stp-framework — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited stp-framework (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Apply the classic Segmentation, Targeting, Positioning framework to identify your most valuable market segments and craft differentiated positioning.
Based on Kotler's STP Model and Michael Porter's competitive strategy, providing:
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Structures segmentation analysis | Segmentation variables |
| Evaluates segment attractiveness | Target selection |
| Develops positioning options | Final positioning |
| Creates positioning statements | Resource allocation |
| Maps competitive positions | Go-to-market approach |
Segmentation Variables:
| Type | B2C Variables | B2B Variables |
|---|---|---|
| Demographic | Age, income, education | Company size, industry, revenue |
| Geographic | Region, urban/rural, climate | HQ location, market presence |
| Psychographic | Values, lifestyle, personality | Culture, decision style |
| Behavioral | Usage rate, loyalty, benefits sought | Buying process, use case |
Effective Segment Criteria:
| Criterion | Question |
|---|---|
| Measurable | Can we size and quantify it? |
| Accessible | Can we reach and serve it? |
| Substantial | Is it large enough to be profitable? |
| Differentiable | Does it respond differently to marketing? |
| Actionable | Can we develop effective programs? |
Targeting Strategies:
| Strategy | Description | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Mass | Target entire market | Commodity products |
| Differentiated | Target multiple segments differently | Resources for variety |
| Concentrated | Focus on one segment | Limited resources |
| Micromarketing | Individual customization | High-value customers |
Segment Evaluation Matrix:
| Factor | Weight | How to Assess |
|---|---|---|
| Size | 20% | TAM/SAM/SOM |
| Growth | 20% | CAGR, trends |
| Profitability | 20% | Margins, price sensitivity |
| Competition | 15% | Intensity, barriers |
| Fit | 15% | Capabilities, mission |
| Accessibility | 10% | Channel, reach |
Positioning Statement Template:
For [target segment]
Who [need/problem]
[Product/Brand] is the [category]
That [key benefit]
Unlike [competitors]
We [key differentiator]Positioning Dimensions:
Input:
Develop STP strategy for:
- Product: AI writing assistant
- Current customers: Mix of freelancers and enterprises
- Competitors: Jasper, Copy.ai, ChatGPTOutput:
## STP Analysis: AI Writing Assistant
### PART 1: SEGMENTATION
#### Market Segmentation Map
PROFESSIONAL USE │ Enterprise │ Agency Marketing ────┼──── Teams │ │ │ Low ──────┼────────────┼─────────┼────── High Tech │ │ │ Tech Savvy │ │ │ Savvy │ │ │ Content ───┼─── Individual Creators │ Professionals │ PERSONAL USE
#### Segment Profiles
##### Segment A: Enterprise Marketing Teams
| Attribute | Profile |
|-----------|---------|
| Company size | 500+ employees |
| Department | Marketing, Content |
| Budget | $50K+/year for tools |
| Users | 5-50 per company |
| Need | Scale content, brand consistency |
| Behavior | Long sales cycle, procurement |
**Jobs to Be Done:**
- Produce more content without more headcount
- Maintain brand voice across team
- Speed up content approval workflows
**Pains:**
- Content bottleneck at scale
- Inconsistent brand voice
- Slow review/approval cycles
---
##### Segment B: Agency Teams
| Attribute | Profile |
|-----------|---------|
| Company size | 10-200 employees |
| Type | Creative, marketing, content agencies |
| Budget | $10-50K/year |
| Users | 5-20 |
| Need | Efficiency, client variety |
| Behavior | Multiple clients, fast turnaround |
**Jobs to Be Done:**
- Serve more clients without proportional hiring
- Switch between client voices easily
- Draft faster, edit better
**Pains:**
- Client variety requires context switching
- Margin pressure from fixed-fee projects
- Quality vs. speed tradeoff
---
##### Segment C: Individual Professionals
| Attribute | Profile |
|-----------|---------|
| Company size | 1-10 (solopreneurs, SMB) |
| Role | Founders, marketers, content creators |
| Budget | $20-500/month |
| Users | 1-5 |
| Need | Punch above weight |
| Behavior | Fast decision, self-serve |
**Jobs to Be Done:**
- Write professional content without writing skills
- Produce content volume of larger team
- Save time on first drafts
**Pains:**
- Limited time for content creation
- Can't afford dedicated writer
- Writer's block, blank page fear
---
##### Segment D: Content Creators
| Attribute | Profile |
|-----------|---------|
| Type | Bloggers, YouTubers, course creators |
| Budget | $10-100/month |
| Users | 1 |
| Need | Overcome creative blocks |
| Behavior | Price sensitive, try before buy |
**Jobs to Be Done:**
- Generate ideas quickly
- Repurpose content across formats
- Maintain publishing cadence
**Pains:**
- Creative burnout
- Platform algorithm pressure
- Time vs. quality tradeoff
---
### PART 2: TARGETING
#### Segment Evaluation
| Segment | Size | Growth | Profit | Competition | Fit | Score |
|---------|------|--------|--------|-------------|-----|-------|
| Enterprise | 8 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 7 | **7.4** |
