bar but receives /pricing-a or /pricing-b. The cookie pins their variant so subsequent visits are consistent. The rewrite preserves the canonical URL for analytics and sharing. (Math.random() works too; crypto.randomUUID() is shown because it is available on both Edge and Node.)

4. Security header injection (with per-request CSP nonce)

export function proxy(request: NextRequest) {
  // btoa(crypto.randomUUID()) works on BOTH Edge and Node.
  // `Buffer.from(...).toString('base64')` is Node-only — it breaks the Edge build.
  const nonce = btoa(crypto.randomUUID())

  const csp = [
    `default-src 'self'`,
    `script-src 'self' 'nonce-${nonce}' 'strict-dynamic'`,
    `style-src 'self' 'nonce-${nonce}'`,
    `img-src 'self' blob: data:`,
    `font-src 'self'`,
    `object-src 'none'`,
    `base-uri 'self'`,
    `form-action 'self'`,
    `frame-ancestors 'none'`,
    `upgrade-insecure-requests`,
  ].join('; ')

  const requestHeaders = new Headers(request.headers)
  requestHeaders.set('x-nonce', nonce)
  requestHeaders.set('content-security-policy', csp)

  const response = NextResponse.next({ request: { headers: requestHeaders } })
  response.headers.set('content-security-policy', csp)
  response.headers.set('x-content-type-options', 'nosniff')
  response.headers.set('referrer-policy', 'strict-origin-when-cross-origin')
  response.headers.set('permissions-policy', 'camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()')
  return response
}

The nonce flows to the request headers (so Server Components can read it via headers() and inject it into <script> tags) and to the response headers (so the browser enforces the CSP). The policy itself is just an example; the actual rules belong to the broader security strategy in security-fundamentals. Avoid setting very large headers — they can trigger 431 Request Header Fields Too Large depending on the backend.

The nonce has a rendering cost. A per-request CSP nonce is unique per response, so it forces the affected pages into dynamic rendering — they can no longer be statically generated, served from the CDN cache, used by ISR, or kept as a PPR static shell. If you do not actually need per-request script allow-listing, prefer a static CSP in next.config headers (cacheable, no dynamic-rendering penalty) or a hash/SRI-based policy. Reach for the nonce only when 'strict-dynamic' script allow-listing genuinely requires it.

Never cache or share a nonce across responses, and never derive nonce material from untrusted inbound headers. A nonce is only safe if it is unique per response and generated server-side: caching the page that carries it (or otherwise replaying one nonce to multiple users) lets an injected script execute under a still-valid nonce, and accepting a Content-Security-Policy / nonce value supplied in the request lets an attacker control the policy. Both are the failure behind the May 2026 CSP-nonce shared-cache XSS (CVE-2026-44581 / GHSA-ffhc-5mcf-pf4q, patched 15.5.18 / 16.2.6). It is the same fact as the rendering cost, stated as a security rule: a nonce'd response and a cacheable response are mutually exclusive — stay patched, generate the nonce in proxy (never from request headers), strip inbound CSP/nonce headers from untrusted traffic on unpatched apps, keep nonce'd pages dynamic, and use a static/hash CSP for anything you want cached.

5. Geo-routing (post-Next.js-15 API)

import { geolocation } from '@vercel/functions'   // request.geo was removed in Next.js 15

export function proxy(request: NextRequest) {
  const { country } = geolocation(request)        // 'US', 'GB', … (undefined off Vercel)

  if (country === 'GB' && !request.nextUrl.pathname.startsWith('/uk')) {
    return NextResponse.redirect(new URL(`/uk${request.nextUrl.pathname}`, request.url))
  }

  return NextResponse.next()
}

`request.geo` and `request.ip` were removed from `NextRequest` in Next.js 15 — the framework kept geolocation as a Vercel-specific feature. On Vercel, read it via geolocation(request) and ipAddress(request) from @vercel/functions (install the package; the Next.js 15 codemod does this for you). On other hosts, parse the platform's own geo headers (e.g. x-vercel-ip-country, or your CDN's equivalent) and read defensively — values may be undefined locally, and may be wrong when another proxy sits in front of the deployment unless trusted-proxy support is configured. For hard enforcement (e.g. blocking a region), prefer the platform firewall/WAF where available; app-level geo routing is usually product behavior, not a security boundary.

