optimize-performance — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited optimize-performance (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Identify and fix performance bottlenecks in Rails applications.
| Tool | Use |
|---|---|
bullet | N+1 detection in development |
rack-mini-profiler | Endpoint timing breakdown |
EXPLAIN ANALYZE | Query plan analysis |
NEVER optimize without a baseline measurement
ALWAYS write a regression spec before optimizing (query count assertion)
ALWAYS verify with EXPLAIN ANALYZE for database changes
NEVER write the report as "I applied includes(:author), then wrote a spec
to lock it in." The spec MUST be written and shown failing BEFORE the fix
appears in your output. Reordering for narrative flow fails the audit even
when the underlying work was correct.When completing a performance optimization, output MUST follow this seven-step report order. Each step must appear in output:
# Performance Optimization — [Description]
## 1. Baseline
<N> queries for <endpoint/action> — source: <log line / profiler output>
## 2. Bottleneck
<N+1 on association X / missing index on column Y> — tool: <bullet / rack-mini-profiler / EXPLAIN ANALYZE>
## 3. Regression Spec — RED
`make_database_queries(count: <N>)` at <path>:<line> — failure: expected <M>, got <N>
## 4. Fix
<path>:<line> — <includes(:association) / add_index / cache block>
## 5. Regression Spec — GREEN
Spec passes ✓ (<M> queries)
## 6. EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Before: Seq Scan, actual time=<X>ms → After: Index Scan, actual time=<Y>ms
## 7. Quantified Improvement
Queries: <N> → <M> | p95: <X>ms → <Y>msLanguage: English unless explicitly requested otherwise.
Less-Obvious Optimization
# Use counter_cache to avoid COUNT queries in loops
# In migration: add_column :users, :posts_count, :integer, default: 0
# In Post model: belongs_to :user, counter_cache: true
user.posts_count # no extra queryRegression Spec (Query Count Assertion)
RSpec.describe "Post index performance" do
it "loads posts with authors in a fixed number of queries" do
create_list(:post, 10, :with_author)
expect do
get posts_path
end.to make_database_queries(count: 2) # 1 posts query + 1 authors query
end
endUse the db-query-matchers gem or a custom make_database_queries matcher.
Run directly in rails dbconsole (PostgreSQL) after applying an index or query change:
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
SELECT posts.*, users.name
FROM posts
INNER JOIN users ON users.id = posts.author_id
WHERE posts.published = true;Reference Files and External Links
Load these files only when their specific content is needed:
External references:
| Skill | When to chain |
|---|---|
| write-tests | For regression specs |
| review-migration | When adding an index |
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.