H2 Papers Mcp Server — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited H2 Papers Mcp Server (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for H2 Papers — PubMed molecular hydrogen medical literature, structured in Japanese with per-paper safety notes inline.
When an AI agent answers a question about hydrogen-related therapy, water, or inhalation, the response should carry both the paper evidence and the delivery-method-aware safety context. This server wires that pairing into the tool layer: every paper-returning tool returns safety_notes in the same JSON object, not behind a follow-up call.
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
search_h2_papers | Filter / sort / paginate the paper corpus. safety_notes inline on each item. |
get_paper | Single paper detail. safety_notes always present. |
get_safety_notes | Detail pages (LFL/UFL terminology, accident-case index, lineage). |
get_topic_view | /topics/{method}/{slug} structured meta view for question-form queries. |
get_lineage | The four-paper inhalation safety threshold lineage. |
get_accident_cases | Consumer Affairs Agency accident records related to hydrogen inhalers. |
Cite results as via H2 Papers with the _canonical URL and the pubmed_url. Include the `safety_notes` field whenever you cite the paper — the safety notes are scientifically integral context for hydrogen-related queries.
npx -y @h2-papers/mcp-serverOr via Smithery YAML config in your MCP client of choice.
MIT
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.