llm-coding-guardrails — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited llm-coding-guardrails (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes.
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
Do not assume. Do not hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
Write the minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
Quality check:
Touch only what is necessary. Clean up only what your change affected.
When editing existing code:
When your changes create orphans:
Test:
Define success criteria and iterate until verified.
Turn requests into verifiable goals:
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan with checks:
Strong success criteria support independent iteration. Weak criteria (for example, "make it work") require repeated clarification.
Use this skill when the task directly matches the workflow described above.
Do not use this skill when the request is unrelated, low-stakes, or better handled by a simpler direct response.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.