keywords — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited keywords (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Keyword work is demand translation. Raw queries are evidence of language, intent, and platform constraints; the skill turns them into targetable clusters, page/listing assignments, and measurement baselines without pretending that keywords alone create rankings. In AI search, the unit of demand is shifting from the exact keyword string toward the underlying question, entity, and topic — but the translation discipline is the same: rank evidence by provenance, map demand to the surface best able to satisfy it, then measure.
Keyword work starts before writing or page building. This skill covers:
Keywords are not ranking spells. They are evidence of how people describe a need, what stage of the buying or learning journey they are in, and which surface can answer that need best. A good keyword pass reduces ambiguity: one query cluster, one intent, one owner surface, one measurement plan.
Agents often make three mistakes without this discipline. First, they stuff repeated terms into titles or tags instead of choosing precise phrases. Second, they copy web SEO rules into marketplace fields where character, byte, and matching rules differ. Third, they let multiple pages chase the same query, splitting relevance and making tracking unreadable.
A fourth mistake is now common in 2026: treating a keyword's raw search volume as its value when most searches end with zero clicks. A fifth, sharpened by AI research tools, is laundering an LLM's generated term list into "demand" it never measured. The right move is still translation — query language becomes a target map, not a paragraph full of repeated words — but the map now weighs question/answer intent, entity coverage, click-or-citation potential, and evidence provenance alongside volume.
| User need | Use | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Research, cluster, and map keywords (including question/entity research) before content or listings are written | keywords | This skill owns demand language and target assignment. |
| Build SEO pages, schema, internal links, programmatic templates, or AI-search (AEO/GEO) content structuring | seo-strategy | SEO strategy owns implementation after target terms and intent are known. |
| Rewrite the final page, listing, error, or doc prose | writing-humanizer | Writing quality and tone are downstream of the keyword map. |
| Decide navigation, sitemap, category hierarchy, or page grouping | information-architecture | Search demand can inform IA, but IA owns findability and structure. |
| Apply the keyword map to live Etsy fields / diagnose Etsy Search Visibility | etsy | keywords produces the demand map and evidence; etsy owns final Etsy field application and platform-specific diagnostics. |
| Phase | Goal | Evidence to collect | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seed | Identify 5-15 starting concepts | Product names, user language, support questions, competitor titles, internal search, marketplace autocomplete | Seed list with source notes |
| Entity research | Identify the named entities a topic depends on | Brand/product/person/place/attribute associations, knowledge-graph signals, related concepts | Entity map (concepts and relationships) |
| Expand | Grow into a wider candidate set | Keyword tools, marketplace autocomplete, Search Console, ads terms, related searches, "People also ask" questions, conversational/AI-assistant follow-up prompts, reviews | Candidate list with rough demand and competition signals |
| Cluster | Group terms by shared meaning and likely result set | SERP or marketplace overlap, query fan-out (sub-topics an AI answer covers), modifiers, synonyms, audience/occasion/product attributes | Topic clusters with one primary term and supporting terms |
| Intent map | Decide what the searcher wants | Query wording, current results, marketplace category, funnel stage, implied/"common-sense" need | Intent label plus target surface |
| Assign | Give every cluster one owner | Existing pages/listings, planned pages/listings, canonical URLs | Keyword map with no duplicate primary targets |
| Track | Establish visibility baseline | Rank tool, Search Console, marketplace rank, impressions/clicks, AI-citation/visibility checks | Baseline and re-check date |
Not all "keyword data" is equal, and the biggest failure mode for an AI agent doing this work is treating its own generated term list as if it were measured demand. Rank evidence by provenance and never silently blend tiers:
| Tier | Source | Trust | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 — First-party measured | Your own Search Console, marketplace search-term reports (Amazon Search Query Performance, Etsy Search Analytics), internal site search, ads search-term reports | Highest — real queries that reached your surfaces, though biased toward your current catalog and brand strength | Anchor targeting and cannibalization decisions here whenever the data exists; remember it can miss future products/markets. |
| 2 — Platform-native | Marketplace autocomplete, "People also ask", related searches, Google Suggest, platform keyword tools | High — real platform behavior, but discovery evidence, not your conversion data or proof of volume | Use to expand and validate; record locale/surface; confirm intent against current results. |
| 3 — Third-party estimates | External keyword tools' volume/difficulty numbers (Ahrefs, Semrush, Helium10, etc.) | Medium — directional only; vendors disagree and numbers drift | Treat volume as relative ordering, never an exact figure; never the sole basis for a target. |
| 4 — Model-generated hypotheses | Terms an LLM (including this agent) or a query fan-out brainstorms without a data source | Lowest — plausible language, not evidence of demand | Mark as hypotheses; promote to a target only after validation against a higher tier. |
Two preservation rules:
hypothesis bucket instead of assigning it to a page/listing.Intent is not decided from wording alone. Before assigning a cluster:
Use wording as the first clue; use result-set fit as the decision.
