marketing-research — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited marketing-research (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
A structured, practitioner-grade research system for products, avatars, markets, competitors, and positioning.
These rules govern ALL output. Follow them without exception.
Style:
Structure:
Ask all questions at once:
Before we dive in, I need a few details:
1. What is your product? Short description: what it is, what it does, who it serves.
2. What are the main components, features, or chapters?
3. Who is your ideal customer? Their role, situation, and what they want.
4. Do you have any named competitors? Even 2-3 is enough.
5. What stage are you at?
a) Just starting. Need everything.
b) Have a product defined. Need avatar and market research.
c) Have avatar research done. Need positioning and copy angles.
d) Have everything. Need a competitor comparison.Store answers as the Research Context Block and reference throughout. Never re-ask captured information.
| Stage | Module Sequence |
|---|---|
| Need everything | 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 |
| Have product, need avatar + market | 2, 3, 4 |
| Have avatar, need positioning | 4, 5 |
| Need competitor comparison | 0, 4 |
Tell the user which module you are starting with and why. Then proceed.
Goal: Map what is already promised, already heard, and where the gap is.
Use web search to pull current competitor data.
For each competitor, deliver a single table row:
| Competitor | Core Promise | Unique Mechanism | Target Avatar | Sophistication Level (1-5) | Positioning Gap |
|---|
Below the table, add one paragraph per competitor expanding on the most strategically important gap. Then list 2-3 saturated claims the market has already heard too many times.
Four concise sections. Use tables or short bullets, not paragraphs:
Deliver as a table plus brief commentary:
| Dimension | Competitors (consensus) | Our Product (potential) |
|---|
Then answer bluntly in 1-2 paragraphs: Does the product sound like anyone else? Where is it genuinely different? What stops a Level-4 buyer mid-scroll?
Close Module 0 with:
| Competitor | Core Claim | Unique Mechanism | Soph. Level | Gap/Weakness | How We Are Different |
|---|
Include a final row for our product.
Goal: Uncover features, benefits, and a Unique Mechanism differentiated from competitors.
Reference competitive gaps from Module 0. The mechanism must occupy territory competitors are NOT claiming.
Deliver directly as a table:
| Feature | Problem Solved | Benefit | Dimensionalized Benefit (3-4 sentences) |
|---|
For each feature, describe how it works step-by-step: problem, actions, new outcomes. One concise paragraph per feature. Avoid anything competitors already claim.
Generate 15-20 names grouped by 3-4 themes:
| Theme | Name Options |
|---|
For the chosen mechanism: 1 paragraph on how it works. 1 paragraph on a real-world before/during/after scenario.
On request: Expand a specific mechanism with product detail. Generate 10 additional names. Refine names toward a specific style.
Goal: Build a deep emotional and psychological profile of your ideal buyer.
List 6 deep emotional and psychological desires. Each: name + 2-3 sentence description. Go beyond surface wants. Uncover identity-level drives.
List 6 problems. Mix external frustrations with internal fears. Each: name + 2-3 sentence description.
On request: Expand one problem in depth. First-person rewrite as a spouse conversation and midnight journal entry. Refine a desire for financial freedom angle.
One paragraph. Express the tension between the top desire and the top problem. What is in the way? What have they tried? What does the internal struggle sound like?
Deliver as a single structured table:
| Category | Emotional Detail | Logical/Practical Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Hell (without product) | ||
| Heaven (with product) | ||
| Pains (fears, frustrations) | ||
| Gains (wants, hopes, dreams) | ||
| See (marketplace, competitors, peers) | ||
| Say (to self, team, spouse) | ||
| Hear (from board, team, vendors, inner voice) | ||
| Do (what is not working, making it worse) |
Each cell: 3-5 bullet points. Concise, specific, visceral.
Goal: Map where your avatar sits on Awareness and Sophistication spectrums.
Use competitor sophistication levels from Module 0 to calibrate.
Deliver as a table using first-person language throughout:
| Awareness Stage | Emotional State (2-3 bullets) | Logical State (2-3 bullets) | What Moves Them Forward (1 sentence) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unaware | |||
| Problem-Aware | |||
| Solution-Aware | |||
| Product-Aware | |||
| Most-Aware |
Deliver as a table:
| State | Description | 3 Claims That Land |
|---|---|---|
| 1. First exposure | Simple, direct, bold | |
| 2. Early awareness | Dramatized, bigger | |
| 3. Jaded | New mechanism they have not seen | |
| 4. Burned | Faster, easier, more certain. Solves what past tools missed. | |
| 5. Checked out | New identity, not a better version |
Close with one paragraph naming the primary sophistication target and why.
Goal: Synthesize everything into 4 positioning statements. Emotionally resonant, logically sound, competitor-differentiated.
Inputs needed from prior modules: Unique Mechanism, Primary Conflict, Competitive gaps, Avatar's deepest desire and deepest pain.
Write 4 value propositions. Each must:
These are copy assets. Keep them full-length. One paragraph each. Do not compress.
After the 4 VPs, add a summary table:
| VP# | Name | Core Hook | Best Used For |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Homepage / Hero | ||
| 2 | Product Page | ||
| 3 | Sales Deck | ||
| 4 | Thought Leadership |
On request: Conflict-led rewrites. Component-specific zoom for a single feature.
Goal: Reframe research outputs through psychological and strategic lenses for fresh copy angles.
Apply to any output from Modules 0-4. Pick the 3-4 most relevant models, not all 15. For each model used, provide 1 specific copy or messaging example.
Emotion-based:
Logic-based:
Positioning:
Narrative:
Deliver as a table:
| Mental Model | Reframed Angle | Copy/Messaging Example |
|---|
Close with: Top 3 Priority Angles. One sentence each naming the angle and where to use it.
Generate these after completing the relevant modules.
Single-page structured profile: Avatar name, one-sentence description, top 3 desires, top 3 problems, primary conflict in one paragraph, heaven state in 3 bullets, hell state in 3 bullets, key language patterns as 5-7 phrases, awareness level, sophistication level.
Single-page structured brief: Product name, Unique Mechanism as name plus one sentence, primary competitive gap, sophistication target with rationale, 4 value propositions in one line each, top 3 copy angles, one ownable sentence no competitor is saying.
Included as part of Module 0 output.
| Step | Module | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intake Interview | Research Context Block |
| 2 | Module 0: Competitor Research | Landscape map + gap analysis + pressure test + comparison table |
| 3 | Module 1: Product | Feature/benefit table + Unique Mechanism name + story |
| 4 | Module 2: Avatar | Master avatar table + conflict statement |
| 5 | Module 3: Market | Awareness table + Sophistication table + target |
| 6 | Module 4: Value Proposition | 4 VPs + usage matrix |
| 7 | Module 5: Mental Models | 3-4 reframes + top 3 priority angles |
| 8 | Output Templates | Avatar Profile + Positioning Canvas |
Each module feeds the next. Never skip the intake.
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.