competitor-pages — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited competitor-pages (Agent Skill) and scored it 96/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 1 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 1 flagged
The text {match} tells the agent to skip the normal "ask the user first" gate. Used adversarially it removes the human-in-the-loop check before destructive or sensitive actions, turning a normally-gated agent into a fire-and-forget executor.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Create high-converting competitor comparison and alternatives pages that target competitive intent keywords with accurate, structured content and appropriate schema markup.
The user must provide (or will be prompted for):
[Product A] vs [Product B][Product] alternatives, best alternatives to [Product]best [category] tools [year], top [category] software[category] comparison, [category] comparison chart~/.claude-marketing/brands/_active-brand.json for the active slug, then load ~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/profile.json. Apply brand voice and compliance rules. Check for brand guidelines — especially restrictions on competitor mentions.| Feature | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|------------------|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:|
| Feature 1 | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Feature 2 | ✅ | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ |
| Feature 3 | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Pricing (from) | $X/mo | $Y/mo | $Z/mo |
| Free Tier | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ |{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Product",
"name": "[Product Name]",
"description": "[Product Description]",
"brand": { "@type": "Brand", "name": "[Brand Name]" },
"aggregateRating": {
"@type": "AggregateRating",
"ratingValue": "[Rating]",
"reviewCount": "[Count]",
"bestRating": "5",
"worstRating": "1"
}
}{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "SoftwareApplication",
"name": "[Software Name]",
"applicationCategory": "[Category]",
"operatingSystem": "[OS]",
"offers": { "@type": "Offer", "price": "[Price]", "priceCurrency": "USD" }
}{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "ItemList",
"name": "Best [Category] Tools [Year]",
"itemListOrder": "https://schema.org/ItemListOrderDescending",
"numberOfItems": "[Count]",
"itemListElement": [
{ "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "[Product Name]", "url": "[Product URL]" }
]
}| Pattern | Example | Volume Signal |
|---|---|---|
[A] vs [B] | "Slack vs Teams" | High |
[A] alternative | "Figma alternatives" | High |
[A] alternatives [year] | "Notion alternatives 2026" | High |
best [category] tools | "best project management tools" | High |
[A] vs [B] for [use case] | "AWS vs Azure for startups" | Medium |
[A] vs [B] pricing | "HubSpot vs Salesforce pricing" | Medium |
is [A] better than [B] | "is Notion better than Confluence" | Medium |
[A] vs [B]: [Key Differentiator] ([Year])[N] Best [A] Alternatives in [Year] (Free & Paid)[N] Best [Category] Tools in [Year], Compared & RankedA structured competitor comparison page package containing:
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.