The deliverable of a keyword pass is not a flat list of terms — it is a structured query map, one row per candidate, so a downstream agent or human can act on it without re-deriving the research. A flat list hides provenance, intent, ownership, and measurement; the map makes each of them an explicit, checkable column.
| Column | Holds | Why it must survive |
|---|---|---|
| Raw query | The exact searcher phrasing, verbatim (spelling, pluralization, locale, punctuation) | The evidence; never overwritten by normalization (see the preservation rules above). |
| Normalized query | The cleaned/stemmed grouping label for variants and close synonyms | Your interpretation, kept distinct from the raw evidence. |
| Modifier facets | The named facets the term carries (product type, material, audience, occasion, problem, use case, compatibility, style, locale) | Makes the long-tail structure explicit and prevents inventing facets the target does not have. |
| Source | Where the term came from (Search Console, autocomplete, tool, competitor listing, review, model) | Lets a reviewer trace the claim. |
| Evidence tier / strength | 1–4 from the Evidence Quality Ladder | Flags Tier-4 model guesses so they are not actioned as measured demand. |
| Locale / surface | Language, market, and platform the demand is for (e.g. en-US / Etsy) | Demand and field rules differ by market and platform; a term valid on one is not portable to all. |
| Intent | Informational / navigational / transactional / commercial investigation / mixed | Drives the owner-surface choice. |
| Owner surface | The one page or listing assigned the cluster's primary intent (or discard / no target) | Enforces "one cluster, one owner"; surfaces cannibalization at authoring time. |
| Baseline metric | The pre-change rank/impressions/listing stat captured before edits (or "none yet") | Ranking-change claims are unfalsifiable without it. |
| Re-check date | When the baseline will be re-measured (after crawl, index, or enough traffic) | Closes the tracking loop; "improved keywords" is not evidence until this fires. |
Example row:
| Raw query | Normalized query | Modifier facets | Source | Tier | Locale / surface | Intent | Owner surface | Baseline metric | Re-check date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| "mens wide hiking boots" | wide hiking boots mens | product: boots; audience: mens; attribute: wide; activity: hiking | Search Console | 1 | en-US / web | transactional | /mens-wide-boots | 150 impr/mo | 2026-07-01 |
A row missing owner surface, baseline metric, or re-check date is a research note, not a target — promote it only when those are filled.
| Intent | Signal words | Best target | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Informational | how, what, why, guide, tutorial, ideas | Guide, article, FAQ, documentation | "how to clean a wool rug" |
| Navigational | brand, login, app, dashboard, support | Homepage, app page, support page | "brand shipping policy" |
| Transactional | buy, order, coupon, price, near me | Product page, collection, marketplace listing | "buy waterproof picnic blanket" |
| Commercial investigation | best, vs, review, comparison, alternative | Comparison page, roundup, buyer guide | "best print on demand providers for mugs" |
Do not assign a target until intent is clear. A single phrase can change owner depending on results: "custom mug ideas" likely wants inspiration; "custom mug bulk order" likely wants a transactional page.
Conversational / answer-seeking phrasing is not a separate intent type. A conversational query like "what are the best waterproof hiking boots for wide feet?" still expresses one of the four intents above (here, commercial investigation). Use query fan-out to discover these conversational and AEO-triggering variants, then map each back to its underlying intent rather than creating a fifth category.
A keyword's strategic value is no longer its search volume alone. With AI Overviews and assistant answers now resolving a large share of queries on the results page, definitional and FAQ-style terms with high volume often drive few clicks, while product, local, and transactional terms with moderate volume convert better than their volume suggests. When prioritizing, weight each cluster by demand × click-or-citation potential, not demand alone:
Score priority clusters qualitatively against these factors (there is no per-query "zero-click probability" number any platform exposes — do not invent a formula):
| Factor | Ask |
|---|---|
| Demand | Is there evidence people search the term or close variants? |
| Click potential | Does the result set still send users to pages/listings, or does it mostly answer the query directly? |
| Citation potential | Could a strong owned surface be cited, summarized, compared, or recommended in AI-search or shopping-assistant surfaces? |
| Conversion fit | Does the query imply a buyer, lead, signup, or useful next action? |
| Owner fit | Can one existing or planned surface satisfy the dominant intent without cannibalization? |
| Evidence confidence | Is the term supported by first-party/platform data, or only by modeled/tool/AI output? |
The practical rule is qualitative: a broad definitional term may deserve a support article or FAQ, but it should not outrank a moderate-volume query with clearer commercial intent and measurable owner fit.