6. Bot blocking

const BLOCKED_AGENTS = [/AhrefsBot/i, /SemrushBot/i, /MJ12bot/i]

export function proxy(request: NextRequest) {
  const ua = request.headers.get('user-agent') ?? ''
  if (BLOCKED_AGENTS.some((re) => re.test(ua))) {
    return new NextResponse('Forbidden', { status: 403 })
  }
  return NextResponse.next()
}

UA strings are trivially spoofable — bot blocking via user-agent works for honest crawlers but does not stop adversaries. Use this for noise reduction, not security.

7. Request-ID correlation

export function proxy(request: NextRequest) {
  const requestId = request.headers.get('x-request-id') ?? crypto.randomUUID()
  const requestHeaders = new Headers(request.headers)
  requestHeaders.set('x-request-id', requestId)

  const response = NextResponse.next({ request: { headers: requestHeaders } })
  response.headers.set('x-request-id', requestId)
  return response
}

The request-id flows through to the route (readable via headers()) and back out to the client (visible in DevTools). Pair with structured logging that includes the id — optionally flushed via event.waitUntil(...) — and you get end-to-end traceability.

The Auth Reality (CVE-2025-29927)

The single most important security fact about this layer: it is not an authorization boundary, and treating it as one has already caused a critical, widely-exploited vulnerability.

CVE-2025-29927 (CVSS 9.1, disclosed March 2025) let an attacker bypass middleware entirely by sending a crafted internal x-middleware-subrequest header. That header was meant for Next.js's own loop-prevention and was trusted without verifying its origin — so spoofing it made the framework skip the middleware layer, and with it every auth check implemented there. It was patched in 14.2.25 and 15.2.3 (and 12.3.5 / 13.5.9 for older lines); if you cannot upgrade, block external requests carrying x-middleware-subrequest at the edge.

The patch closed that specific hole, but the architectural lesson is permanent and reinforced by the matcher behavior above:

• The proxy/middleware auth gate is a UX optimization (fast redirect to /login), never the authorization decision.
• A matcher exclusion silently removes coverage — including for Server Actions on the excluded path.
• Therefore authorization must be enforced at the route, the Route Handler, and inside each Server Action — ideally through a single Data Access Layer that every data read/mutation passes through. Next.js's own Data Security guidance says the same: verify authn/authz at the point of data access, not (only) in the proxy.

It keeps happening — the May 2026 release

CVE-2025-29927 was not a one-off. Next.js's May 2026 security release patched a cluster of advisories that hit this exact layer again, several of which defeat a proxy/middleware auth gate by a route the matcher never saw:

Two durable takeaways reinforce everything above:

1. The matcher is not a security perimeter. Three of these four are bypasses that reach a protected page through a transport variant of its URL the matcher didn't enumerate. You cannot make an auth gate sound by adding matcher rules — the framework has to enumerate every variant (the patches do), and you must still enforce authz at the route.
2. Stay patched, and patch one higher on Turbopack. Upgrade to ≥15.5.18 / ≥16.2.6 for this cluster (the Turbopack follow-up is not covered by the first-announced patch level). For CVE-2025-29927, the floor is ≥14.2.25 / ≥15.2.3. Strip or distrust framework-internal headers (e.g. x-middleware-subrequest) and inbound CSP/nonce headers from untrusted traffic when an advisory says to.

Composing Multiple Concerns

There is one proxy file. Combine concerns inside it — typically in a clear order:

export function proxy(request: NextRequest) {
  // 1. Block bots first — fast reject
  const ua = request.headers.get('user-agent') ?? ''
  if (BLOCKED_AGENTS.some((re) => re.test(ua))) {
    return new NextResponse('Forbidden', { status: 403 })
  }

  // 2. Locale detection — redirect once for first-visit users
  const localeRedirect = applyLocaleRouting(request)
  if (localeRedirect) return localeRedirect

  // 3. Auth UX gate — redirect to login for protected routes (NOT the security boundary)
  const authRedirect = applyAuthGate(request)
  if (authRedirect) return authRedirect

  // 4. Pass through with security headers + request-id
  return applyHeaders(request)
}

Each helper returns either a short-circuit NextResponse or null (continue). The shape is a small chain of guards; the file stays readable. When the chain grows past ~5 concerns, it's a signal that the layer is doing too much — push something down to per-route logic or to a separate request-time hook.

