prototype — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited prototype (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
When this skill is invoked:
question this prototype must answer. If the concept is vague, state the question explicitly before proceeding.
what engine, language, and frameworks are in use so the prototype is built with compatible tooling.
viable prototype looks like. What is the core question? What is the absolute minimum code needed to answer it? What can be skipped?
prototypes/[concept-name]/ where[concept-name] is a short, kebab-case identifier derived from the concept.
with:
// PROTOTYPE - NOT FOR PRODUCTION
// Question: [Core question being tested]
// Date: [Current date]Standards are intentionally relaxed:
measurable data (frame times, interaction counts, feel assessments).
prototypes/[concept-name]/REPORT.md:
## Prototype Report: [Concept Name]
### Hypothesis
[What we expected to be true -- the question we set out to answer]
### Approach
[What we built, how long it took, what shortcuts we took]
### Result
[What actually happened -- specific observations, not opinions]
### Metrics
[Any measurable data collected during testing]
- Frame time: [if relevant]
- Feel assessment: [subjective but specific -- "response felt sluggish at
200ms delay" not "felt bad"]
- Player action counts: [if relevant]
- Iteration count: [how many attempts to get it working]
### Recommendation: [PROCEED / PIVOT / KILL]
[One paragraph explaining the recommendation with evidence]
### If Proceeding
[What needs to change for a production-quality implementation]
- Architecture requirements
- Performance targets
- Scope adjustments from the original design
- Estimated production effort
### If Pivoting
[What alternative direction the results suggest]
### If Killing
[Why this concept does not work and what we should do instead]
### Lessons Learned
[Discoveries that affect other systems or future work]the recommendation. Link to the full report at prototypes/[concept-name]/REPORT.md.
written from scratch -- prototype code is not refactored into production
question can be simplified
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.