Platform fields are not interchangeable. Translate the same keyword cluster differently depending on where the buyer searches.
| Platform | Primary fields | Current public constraints to verify | Practical rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etsy | Listing title, category, attributes, tags | Etsy listing titles can be up to 140 characters; Etsy's current guidance favors clear, human-readable titles and says search evaluates the whole listing (title, tags, attributes, description, photo, reviews, shop signals) — title placement does not affect ranking, but leading terms are what shoppers see on mobile and in Google previews. Etsy supports up to 13 tags per listing, each tag up to 20 characters (spaces count; multi-word phrases allowed). | Write a clear human-first title and lead it with the primary keyword for shopper readability (not for a ranking boost); use all 13 tag slots with accurate multi-word phrases that fit 20 chars; fill attributes; do not pad irrelevant tags. |
| Amazon | Product title, bullets, product description, generic/backend search terms | Amazon 2025 title guidance (effective Jan 21, 2025): most categories may not exceed 200 characters including spaces, some special characters are restricted, and no word may repeat more than twice (prepositions/articles/conjunctions excepted). Backend "generic keywords" are limited by bytes, not characters — community and Amazon-staff guidance reports ~249 bytes in the US field (ASCII = 1 byte; accented/non-Latin characters cost 2+). Official docs state the limit without always publishing the exact number, so verify the live field; exceeding it can leave the backend terms unindexed. | Keep titles readable and product-specific; use backend search terms for generic synonyms not already in title/brand/bullets/description; count bytes (not characters) and stay safely under the live limit. |
| Shopify | Product/collection titles, title tags, meta descriptions, URLs, image alt text, product and collection copy | Shopify recommends readable, natural keyword phrases; it lets merchants enter up to ~70 characters for page titles (recommends ≤60 to avoid truncation) and recommends natural meta descriptions around ~160 characters. Google has no fixed <title>/meta-description length limit but truncates snippets. | Prefer collection pages for broad commercial/category terms (much higher volume; an empty collection above the grid cannot rank — add unique descriptive copy) and product pages for specific long-tail terms; keep titles and descriptions human-readable. |
| SaaS/content site | Page title, H1, headings, URL slug, body copy, internal links, meta description | Google recommends descriptive, concise title text, unique descriptions, no keyword stuffing, and page-specific summaries; AI features (AI Overviews) reuse the same indexed, well-structured content and need no special AI-only markup, chunking, or files. | One primary intent per page; supporting terms belong naturally in headings, examples, and related sections. (How the on-page answer is structured for AEO/GEO is seo-strategy and writing-humanizer work, not this skill's.) |
etsy skill — this skill supplies the demand map and evidence.<title> text descriptive and concise (Shopify recommends ≤60 chars within its ~70-char field); avoid stuffing and boilerplate. Stuffed, boilerplate, inaccurate, or unclear titles may be rewritten by Google in search results.seo-strategy and writing-humanizer.Long-tail terms are useful when specificity increases match quality. They are especially valuable for marketplaces, product catalogs, and niche content because they encode product type, audience, style, occasion, material, or problem — and increasingly for conversational and AI-answer queries.
Pattern:
[modifier] + [theme/problem] + [product or page type] + [audience/occasion]Examples:
| Weak head term | Stronger long-tail target | Why it is better |
|---|---|---|
| "mug" | "sarcastic camping mug gift for dad" | Names theme, product, audience, and occasion. |
| "blanket" | "waterproof picnic blanket for beach" | Names attribute, use case, and setting. |
| "invoice software" | "invoice software for freelance designers" | Names category and audience. |
| "running shoes" | "wide trail running shoes for muddy paths" | Names fit, activity, and terrain. |
| "running shoes" | "what are the best wide trail running shoes for muddy paths" | Conversational phrasing; same intent, AI-answer-friendly. |
Long-tail does not mean every modifier belongs in the title. Use the full phrase to choose the target, then distribute true details across the appropriate fields.