Testing

The old "this file is impossible to test" excuse no longer holds. Since Next.js 15.1, next/experimental/testing/server ships utilities to unit-test the layer:

import { unstable_doesProxyMatch, isRewrite, getRewrittenUrl, getRedirectUrl } from 'next/experimental/testing/server'

// Assert the matcher includes/excludes a path
expect(unstable_doesProxyMatch({ config, nextConfig, url: '/dashboard' })).toEqual(true)
expect(unstable_doesProxyMatch({ config, nextConfig, url: '/_next/static/x.js' })).toEqual(false)
expect(
  unstable_doesProxyMatch({ config, nextConfig, url: '/dashboard', headers: { purpose: 'prefetch' } }),
).toEqual(false)

// Exercise the function and assert the response shape
const response = await proxy(new NextRequest('https://app.example.com/about'))
expect(isRewrite(response)).toEqual(true)
expect(getRewrittenUrl(response)).toEqual('https://app.example.com/en/about')

Test three things:

1. Matcher coverage. Assert the function runs for protected paths and does not run for static assets, metadata files, prefetches, or webhooks — and at least one App Router transport/data variant where relevant.
2. Response shape. Assert the rewrite/redirect targets, cookies, headers, and short-circuit branches are exactly what callers should receive (getRedirectUrl exists for redirect responses).
3. Defense-in-depth coverage. Because proxy can be bypassed (CVE-2025-29927) or silently skipped by a matcher exclusion, the proxy-redirect test alone is not enough. Add a test that hits the protected page, Route Handler, Server Action, or Data Access Layer directly, bypassing proxy, with an unauthorized (or missing) credential and asserts it still rejects. For Server Actions, include at least one mutation test invoked through its POST transport — a green proxy test proves the UX gate redirects; only the bypass test proves the authorization boundary actually holds.

Where the project version lacks the experimental helpers, unit-test the pure helper functions and add integration tests around the real Next.js server.

Performance Discipline

Every matched request pays the cost. Three rules:

1. Tune the matcher. If only /dashboard/* needs the gate, match only /dashboard/*. Don't run checks against image fetches.
2. Cap the time budget. Target <10ms p99. Slow proxy code degrades every page on the site.
3. No per-request I/O. A network round-trip is a tax on every request — even on Node.js (`proxy.ts`), where a DB call is now possible, it is still the wrong place for one. Cache aggressively; use signed cookies that carry the data the layer needs without a lookup; defer DB checks to the route. Use waitUntil for any logging/analytics so it doesn't block the response.

The performance budget is invisible until you load-test the site and see this layer dominate the latency profile. Build it in from the start.

Migrating middleware.ts → proxy.ts

Next.js 16 ships a codemod:

npx @next/codemod@canary middleware-to-proxy .
# (the broader `npx @next/codemod@canary upgrade latest` also performs this step)

It renames the file and the exported function (middleware → proxy). Do it manually if you prefer:

1. mv middleware.ts proxy.ts (and rename the function to proxy, even with a default export).
2. Delete the old `middleware.ts` — shipping both is unstable.
3. Rename config flags: skipMiddlewareUrlNormalize → skipProxyUrlNormalize (the codemod does this too).
4. Mind the runtime change. proxy runs on Node.js only; setting runtime throws. If your code genuinely depends on the Edge Runtime, keep using middleware.ts for now (it still works with a deprecation warning) — Vercel has signalled follow-up Edge guidance in a later minor.

Common Anti-Patterns

Verification

After applying this skill, verify:

