brand-voice-extractor — independently scanned and version-tracked by SaferSkills.
SaferSkills independently audited brand-voice-extractor (Agent Skill) and scored it 100/100 (green). The audit ran 55 deterministic rules across Security, Supply Chain, Maintenance, Transparency, and Community; it found 0 high-severity and 0 lower-severity findings. The full rule-by-rule trace and per-finding evidence are below. Free, methodology-open.
Findings & checks · 0 flagged
Every scanned point with the score it earned and what moved between them.
First recorded scan — no prior version to compare against.
The primary manifest — the file an agent reads to learn what this artifact does.
Analyze a company's published content to extract their brand voice and writing style. Reads their top content pieces and produces actionable guidelines for matching their voice in future content, outreach, or campaigns.
Extract brand voice for [company]. Use their blog at [url].Or with content already cataloged:
Extract brand voice for [client]. Use the content inventory at clients/[client]/research/content-inventory.json.| Input | Required | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Content URLs | Yes | User provides, or pulled from site-content-catalog output |
| Company name | Yes | For context in the analysis |
| Number of pages | No | Default: 15. How many pages to analyze. |
If content URLs are provided directly, use those. Otherwise:
site-content-catalog outputSelection heuristic:
For each selected URL:
Analyze across these dimensions:
#### A) Tone
#### B) Vocabulary & Language
#### C) Sentence Structure
#### D) Formatting Patterns
#### E) Content Structure
#### F) Persona & Audience
Produce a Markdown document with this structure:
# Brand Voice Profile: [Company Name]
**Analyzed:** [Date] | **Content pieces analyzed:** [N]
**Sources:** [list of URLs analyzed]
---
## Voice Summary (2-3 sentences)
[Company] writes in a [tone] voice that [description]. Their content targets
[audience] and assumes [knowledge level]. The overall feel is [adjectives].
---
## Tone Profile
| Dimension | Position | Evidence |
|-----------|----------|----------|
| Formality | [e.g., Professional-casual] | [Example quote] |
| Emotional Register | [e.g., Measured, occasionally excited] | [Example] |
| Authority | [e.g., Expert/teacher] | [Example] |
| Humor | [e.g., Rare, dry when used] | [Example] |
| Directness | [e.g., Very direct, bold claims] | [Example] |
---
## Language & Vocabulary
### Reading Level
[Grade level estimate and what that means]
### Signature Phrases
- "[phrase 1]" — used frequently to [purpose]
- "[phrase 2]" — recurring pattern in [context]
### Jargon & Technical Depth
[How much industry jargon they use, how they handle technical concepts]
### Words They Love
[List of frequently used power words, adjectives, verbs]
### Words They Avoid
[Notable absences or patterns they steer away from]
---
## Structure & Formatting
### Typical Article Structure
[Outline of how their articles are typically organized]
### Sentence & Paragraph Style
- Average sentence length: [X words]
- Typical paragraph: [X sentences]
- Notable patterns: [fragments, rhetorical questions, etc.]
### Formatting Habits
- Headers: [style]
- Lists: [frequency and style]
- Emphasis: [bold/italic patterns]
- CTAs: [where, how often, what language]
---
## Audience & Persona
### Target Reader
[Role, seniority, industry, pain points they address]
### Knowledge Assumptions
[What they assume the reader already knows]
### Point of View
[I/we/you usage and what it signals]
---
## Writing Guidelines (Actionable)
Use these guidelines when writing content, outreach, or campaigns for [Company]:
### Do
- [Guideline 1 with example]
- [Guideline 2 with example]
- [Guideline 3 with example]
### Don't
- [Anti-pattern 1]
- [Anti-pattern 2]
- [Anti-pattern 3]
### Voice Samples
**Their style:**
> [2-3 representative quotes from their content that exemplify the voice]
**How to match it:**
> [2-3 example sentences written in their voice about a neutral topic]site-content-catalog output (for selecting which content to analyze)~30 seconds. Free. No account. Every finding cites a rule and a line of evidence.