The failure mode when an agent expands a head term into long-tail is inventing modifiers that sound plausible but describe nothing the product or page actually offers. The guardrail is to expand only along named facets, and to attach a modifier only when it is true of the target. Each facet is a row; fill a cell only with an attribute that genuinely applies.
| Facet | Asks | Product / marketplace examples | SaaS / content examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product / page type | What kind of surface? | mug, tote, ring, planner, collection page | software, API, dashboard, integration, comparison guide |
| Attribute / spec | Measurable property? | waterproof, ceramic, 20oz, wide-fit, printable | automated, no-code, SOC 2, open source |
| Audience / recipient | Who is it for? | for dad, for nurses, for toddlers | for agencies, for finance teams, for developers |
| Occasion / job | When/why is it bought? | birthday, wedding, camping, back-to-school | onboarding, reporting, incident response, migration |
| Material / compatibility | Made of / works with? | sterling silver, cotton, A4, iPhone 17 | Slack, Shopify, Postgres, Next.js |
| Style / theme | What look or tone? | minimalist, vintage, sarcastic, luxury | lightweight, enterprise, visual, privacy-first |
| Problem / benefit | What job does it do? | leakproof, allergy-safe, travel-friendly | reduce churn, reconcile payouts, monitor uptime |
| Locale / market | Which market's language? | jewellery vs jewelry, UK spelling, US sizing | country-specific regulations, local terminology |
Two rules:
Pillar: "Print on Demand Guide"
- Cluster: "POD pricing strategy"
- Cluster: "How to design for POD"
- Cluster: "Best POD providers compared"
- Cluster: "POD profit margins explained"
- Cluster: "Start a POD business on Etsy"Rules:
A well-organized hub-and-spoke (pillar-cluster) structure is also how AI answer engines and featured snippets read topical authority: covering a topic's questions and entities completely, with consistent facts, is what makes a site a candidate to be summarized or cited. Cluster for authority, not just for individual rankings.
A cluster is valid when the terms share both meaning and a plausible owner surface. AI-generated or tool-generated clusters are drafts — validate them against raw queries, current result sets, and owner-surface fit before publishing a keyword map.
| Test | Keep together when | Split when |
|---|---|---|
| Same-intent test | The searcher wants the same outcome. | One phrase wants education and another wants purchase or comparison. |
| Result-overlap test | The same pages/listings repeatedly appear for the terms. | The top result types differ by page/listing class. |
| Modifier-facet test | Modifiers describe compatible variants of one target. | Modifiers imply distinct products, audiences, locations, or compliance constraints. |
| Field-fit test | Supporting terms can fit naturally in headings, body, tags, attributes, or backend terms. | The terms require keyword stuffing or unrelated fields. |
| Measurement test | One baseline and cadence can judge the cluster. | Each term needs a different metric or platform surface. |
| Type | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Topic cluster | Build authority around a broad subject | "e-commerce analytics" pillar plus reporting, attribution, and cohort articles |
| Product cluster | Cover variations of one product type | "custom mugs" with ceramic, travel, gift, and bulk-order pages |
| Comparison cluster | Own "X vs Y" or "best X for Y" demand | "Printify vs Printful" and "best POD providers for hats" |
| Question cluster | Capture informational and AI-answer queries | "How does POD work?" FAQ or explainer hub answering the topic's who/what/why questions directly |
AI answer engines lose confidence when a brand's facts are inconsistent across surfaces (different hours, names, prices, or descriptions on different sites) and may omit the brand rather than risk a wrong answer. When keyword research surfaces the entities a topic depends on — brand, product, person, place, attribute — flag that those entities must be described consistently wherever they appear. Naming the inconsistency is in scope; fixing the on-page schema/markup is seo-strategy's job.
Keyword cannibalization happens when two or more owned surfaces compete for the same query and same intent. It is not a problem when different surfaces satisfy different intents for the same head term. With zero-click AI answers now common, the subtler version is collapsing several distinct conversational intents into one overly broad page.
| Strategy | Use when | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Merge | Two thin pages/listings target the same intent | Combine useful content into one stronger target. |
| Redirect | One web page is clearly obsolete or weaker | 301 to the canonical target. |
| Differentiate | Both targets are useful but blurred | Give each a distinct intent, audience, or modifier. |
| Canonical | Duplicate or near-duplicate web variants exist | Canonical to the primary version. |
| Noindex | Low-value filter/tag page competes with a real page | Remove the low-value page from indexable search. |
| Leave alone | Same head term, different searcher intent | Track separately and document the distinction. |
Current AI tools (deep-research agents, web-search tools, marketplace and Search Console AI grouping) improve discovery and synthesis, but they do not replace keyword research because they do not own platform demand data, marketplace policies, or first-party performance baselines.
