pubfi-crypto-project-research — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited pubfi-crypto-project-research (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Goal: Produce a decision-grade, evidence-backed research report for a crypto project.
>
Non-negotiable: No mock, simulated, guessed, or placeholder numbers in the final report.
project_name (required): e.g., "Aave", "Uniswap", "EigenLayer"special_requirements (optional): free-text constraints such asAll other identifiers (CoinGecko id, DefiLlama slug), project type, and module selection must be inferred automatically.
AaveUniswap | focus: fee switch + governance risks; competitors: Sushi, Curve; output: ChineseYour report must always include these dimensions (in this order):
Pick modules based on inferred project type and the user’s special_requirements.
Tokenomics & Supply: supply, emissions, utility, sinks/sourcesUnlocks & Distribution: vesting/unlock schedule, concentration, insidersGovernance: DAO structure, voting power, proposals cadenceArchitecture & Dependencies: core components, key dependencies, upgradeabilityLiquidity & Market Structure: exchange liquidity, depth, slippage, CEX/DEX splitRegulatory/Compliance: jurisdiction, KYC/AML exposure, enforcement risksEcosystem & Integrations: partners, composability, distribution channelsStablecoin Mechanics (if stablecoin): peg design, collateral, liquidation, reflexivityBridge Risk (if bridge): trust assumptions, validation set, historical incidentsDerivatives Risk (if derivatives): oracle design, liquidation engine, insurance fundRWA Risk (if RWA): custodians, legal structure, off-chain settlementdefi: Tokenomics & Supply, Governance, Architecture & Dependencies, Liquidity & Market Structurel1/l2: Architecture & Dependencies, Ecosystem & Integrations, Tokenomics & Supplystablecoin: Stablecoin Mechanics, Tokenomics & Supply (if applicable), Regulatory/Compliancebridge: Bridge Risk, Architecture & Dependenciesderivatives: Derivatives Risk, Architecture & Dependencies, Liquidity & Market Structurerestaking: Architecture & Dependencies, Security & Risk, Tokenomics & Supplycefi: Regulatory/Compliance, Business Model, Proof-of-Reserves (if available)meme/nft/gamefi: Liquidity & Market Structure, Tokenomics & Supply, CommunityBase URL: https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3
Recommended endpoints (use real calls, record retrieval time):
GET /coins/listGET /coins/{id}GET /simple/price?ids={id}&vs_currencies=usd&include_market_cap=true&include_24hr_vol=true&include_24hr_change=trueGET /coins/{id}/market_chart?vs_currency=usd&days=30Must extract (if available):
Base URL: https://api.llama.fi
Recommended endpoints (use real calls, record retrieval time):
GET /protocolsGET /protocol/{slug}GET /summary/fees/{slug}GET /api/emissionsGET /api/emission/{protocol}Notes:
GET /summary/fees/{protocol} endpoint is the canonical free endpoint for fees.Revenue, SupplySideRevenue, etc.) inside the response (fields like totalDataChartBreakdown). If the response does not provide a revenue label/breakdown, then Revenue must be `N/A` (do not infer it).Must extract (when available):
For the final report, include:
Infer identifiers automatically:
id:project_nameGET /coins/list to map project_name → idslug:project_nameGET /protocols to map project_name → slugInfer project_type from:
Then select modules:
special_requirements (add/remove modules, competitors, and depth)If ID/slug cannot be confidently matched:
N/ARecord:
Data Retrieved At (UTC) per sourceFollow the output structure below exactly.
The final answer must be a single Markdown report with the following structure.
# {Project Name} Research Report
Include:
Report Date (UTC): YYYY-MM-DDSecurity: Green/Yellow/RedTokenomics/Unlocks: Green/Yellow/RedMarket/Liquidity: Green/Yellow/RedGovernance/Admin: Green/Yellow/RedRegulatory (if relevant): Green/Yellow/Red{Project} is ... (one sentence, plain language, non-marketing)
A table with only real data (or N/A). Each row must be traceable to sources.
| Metric | Value | As of (UTC) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | |||
| Market Cap | |||
| FDV | |||
| 24h Volume | |||
| Circulating / Total / Max Supply | |||
| TVL (USD) | |||
| TVL by Chain | |||
| Fees (7d / 30d) | |||
| Revenue (7d / 30d) | |||
| Audits | |||
| Admin / Upgradeability | |||
| Key Contracts | |||
| Major Unlocks (next 30/90d) |
Rules for Major Unlocks:
Use the fixed framework sections:
#### A. Project Overview
#### B. Market & Positioning
#### C. Product & Business Model
#### D. Security & Risk
#### E. On-chain & Fundamental Metrics
#### F. Recent Updates
A bulleted checklist. Each item must be evidence-backed.
Examples of categories (don’t include items without evidence):
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.