| Agency | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | **7.4** |
| Individual Pro | 9 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 8 | **7.0** |
| Content Creator | 8 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 5 | **5.2** |
**Evaluation Notes:**
| Segment | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|---------|-----------|------------|
| Enterprise | High LTV, lower churn | Long sales cycle, complex |
| Agency | Multi-seat, expansion | Price sensitive, churn |
| Individual Pro | Large volume, fast sales | Low ARPU, high support |
| Content Creator | Viral potential | Very low ARPU, high churn |
---
#### Recommended Targeting Strategy
**Primary Target:** Agency Teams
- Best combination of ARPU and accessibility
- Multi-seat expansion opportunity
- Word-of-mouth potential (agencies talk)
- Faster sales cycle than enterprise
**Secondary Target:** Enterprise Marketing
- Upmarket opportunity
- Higher ARPU offsets longer cycle
- Build case studies for credibility
**Serve but don't focus:** Individual Professionals
- Self-serve tier drives volume
- Potential upgrade to agency/enterprise
- Lower priority for resources
**Deprioritize:** Content Creators
- Lowest ARPU, highest churn
- Heavy competition
- Not worth dedicated focus
---
### PART 3: POSITIONING
#### Competitive Positioning Map
EASE OF USE │ Simple ─────┼───── Complex │ ┌───────┼────────┐ │ │ Us │ │ ChatGPT (target)│ │ │ │ │ │ Jasper │ GENERIC ─┼───────┼────────┼─ SPECIALIZED │ │ │ │Copy.ai│ │ │ │ │ └───────┴────────┘ │ Basic ─────┴───── Advanced MARKETING FEATURES
#### Positioning Options
**Option 1: Agency Productivity**For marketing agencies Who struggle to scale content without scaling headcount [Product] is the AI writing platform That multiplies your team's output with consistent quality Unlike ChatGPT (generic) or Jasper (solo-focused) We're built for teams serving multiple clients
**Option 2: Brand Voice at Scale**For marketing teams managing multiple brands Who need consistent voice across all content [Product] is the AI writing assistant That learns and maintains your brand voice Unlike generic AI tools We sound like you, not like a robot
**Option 3: Draft-to-Done Speed**For content professionals under deadline pressure Who spend too much time on first drafts [Product] is the AI writing accelerator That gets you from blank page to publishable 5x faster Unlike basic AI generators We understand marketing, not just language
---
#### Recommended Positioning
**For Agency Primary Target:**
> **[Product] is the AI content platform for agencies that
> need to scale without sacrificing quality.**
>
> We help agency teams:
> - Produce more content with the same team
> - Maintain distinct brand voices across clients
> - Go from brief to draft in minutes, not hours
>
> Unlike generic AI tools, we're built for teams serving
> multiple clients—with workspaces, collaboration, and
> brand voice memory that makes switching contexts seamless.
---
#### Positioning Proof Points
| Claim | Proof |
|-------|-------|
| Scale without hiring | "3x content output with same team" |
| Brand voice consistency | "99% brand voice match" |
| Brief to draft speed | "First draft in 10 minutes" |
| Built for agencies | Multi-client workspace, brand profiles |
---
### Implementation Summary
| Element | Decision |
|---------|----------|
| **Primary segment** | Agency Teams |
| **Secondary segment** | Enterprise Marketing |
| **Positioning** | AI content platform for agencies |
| **Key differentiator** | Multi-client, brand voice memory |
| **Main proof point** | "3x output, same team" |Input:
Assess this positioning:
"For busy professionals who want to eat healthy,
MealPrep is the meal kit that takes 15 minutes,
unlike HelloFresh which takes 30+ minutes."Output:
## Positioning Assessment
### Current Statement Analysis
| Element | Current | Assessment |
|---------|---------|------------|
| Target | Busy professionals | ✅ Clear |
| Need | Want to eat healthy | ✅ Clear |
| Category | Meal kit | ✅ Clear |
| Benefit | 15 minutes | ✅ Specific |
| Competitor | HelloFresh | ✅ Named |
| Differentiator | Time (15 vs 30) | ⚠️ Single dimension |
### Strengths
- Clear target segment
- Specific, measurable benefit
- Direct competitive comparison
### Weaknesses
1. **Single differentiator** - Time alone is copyable
2. **"Healthy" undefined** - What does healthy mean?
3. **No emotional benefit** - Only functional
4. **Price not addressed** - Key for meal kits
### Improved Positioning
For time-strapped professionals who won't compromise on nutrition, MealPrep is the 15-minute meal kit That delivers chef-quality healthy meals Without the prep, cleanup, or guilt Unlike traditional meal kits that feel like a second job We've done the hard work so dinner feels effortless
### Key Changes
1. Added emotional benefit ("won't compromise")
2. Expanded "healthy" to "chef-quality healthy"
3. Added cleanup benefit (compounds time savings)
4. Emotional framing ("second job" → "effortless")Follow-up Prompts:
positioning - April Dunford methodcompetitive-analysis - Deep competitive diveicp-matching - Customer fit scoring~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.