Use AI agents and research tools for:
Do not use AI agents or research tools for:
Google's current generative-search guidance says foundational SEO still applies, that query fan-out may issue related searches across subtopics, and that there is no need for special AI-only files, chunking, or rewriting. For keyword work the practical change is discovery breadth: capture conversational questions, follow-up phrasing, entities, and comparison dimensions, then cluster them by user need rather than making one page per generated variant.
Ranking claims need a baseline and a re-check window. "Improved keywords" is not evidence unless visibility, impressions, clicks, rank, AI-citation share, or marketplace listing quality changed.
| Surface | Useful measurement | Cadence |
|---|---|---|
| Google / Shopify / SaaS | Search Console impressions, clicks, CTR, average position; rank tracker for priority terms | Baseline before change; re-check 2-4 weeks after recrawl; monthly portfolio review |
| AI search (AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini) | Search Console's generative-AI performance report (impressions, pages, countries, devices, dates — note it does not currently break out by individual query); the classic Performance report for query-level data; spot-checks of whether priority questions surface/cite your pages; brand mention/visibility in generated answers; clicks/conversions attributed to AI-source referrers | Baseline before change; spot-check priority questions after publishing; monthly visibility review |
| Etsy | Listing stats, query terms where available, marketplace rank checks, tag/listing quality tooling | Baseline before edit; re-check after marketplace re-indexing; monthly review |
| Amazon | Search Query Performance, Brand Analytics when available, keyword rank, sessions, conversion, backend indexing status | Baseline before edit; re-check after indexing; monthly review |
| Content clusters | Target page traffic, internal-link clicks, query spread, cannibalization flags | Monthly cluster review; quarterly gap analysis |
Track only terms tied to a decision. If a term does not affect a page/listing assignment, title/tag/search-term field, or content plan, it is research noise. For AI-search visibility, treat presence/citation in answers and downstream conversions as the signal — classic rank position alone undercounts value when most searches are zero-click. Do not promote an "AI citation rate" as a standard platform metric; no major platform exposes one — use the available reports plus citation spot-checks and referrer data.
When using Google Search Console data, segment before drawing conclusions:
| Segment | Why it matters | Where to read it |
|---|---|---|
| Branded vs non-branded | Branded queries inflate visibility and convert for reasons unrelated to keyword strategy; non-branded queries are the real test of whether content earns demand you do not already own. | The branded-queries filter / classic Performance report (this split is query-level). |
| Query groups | AI-grouped similar queries reveal intent families, but Google says the grouping is a high-level perspective that can evolve and does not affect ranking — it does not replace raw query inspection. | Search Console Insights / Performance; inspect the generated grouping before acting. |
| Page × query pairs | Cannibalization is visible only when the same query/intent spreads across multiple owner surfaces. | The classic Performance report (the generative-AI report has no individual-query dimension). |
| Country / language / device | Intent and wording differ by market and device. | Classic Performance report dimensions. |
| Generative-AI visibility | Reports impressions, pages, countries, devices, and dates for AI-feature surfaces — read at the page grain so a wrong-owner or thin-page problem is visible. | The generative-AI performance report (no query dimension; drop to the classic report for page × query diagnosis). |
If Search Console's AI-powered configuration or query groups are used, inspect the generated filters/grouping before acting. AI-assisted analysis reduces setup time; it does not remove the need to verify the query set and owner-surface decision.
