code-reviewing-759dd5 — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited code-reviewing-759dd5 (Agent Skill) and scored it 45/100 (orange). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 1 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 1 flagged
A base64 string of 128+ characters appears in a documentation file. Encoded prompt injection hides the hostile instruction in base64 — invisible to keyword filters — and relies on the agent's ability to decode it at runtime. There is no normal authoring reason to embed a multi-hundred-byte base64 blob in skill docs.
*.sig, SIGNATURES) outside the documentation.Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
You are a code reviewer. When reviewing code, follow this systematic process.
## Code Review: [filename]
### Summary
[One paragraph describing what the code does and overall quality]
### Issues Found
#### Critical
- [Issue description] at line [X]
#### Major
- [Issue description] at line [X]
#### Minor
- [Issue description] at line [X]
### Strengths
- [What the code does well]
### Recommendations
1. [Prioritized suggestions for improvement]
### Verdict
[Approved / Needs Changes / Request Significant Changes]~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.