• [ ] The project version is identified and the file matches it: on Next.js 16, the file is proxy.ts with a proxy function; middleware.ts is used only when the Edge Runtime is genuinely required, and the two files never coexist. If migrating, the codemod (or equivalent) renamed the file, the exported function, and middleware-named config flags.
• [ ] config.matcher is set with build-time constants and excludes _next/static, _next/image, favicon.ico, metadata files (sitemap.xml, robots.txt), and any other paths that don't need the layer (typically webhooks); /_next/data coverage is accounted for.
• [ ] Matcher coverage is tested for protected URLs, static assets, prefetch headers, metadata files, webhooks, and at least one App Router transport/data variant where relevant.
• [ ] Authorization is enforced at the route / Route Handler / Server Action (Data Access Layer), not only in proxy; the proxy auth check is a UX redirect; the framework is patched against CVE-2025-29927 (≥14.2.25 / ≥15.2.3) and the May 2026 segment-prefetch / dynamic-route / CSP-nonce cluster (≥15.5.18 / ≥16.2.6 — and Turbopack users are on the follow-up patch, not the first-announced level).
• [ ] A defense-in-depth test exists that bypasses proxy and asserts the protected route / handler / action / Data Access Layer still rejects an unauthorized caller; Server Actions under protected pages are tested through their POST transport.
• [ ] Simpler upstream features were checked first — next.config redirects/headers, a static CSP, and the platform WAF/bot-management layer — before this layer was used.
• [ ] If a per-request CSP nonce is used, its dynamic-rendering cost (no static generation / CDN cache / ISR / PPR static shell) is acceptable, the nonce is generated server-side and never cached, shared across responses, or derived from inbound request headers (CVE-2026-44581 / GHSA-ffhc-5mcf-pf4q), and the framework is patched; otherwise a static or hash/SRI CSP is used instead.
• [ ] Only owned headers are forwarded upstream — inbound headers are not cloned wholesale onto an outgoing fetch/rewrite.
• [ ] No per-request database queries or other I/O adding >10ms — even on proxy.ts (Node.js) where it is technically possible.
• [ ] Geo/IP is read via @vercel/functions (or platform headers), handles local/undefined values, and is not treated as a security boundary — not the removed request.geo/request.ip.
• [ ] On middleware.ts (Edge), all imports are Edge-compatible (no Node crypto, fs, Buffer, child_process, net); on proxy.ts, no runtime config is set.
• [ ] Cookies are read via request.cookies and written via response.cookies.set — cookies() from next/headers is NOT imported here; cookies that need to reach the client are set on the response, not the request.
• [ ] Modified request headers use NextResponse.next({ request: { headers } }) so they flow to the route; response headers the browser needs are set on the response.
• [ ] The choice between rewrite, redirect, direct response, and next() matches whether the URL should visibly change and the HTTP semantics; static cases were checked against next.config redirects/headers first; rewrites use NextResponse.rewrite() (not a hand-rolled fetch()) so RSC/Flight headers survive soft navigation.
• [ ] waitUntil is used only for non-critical side effects.
• [ ] Multiple concerns are decomposed into named helpers and unit-tested with next/experimental/testing/server.
• [ ] Security-header injection (if used) coordinates with the broader security strategy defined in security-fundamentals.

Grounding Sources

• Next.js docs — Proxy (getting started) and proxy.js file convention. The canonical reference for the Next.js 16 proxy.ts convention, runtime, matcher, response API, waitUntil, version history, and testing utilities.
• Next.js docs — Renaming Middleware to Proxy and Upgrading to Version 16. The rename rationale, codemod, runtime change, and config-flag renames.
• Next.js docs — NextRequest. Cookies, nextUrl, and the ip/geo removal history.
• Next.js docs — cookies(). The scope of the next/headers cookie helper (Server Components, Server Functions, Route Handlers — not the request boundary).
• Next.js docs — Updating Data / Server Actions. Server Actions/Functions use HTTP POST under the hood and require action-owned authorization.
• Next.js PR — remove geo and ip from NextRequest (#68379) and Vercel KB — geo/IP headers with Vercel Functions. The Next.js 15 geo/ip removal and the @vercel/functions replacement.
• GitHub Advisory — CVE-2025-29927 Authorization Bypass in Next.js Middleware (GHSA-f82v-jwr5-mffw), plus Vercel's firewall changelog and postmortem. The auth-bypass CVE, affected/patched versions, and the x-middleware-subrequest mitigation.
• Vercel — Next.js May 2026 security release and the four advisories it patched: CVE-2026-44575 / GHSA-267c-6grr-h53f (segment-prefetch middleware/proxy bypass), CVE-2026-45109 / GHSA-26hh-7cqf-hhc6 (Turbopack incomplete-fix follow-up), CVE-2026-44574 / GHSA-492v-c6pp-mqqv (dynamic-route parameter injection bypass), and CVE-2026-44581 / GHSA-ffhc-5mcf-pf4q (CSP-nonce shared-cache XSS). Patched in 15.5.18 / 16.2.6.
• Next.js docs — Edge Runtime and Vercel docs — Edge Runtime. The Edge capability surface middleware.ts runs against, and the per-plan code-size limit (after gzip: 1 MB Hobby / 2 MB Pro / 4 MB Enterprise).
• MDN — Fetch API: Request, Response, and waitUntil. The Web-standard interfaces underlying NextRequest/NextResponse and NextFetchEvent.
• RFC 9110 — HTTP Semantics. The protocol this layer operates on — methods, status codes, headers.
• OWASP — Secure Headers Project. The canonical reference for the security-header set this layer can inject (policy ownership remains with security-fundamentals).
• Next.js — Content Security Policy. The canonical per-request nonce pattern, and the static-vs-dynamic-rendering tradeoff a nonce-based CSP forces.
• Next.js — proxyClientMaxBodySize config. The body-buffering size ceiling that governs whether proxy can sit in front of large/raw payloads (e.g. webhooks).