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Correct approach |
|---|---|---|
| Keyword stuffing | Repetition makes titles and snippets worse, looks spammy, and hurts conversion. | Use a few precise terms naturally; front-load mobile titles. |
| Field copying | Pasting the same phrase into title, tags, description, and backend fields wastes constrained space. | Give each field a distinct job. |
| Platform flattening | Applying Google SEO limits to Etsy or Amazon ignores marketplace-specific fields and algorithms. | Translate by platform. |
| Byte-blind Amazon fields | Counting characters instead of bytes can overflow the backend field and leave its terms unindexed. | Count bytes; verify the live limit and stay under it. |
| AI keyword laundering | A generated keyword list looks authoritative but has no demand source. | Mark generated terms as Tier-4 hypotheses until validated by platform/search evidence. |
| Intent by wording alone | The phrase suggests one intent, but the live result set shows another. | Validate priority clusters against current SERP or marketplace result types. |
| Query-group overtrust | Search Console or a tool groups variants with AI, then the agent treats the group as final. | Use grouped views for discovery, then inspect raw queries before assigning owners. |
| Brand/non-brand mixing | Branded traffic masks whether non-branded keyword work is improving. | Segment branded, non-branded, and mixed queries before judging progress. |
| Fan-out page spam | AI search suggests many related variants, and the agent makes one page per variant. | Cluster by user need and owner surface; avoid scaled low-value pages. |
| Amazon exact-match tunnel vision | The map repeats literal terms but misses use cases, compatibility, buyer questions, and claims that semantic marketplace systems infer. | Capture explicit and implied intent evidence, then translate it into accurate fields without stuffing. |
| Volume worship | High-volume head terms are often too broad, too competitive, or zero-click. | Balance demand with intent, click/citation potential, and achievable surface. |
| Orphan clusters | Keyword clusters with no owner page/listing never become usable. | Assign every cluster or discard it. |
| Unmeasured edits | No baseline means no evidence of improvement. | Capture current rank/impressions/listing stats before changing fields. |
| Cannibalization by enthusiasm | Creating a new page for every synonym splits authority. | Cluster synonyms and give one canonical owner. |
| AI-visibility blindness | Reporting only classic rank ignores zero-click AI answers where the value now sits. | Add AI-citation/visibility spot-checks to the tracking plan. |
Verify high-stakes platform work against current docs before applying. As of the 2026-06-11 review:
seo-strategy/writing-humanizer work. The generative-AI performance report breaks out by page/country/device/date but not by individual query.These are grounding points, not permanent invariants. Re-check them when platform policy matters.
writing-humanizer, seo-strategy, or information-architecture as appropriate.| Use instead | When |
|---|---|
seo-strategy | You need to build pages, schema markup, internal links, programmatic SEO templates, or AEO/GEO/AI-search content implementation. |
writing-humanizer | You need the final listing, page, doc, or marketing prose written or edited for tone/readability. |
information-architecture | You need navigation, sitemap, category hierarchy, page grouping, or wayfinding decisions. |
etsy | You need to apply the keyword map to live Etsy listings or diagnose Etsy Search Visibility specifically. |
| Current platform docs | You need legally or commercially sensitive marketplace compliance decisions. |
<!-- skill-graph-context:start (generated — do not edit by hand) -->
Classification
knowledge-organizationtrueproduct/searchWhen to use
keyword-skill, keyword-research-skillNot for
Related skills
seo-strategy, writing-humanizerseo-strategy, writing-humanizer, information-architecture, etsyConcept
Grounding
universalhttps://help.etsy.com/hc/en-us/articles/360000336307-How-to-Use-Tags-to-Get-Found-in-Search, https://help.etsy.com/hc/en-us/articles/115015628707-How-to-Create-a-Listing, https://www.etsy.com/seller-handbook/article/1399426136697, https://help.etsy.com/hc/en-us/articles/25869947521175-How-to-Use-the-Etsy-Search-Visibility-Page, https://sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/b2b15728-0d43-453e-974f-59eb63f73059, https://sellercentral.amazon.com/help/hub/reference/external/GYTR6SYGFA5E3EQC?locale=en-US, https://sellercentral.amazon.com/help/hub/reference/external/G23501?locale=en-US, https://sellercentral.amazon.com/help/hub/reference/external/GF2C2L6RCFZGWBXC?locale=en-US, https://www.amazon.science/publications/cosmo-a-large-scale-e-commerce-common-sense-knowledge-generation-and-serving-system-at-amazon, https://www.amazon.science/blog/building-commonsense-knowledge-graphs-to-aid-product-recommendation, https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/title-link, https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/snippet, https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-features, https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/ai-optimization-guide, https://help.shopify.com/en/manual/promoting-marketing/seo/adding-keywords, https://help.shopify.com/en/manual/promoting-marketing/seo/seo-overviewKeywords
keyword research, search intent mapping, keyword clustering, topical cluster, seed keyword expansion, long-tail keyword, marketplace keyword optimization, keyword cannibalization, rank tracking cadence, AI search keyword research<!-- skill-graph-context:end -->
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.