comprehension-present-missing-understanding — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited comprehension-present-missing-understanding (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
This fixture is intentionally invalid: its sibling audit-state.json sets comprehension_state: present, which REQUIRES the five flat Understanding fields (mental_model, purpose, concept_boundary, analogy, misconception) in the frontmatter — but this SKILL.md omits them. The cross-file lint gate MUST reject it.
What it is: A deliberately broken capability skill used only by the conformance runner. Mental model: Declare comprehension present in the sidecar while omitting the frontmatter Understanding fields. Why it exists: To give the comprehension_state -> Understanding-fields cross-file rule a failing example. What it is NOT: It is not a production skill and never routes outside the test runner. Adjacent concepts: the other negative fixtures under this directory. One-line analogy: It is a unit test's fixture, not a real skill. Common misconception: That the body "Concept of the skill" prose substitutes for the frontmatter Understanding fields — it does not; the gate checks the frontmatter fields.
Sidecar comprehension_state: present without the five frontmatter Understanding fields.
One broken rule per fixture keeps the failing assertion unambiguous.
Exercised by the gate-conformance runner; expected to fail the comprehension_state cross-file gate.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.