pricing-strategy — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited pricing-strategy (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Design products around price using Madhavan Ramanujam's "Monetizing Innovation" methodology—determine willingness to pay before you build, not after.
Use this skill when you need to:
This skill is particularly valuable for:
Source: Madhavan Ramanujam & Georg Tacke - Monetizing Innovation: How Smart Companies Design the Product Around the Price (2016)
Core Principle: Price determines product, not the other way around. Companies that design products around willingness to pay—rather than pricing as an afterthought—capture dramatically more value.
"Price isn't a number. It's the perceived value that your product holds for the customer."
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Structures production workflow | Final creative direction |
| Suggests technical approaches | Equipment and tool choices |
| Creates templates and checklists | Quality standards |
| Identifies best practices | Brand/voice decisions |
| Generates script outlines | Final script approval |
When invoked, I will guide you through the Monetizing Innovation methodology:
Provide information about your pricing situation:
Example prompts:
Information that helps:
Before setting prices, identify which failure type threatens your product:
#### The Four Types of Monetization Failure
| Failure Type | Symptoms | Root Cause |
|---|---|---|
| Feature Shock | Too many features, high price, confused value prop | Built everything instead of what customers pay for |
| Minivation | Strong adoption, weak revenue | Priced too low, leaving money on table |
| Hidden Gem | Great innovation stuck inside company | Dismissed as "not our core business" |
| Undead | No willingness to pay at any price | Built on assumptions, not customer evidence |
Diagnostic Questions:
Critical: This happens BEFORE product design is finalized, not after.
#### The Four Key Questions
Ask potential customers:
Follow every answer with: "Why?"
#### Research Methods
| Method | Best For | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|
| 1:1 Interviews | Deep understanding, B2B | 10-20 customers |
| Focus Groups | Testing reactions, consumer | 3-5 groups of 6-8 |
| Surveys | Quantitative validation | 100+ responses |
| Purchase Simulations | Realistic behavior data | 50+ scenarios |
#### Pro Tips for WTP Conversations
Critical shift: Segment by needs and willingness to pay, NOT demographics.
Wrong segmentation:
Right segmentation:
#### Segmentation Process
#### Identify Feature Types
| Feature Type | Definition | Identification | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leaders | Drive purchase decision, high WTP | >50% highly value, willing to pay | Emphasize, charge premium |
| Fillers | Nice-to-have, rounds out offering | 30-50% value, moderate WTP | Include in bundles |
| Killers | Low value, blocks deals if included | <20% value OR >20% actively dislike | Remove or make optional |
#### Build Good-Better-Best Tiers
GOOD (Entry) BETTER (Standard) BEST (Premium)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Core Leaders only Leaders + Key Fillers All Leaders + Fillers
Self-service Email support Priority support
Basic limits Generous limits Unlimited/Custom
$X/month $2-3X/month $5-10X/monthConfiguration Principles:
Key insight: How you charge is often more important than how much.
#### Five Monetization Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subscription | Fixed recurring payment | Predictable value delivery | Netflix, SaaS |
| Usage-Based | Pay per unit consumed | Variable consumption | AWS, Twilio |
| Freemium | Free tier + paid upgrades | High-volume acquisition | Slack, Dropbox |
| Dynamic | Prices vary by demand | Perishable inventory | Airlines, Uber |
| One-Time | Single purchase | Finite value delivery | Software licenses |
#### Model Selection Questions
#### Hybrid Approaches
Many successful products combine models:
"Behavioral pricing is the magic that happens when value pricing meets irrational customer psychology."
#### Six Proven Tactics
1. Compromise Effect When presented with 3 options, people choose the middle.
2. Anchoring First price seen influences all subsequent judgments.
3. Price = Quality Signal Higher prices imply better quality.
4. Razor/Razor Blades Low upfront cost, revenue from consumables/services.
5. Pennies-a-Day Break prices into smallest time unit.
6. Psychological Thresholds Prices just below round numbers convert better.
"When your product launches and the market is less than enthusiastic, you'll feel pressure to cut the price. That's almost always a bad idea."
#### Why Price Cuts Hurt
#### The 3-Before-1 Rule
Before approving ANY price cut, require your team to propose 3 non-pricing solutions:
#### Post-Launch Discipline
Situation: Early-stage analytics tool, competitors range from free to enterprise
Willingness-to-Pay Research Findings:
Feature Analysis:
| Feature | Leaders | Fillers | Killers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real-time dashboards | ✓ | ||
| Custom reports | ✓ | ||
| Slack integration | ✓ | ||
| 50+ data connectors | ✓ | ||
| AI predictions | ✓ (too early) | ||
| White-labeling | ✓ (only 10% need) |
Tier Structure:
STARTER ($49/mo) GROWTH ($199/mo) SCALE ($499/mo)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
3 dashboards Unlimited dashboards Unlimited + custom
5 data sources 20 data sources Unlimited sources
Email support Chat support Dedicated CSM
Slack integration SSO + audit logsMonetization Model: Subscription with usage-based overage for data volume
Behavioral Tactics Applied:
Situation: Strategy consulting firm, hourly billing, price pressure from clients
Willingness-to-Pay Research Findings:
Monetization Model Shift: From hourly to value-based
New Pricing Structure:
DIAGNOSTIC ($15K) IMPLEMENTATION ($75K) PARTNERSHIP ($25K/mo)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
2-week assessment 12-week execution Ongoing advisory
Defined deliverables Milestone-based Monthly retainer
Fixed scope Performance bonus Unlimited access
No risk to client Shared upside Predictable costKey Changes:
Result: 40% increase in average engagement value, improved client satisfaction
INTRODUCTION (2 min)
"We're exploring a new [product/service] and want to understand
what would be valuable to you. This is about understanding value,
not selling you anything."
CURRENT SITUATION (5 min)
- How do you currently solve [problem]?
- What do you spend on this today (time/money)?
- What's frustrating about current solutions?
VALUE EXPLORATION (10 min)
- What would an ideal solution do for you?
- Which of these features [show list] matter most?
- Why is [top feature] important to you?
PRICING QUESTIONS (10 min)
- "What would be an acceptable price for this?"
- "What would be an expensive price?"
- "What would be prohibitively expensive?"
- "At $X, would you definitely buy, probably buy,
probably not buy, or definitely not buy?"
- "Why did you choose that answer?"
WRAP-UP (3 min)
- What would make this a no-brainer purchase?
- Anything else we should know?TIER NAME: _______________
TARGET SEGMENT: _______________
PRICE POINT: $___/[period]
LEADERS (must-have features):
1. _______________
2. _______________
3. _______________
FILLERS (nice-to-have):
1. _______________
2. _______________
EXCLUDED (saved for higher tiers):
1. _______________
2. _______________
POSITIONING STATEMENT:
"For [segment] who need [primary job], [Tier] provides [key benefit]
at [price], unlike [alternative] which [limitation]."| Factor | Subscription | Usage | Freemium | One-Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer prefers predictability | ✓✓✓ | ✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ |
| Value varies by usage | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ |
| Need volume for network effects | ✓ | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓ |
| High CAC, need long payback | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Easy to measure usage | ✓ | ✓✓✓ | ✓✓ | ✓ |
(✓✓✓ = strong fit, ✓ = weak fit)
Before approving any price reduction:
Primary Source:
Additional Resources:
~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.