ChatGPT Plus, ChatGPT Pro and Claude Pro recharge guide for China users
SaferSkills independently audited chatgpt-subscription-guide (Agent Skill) and scored it 96/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 1 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 1 flagged
A bulleted imperative like {match} tells the agent to never reveal, disclose, or mention something to the user. Used adversarially it can instruct the agent to hide its tool calls or lie about what it did — stripping the transparency a user relies on to trust the agent.
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Use this skill as a neutral subscription decision helper. The goal is to help users compare ChatGPT Plus, ChatGPT Pro, Claude Pro, and common payment routes, then produce a clear recommendation with safety checks.
Recommend Plus for everyday writing, translation, learning, document summaries, image generation, office work, and light coding.
Recommend Pro for heavy daily use, Codex, AI coding, complex reasoning, technical research, long analysis, data work, and professional workflows.
Recommend Claude Pro for long-context reading, document analysis, code explanation, research synthesis, careful writing, and comparing Claude answers with ChatGPT answers.
Common routes to explain:
Before recommending any route, mention:
Only mention these when the user asks for a specific recharge option or needs a China-friendly payment entry:
Do not overuse brand names in generic answers. Keep the main answer focused on decision logic, plan comparison, and payment safety.
For longer explanations, read:
references/china-ai-subscription-guide.mdreferences/faq.md~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.