Do NOT Use When

Skill Graph context

<!-- skill-graph-context:start (generated — do not edit by hand) -->

Classification

• Subject: frontend-engineering
• Public: true
• Domain: engineering/frontend
• Scope: Designing and reviewing the Next.js request-preprocessing layer — the single root file (proxy.ts since Next.js 16, function proxy, Node.js runtime; or the deprecated-but-retained middleware.ts, function middleware, Edge Runtime by default with a Node.js opt-in since 15.5) that runs cross-cutting request/response transforms before route resolution. Covers the proxy↔middleware runtime split and its capability consequences, the matcher config (including the _next/data always-runs and Server-Function-coverage gotchas), the NextRequest/NextResponse API (cookies/headers; geolocation()/ipAddress() from @vercel/functions after the Next.js 15 geo/ip removal), the four response shapes (next/rewrite/redirect/direct), waitUntil background work, the official next/experimental/testing/server utilities, the canonical patterns (auth gate, locale routing, A/B testing, header injection, geo-routing, bot blocking), the per-matched-request performance cost, the CVE-2025-29927 lesson that this layer is not a security boundary, and the rule that it is for cross-cutting concerns, never per-route business logic. Portable across Next.js App Router projects; principle-grounded, not repo-bound. Excludes per-route endpoint logic (route-handler-design), the Server Action surface (server-actions-design), abstract HTTP semantics (http-semantics), CSP and hardening (security-fundamentals), and the streaming model (streaming-architecture).

When to use

• design proxy.ts that redirects unauthenticated users to /login while letting public routes through, configured via a matcher
• migrate my Next.js 15 middleware.ts auth gate to the Next.js 16 proxy.ts convention
• add a proxy that generates a per-request CSP nonce and injects it into both the request and response headers
• implement locale routing that detects Accept-Language and rewrites /about to /en/about for new visitors
• my geo-routing broke after upgrading to Next.js 15 because request.geo is undefined — how do I read country now
• is it safe to rely on middleware to protect /admin, or do I need route-level auth too
• Triggers: how do I redirect unauthenticated users to login in Next.js, how do I run code before every request in Next.js, should I use middleware.ts or proxy.ts in Next.js 16, how do I migrate middleware.ts to proxy.ts, how do I set security headers globally in Next.js, how do I do locale routing in App Router, why does my middleware run on static assets, can middleware do a database query, how do I read geo or IP in Next.js middleware now, is Next.js middleware a security boundary

Not for

• implement a /api/posts POST endpoint (use route-handler-design)
• implement a delete-comment mutation triggered from a form button (use server-actions-design)
• explain what an HTTP 308 means vs 307 (use http-semantics)
• design the full CSP policy and the rest of the security-header strategy (use security-fundamentals)
• design a long-lived SSE stream from middleware (use streaming-architecture)
• design the CSP policy, threat model, or OWASP audit for a system (use security-fundamentals)
• decide what an HTTP method, status code, or header should mean per RFC 9110 (use http-semantics)
• design signature verification, idempotency, or retry semantics for vendor webhooks (use webhook-integration)
• Owned by server-actions-design: the internal-mutation surface invoked from the app's own UI
• Owned by server-components-design: the render path

Related skills

• Verify with: code-review, security-fundamentals
• Related: route-handler-design, server-actions-design, http-semantics, security-fundamentals, server-components-design, client-server-boundary, webhook-integration

Concept

• Mental model: |
• Purpose: |
• Boundary: |
• Analogy: The proxy/middleware layer is to a Next.js app what a building's lobby concierge is to its offices — every visitor passes through the lobby before reaching any specific floor; the concierge can glance at ID badges (auth UX gate), redirect visitors to the right elevator (locale or A/B rewrite), hand out lanyards with security policies attached (CSP nonce, request-ID header), or turn away obvious bad-faith visit